Please indicate when reprinting: Original work of Toutiao "Baijia Forum Information"
Professor Chu Yin
Professor Chu Yin is a big Internet V, maybe everyone I have heard of his name. He is a young professor, and a professor is a professor. He must have a unique perspective. He often posts many different opinions on the Internet, which attracts many people to watch. Recently, something he posted on Toutiao about the Russia-Ukraine war aroused heated discussion among many people.
1. Chu Yin’s articles disgusted netizens
Chu Yin micro headlines
After the Russo-Ukrainian war, Professor Chu Yin, as a scholar of international issues, often expressed his views on the Russo-Ukrainian war. Two days ago, an micro headline he wrote caused a lot of controversy. You can take a look at what he said:
War is not a faucet, it can be turned on and off whenever it wants. Russia and Ukraine have become a deadlock in Crimea. Whoever gives in will step down. How to solve it?
Perhaps, there will be a land swap in the future. Russia will integrate with Belarus and , and then use part of Belarus’ land to replace Crimea. In this way, Ukraine can accept it and Russia can get rid of it. If the remaining part of Belarus is annexed by Russia, Russia can still make another profit.
This possibility is becoming possible, that is, the way out for the future is the separation of Poland, Ukraine and Russia, and the legalization of Crimea and Russia. Belarus may have wanted to share the spoils at the beginning of the war, but at the end of the war, it found itself as the spoils of war.
Chu Yin's meaning is very obvious, that is, he believes that Putin will definitely not win in the end. At the last moment, under the pressure of the West, he can only compromise. On the Crimea issue, how to break the situation and satisfy all parties, that is, he predicts that Putin will directly take the land of Belarus to Ukraine to replace Crimea.
Grave Robbers Notes
This idea is indeed a mind-blowing idea, just like "Tomb Robbers Notes" by Southern School Sanshu . There are some things that make it impossible for us to even think about that place, that is, it gave us a big melon. Putin annexed Belarus, and then gave other people's Belarusian land to Ukraine. Isn't this a bit of a montage?
Let’s not talk about whether Ukraine is willing or not. The key is that the location of Crimea is too important. If you use Belarus’ land to replace it, as some netizens said, isn’t this a thatched house instead of a sea view house?
In addition, it is a bit unlikely for Russia to annex Belarus. Think about it, Russia's attack on Ukraine is not to annex it, but to achieve some of its own goals, so it launched a special military operation that was not a war. Then your annexation of Belarus is also an invasion. If others are unwilling to do so, what should I do if they object? Then the two brothers started to quarrel again, which gave Western forces a good opportunity to intervene. Maybe Russia would be attacked from both sides, which would be a bit too stupid!
Another key point is that if the final result is like this, it also means that Putin is close to failure on the Russia-Ukraine battlefield. You can think about it, is this possible?
2. Russia’s fight was indeed passive.
It is true that we were relatively optimistic about Russia at the beginning. According to the previous tactics, if you fight Ukraine, it will definitely be a quick victory. Just like Russia’s fight against Georgia , the battle will be over in only ten days.
Unexpectedly, ten months have passed and the war is still in a stalemate. The current situation may be considered that Russia has the upper hand. In fact, everyone should not forget that Russia is fighting the entire NATO war, which is equivalent to the United States and Europe. These countries have continuously provided Ukraine with advanced weapons to help them train their troops and spy on intelligence. The star chain in the sky is also provided to Ukraine for free. More importantly, it is the continuous support of US dollars and euros.
We have seen from the beginning that Russia's war is a bit timid and makes people feel very uncomfortable. In fact, what plan did Putin make? That is to de-Nazify Ukraine. The military cannot harm civilians or attack civilian facilities.
Surowikin
It was only later that when Ukraine saw how powerful Ukraine's counterattack was, and the Ukrainian side bombed the Crimea Bridge, Putin got fed up, and directly changed his generals on the spot, replacing him with General Surowikin, and then he began to bomb civilian targets in Ukrainian cities.
In fact, Russia has already controlled Ukraine's air superiority from the beginning. It stands to reason that this war should be easy to fight, just bomb it indiscriminately, just like the United States bombing Yugoslavia . After bombing for several days, it will soon surrender. However, Putin did not do that. It seems that Putin still has some concerns, that is, he is afraid of hurting innocent people and leaving a bad reputation. In fact, even now, there are voices criticizing Putin in Russia, that is, he was too weak at the beginning. If Ukraine had been blown to pieces, the war would have been over long ago!
Chu Yin posted another message
3. Netizens’ thoughts were simple
A few days later, Chu Yin posted another message about Russia’s collapse:
Many people were worried that after Russia’s defeat and collapse, China would be under greater pressure.
