Recently, in an interview with Bloomberg, U.S. National Security Adviser Sullivan said that the Senate Foreign Committee is expected to review the so-called "Taiwan Policy Act" in the next few days, and that it will meet with the leaders of the Congress to discuss this Matters related to the Taiwan Act.
Sullivan said that in this Taiwan-related plan, the United States will comprehensively enhance the so-called "US-Taiwan relations" in the fields of economy, security, military, etc., which will help "assist" Taiwan region to strengthen the so-called "security defense" . Sullivan revealed that although some of the contents of this plan made him feel "very worried", the United States' position of not allowing "forced changes to the status quo of the Taiwan Strait" will not change.
Regarding the so-called "Taiwan Policy Act" mentioned by Sullivan, Its content includes the introduction of Taiwan as the so-called "mainly non- NATO ally" in the United States , but many As we all know, Taiwan Province, as part of China's territory, has absolutely no Qualifications stand on the same height as those of the "allies" of the United States.
In addition, In this bill, it also plans to rename the so-called "representative office" established by the Taiwan authorities in the United States to "Taiwan Representative Office" . You should know that out of the commitment to upholding the "one-China principle", When other countries carry out economic, trade and cultural cooperation with the Taiwan authorities, they generally set up the "Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office".
In other words, if the United States renames the "Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office" this time, in a sense, it means that the United States openly challenged the "one-China principle" and violated its commitment to mainland China.
To put it bluntly, if this plan is reviewed and approved, the United States' ostensibly supports the "one China policy" will be self-defeating. This may be what Sullivan really worried about, because the United States will not be able to occupy a high ground in international public opinion by then. This not only means that the United States will lose the "legitimate reason" to use public opinion to attack mainland China, but also very likely to put itself in trouble. in the center of public opinion.
In addition, this plan mentioned that In view of the current tension in the Taiwan Strait, the United States will accelerate arms sales to Taiwan and even plan to provide 4.5 billion US dollars of "foreign military financing funds" to Taiwan.
This shows that in the future, the United States' arms sales to Taiwan may be more frequent in the military field, and this move will inevitably lead to a more serious situation in the Taiwan Strait. The United States' military "commitment" will also make "Taiwan independence" on the island. The elements are getting more excited, and there is no doubt that this will further deteriorate Sino-US relations.
And Sullivan obviously considered this. He was worried that the planned arms sales content would anger the mainland and force the mainland to withdraw Taiwan by force. After the reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the United States will no longer have a "better" opportunity to curb China. Development, while combining the previous actions of the United States in the Taiwan Strait and the results it has led to, it is possible to further accelerate the collapse of "US hegemony".
At present, the United States wants to provoke the mainland to seek benefits for itself on the Taiwan issue, but it is not prepared to "if the mainland recruits Taiwan, will the United States send troops to intervene?" Therefore, after several obstructions, the mainland is not allowed to recruit Taiwan. , Sullivan even clamored that "the mainland's force is a significant threat."
According to the Russian News Agency, US Deputy Secretary of Defense Carl also mentioned the so-called "China threat theory" again in an interview. The purpose is to obstruct the mainland's process of reincarnation of Taiwan through this public opinion pressure. In the interview, Carl believes that looking at China's current development from a long-term perspective, he believes that China poses a greater "threat" to the United States and the world order in the future.
Carl said that in the short term, Russia is a very "dangerous" role, but in the future, China is the only country that has the ability to challenge the United States in any way.
Carl's words are equivalent to a direct showdown. The purpose is to establish an "important enemy" for the United States to develop its military capabilities. Then, if the mainland has to adopt "non-peaceful means" to achieve unity in the future, the United States will again be in this atmosphere. To exaggerate the so-called "threat" of China to world security, thus imposing suppression and even sanctions on mainland China.
To put it bluntly, the United States actually wants to limit the mainland's way of accepting Taiwan through pressure, but you should know that the Taiwan issue belongs to China's internal affairs. Previously, the People's Liberation Army's military exercises in the Taiwan Strait were for the purpose of deterring US-Taiwan collusion and maintaining stability in the Taiwan Strait. As the initiator of undermining the peace situation in the region, the United States is completely ineligible to point fingers at the mainland on the Taiwan issue.
In terms of actual situation, the reason why the situation in the Taiwan Strait is now heating up is precisely the result of the frequent arms sales to Taiwan, collusion with the Taiwan authorities, and the release of wrong signals to the "Taiwan independence" elements on the island.
Under such a tense situation, if the window of "peaceful reunification" is unilaterally blocked due to the collusion between the United States and Taiwan, then for the sake of the maintenance of national sovereignty and territorial integrity, the mainland will not rule out the use of "non-peaceful means" to achieve it due to the maintenance of national sovereignty and territorial integrity. National unity.
In short, the United States' "public opinion war" and "sausage-cutting" strategies are not effective. On issues involving the core interests of the country, the People's Liberation Army will use its overwhelming military strength to crush all the plans of separatist forces.