First of all, the question of fact has nothing to do with hope. Russia's loss of the war is a high probability event that we must consider...
This time it was said directly. Netizens should not stay in fantasy. They must face reality. That is, Russia's loss of the war is a high probability event. China needs to consider what will happen after Russia's defeat.
You can think about it. Chu Yin talked about Russia's defeat again and again. Many people must be disgusted, because we Chinese netizens do regard Russia as a brother and the United States and NATO as enemies. Don't read other things. You can read Russia From the comments below the Weibo of the Embassy in China, you will understand how sympathetic Chinese netizens are to Russia. At the beginning of the war, many people left messages to the Russian Embassy in China, saying that they would donate to them, and many of them cheered and encouraged Russia.
Because Chinese netizens feel the same for Russia, many people understand that Russia is taking a bullet for us first. If Russia fails, the United States will definitely deal with China. Therefore, the interests of Russia and China are tied together. Therefore, Chinese netizens hope that Russia will never fail and cannot fail.
We Chinese netizens are quite simple, that is, we hope that Russia can withstand the United States and NATO. Failure is not only unacceptable to Russia, but also to our Chinese netizens. You can think about it, if someone predicts that Russia will lose at this time, then the netizens will definitely feel uncomfortable, which is also reasonable.
However, some netizens are still very irrational. Sometimes it is okay to argue online, but personal attacks and abuse are not allowed.
4. Chu Yin replied
Chu Yin replied
Faced with many people’s disgust with his prediction, Chu Yin must have seen many netizens’ messages, and he actually replied. Take a look:
I half-jokingly said that the Russia-Ukraine conflict might end with the land replacement of Belarus.
A group of people got excited and sprayed all kinds of things.
I took a look, these people are basically
flash Kiev
Mariupol big fish
Kherson Big Chess
Europeans cannot survive the winter
Various supporters of Russia will never annex Ukrainian lands...
These people's various predictions about the Russo-Ukrainian war were not even correct by a dime. Some people pick up some Russian communication materials, and at least have some language foundation. Some people just digest the rubbish and come up with a new piece of rubbish.
Where does the confidence come from when trying to save face...
The Internet has memory. Look at the predictions you have made since the outbreak of the war. Are you ashamed...
What people mean is very obvious, that is, I am only half-joking. Why are you people so serious? It's even more of a joke to you to say that my predictions are inaccurate. Many people have made a lot of jokes. Are any of their predictions accurate? That's all new garbage made out of garbage. Now you're still trolling me. You'd better look in the mirror and look at your past self-proclaimed predictions. Who is right?
Chu Yin
5. Where is Chu Yin’s professor
Finally, let me introduce Professor Chu Yin. Many people may not know where he is professor. We call him professor all day long.
Chu Yin is a native of Changchun, Jilin Province. He was born in 1977, which means that he is only 45 years old this year. (The same age as French President Macron) He holds a PhD from the Renmin University of China. It seems that he stayed at the school to teach after graduation, serving as a professor in the Department of Public Administration of the School of International Relations. Exchange researcher at the Free University of Brussels, Belgium, and visiting scholar at the Center for Interregional Integration of European Universities in Belgium. Economist, scholar of international issues, researcher at China and Globalization Think Tank, deputy director of the Belt and Road Research Institute, and member of the expert committee of the Belt and Road Forum of 100.
Looking at Professor Chu Yin's resume, he should have been very good since he was a child. He has an undergraduate degree from Sichuan University , a graduate degree from Jilin University , and a doctorate from Renmin University of China. It seems that he belongs to the "Thirty-Nine Talents" (undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral students are all from 985 prestigious universities). He then stayed at the school to teach, and during this period he served as a visiting scholar at famous foreign universities.
He is quite patriotic. On April 2, 2020, the international journal "Foreign Scholars" published an "Open Letter to all walks of life in the United States" jointly signed by 100 Chinese scholars, including Chu Yin. In the open letter, these Chinese scholars opposed the United States' politicization and stigmatization of the new crown epidemic, which caused a great sensation at the time.
It is said that he announced his resignation from Renmin University of China in December last year, and now it seems that he is serving full-time as the deputy dean of digital economy think tank .
In fact, I discovered that this person is not only smart, but also very diligent. Even during his busy work, even when he had COVID-19, he wrote several articles a day, which is really amazing. Besides, some things also require multiple voices. Chinese society is diverse. For an international issue, like the COVID-19 epidemic, it is possible that experts often make mistakes. The development of things is difficult to predict, because we are all humans, not gods!
Russia cannot lose this war
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-