In the first half of this year, the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict can be said to have attracted the attention of the whole world. Of course, this conflict not only involves Russia and Ukraine, but also the United States and European countries.

In the first half of this year, the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict can be said to have attracted the attention of the whole world. Of course, this conflict not only involves Russia and Ukraine, but also the United States and European countries. In order to contain Russia, Western countries led by the United States have implemented many sanctions against Russia.

Now, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues, and the restrictive measures of European and American countries on Russia have not stopped. According to relevant information, G7 wants to curb the continuous rise in Russian oil prices by setting an oil price ceiling, and requires China and India to also follow the policies of the EU countries. So what is the specific situation of the facts?

From the perspective of the interests of the United States, the former Soviet Union was the only superpower that could compete with the United States at that time. Although the former Soviet Union collapsed, Russia inherited most of the Soviet Union's territory and military strength. In the eyes of the United States, such a situation is undoubtedly a hidden danger that threatens its hegemony. During this Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States hopes to take advantage of this international dispute to slowly consume Russia's national strength and eventually enjoy the benefits of it.

However, Russia's vitality is far more tenacious than the United States imagined. The Russian-Ukrainian war has been fighting for half a year, and Russia has not damaged its vitality as the United States expected. Instead, relying on oil, , natural gas, and other energy advantages to continuously improve national strength. It has to be said that energy exports, as Russia's pillar industry, have very significant stability. Even in a state of war, Russia can still maintain the normal operation of its domestic economy by relying on the export of energy such as oil and natural gas. To a certain extent, energy exports can be regarded as the lifeblood of Russia's economic source.

For several major EU countries, after they realized the importance of energy exports to Russia, they wanted to continue to restrict Russia from an energy perspective. Therefore, in order to hinder Russia from gaining benefits from energy exports, G7, led by the United States, hopes to set a price limit for oil exports.

At the same time, EU Energy Commissioner Simson stood up and said that it is understandable that China and India can buy Russian oil, but paying excess oil export fees to Russia is not fair. It is hoped that China and India can follow the upper limit of the Russian oil price they set and purchase Russian oil at a "fair" price.

is obvious. Such remarks can be said to be a wolfish ambition. So how should our country respond to the pressure put by many developed countries?

In fact, in the face of the "righteous words" of commissioners such as the EU, our country also gave a very clear answer, saying that the biggest influencing factor in the rise in Russian oil prices is the Russian-Ukraine war. Only by starting from this source and making the war stable can the rise of oil prices be naturally reduced.

The price of international energy fluctuates from time to time, but this does not mean that political means can be used to make mandatory regulations. Moreover, Russian oil exports also have their own choices. As long as the price is reasonable, there is no shortage of buyers for the oil exported by Russia.

If the G7 really wants to hinder Russia's income source by restricting the price of Russian oil exports, then it is not only necessary to crack down on Russia, but also to countries willing to buy Russian oil. Obviously, such actions are unlikely to occur, so these actions of the G7 seem to be overestimating.

It is worth mentioning that when G7 sets the upper limit on Russian oil exports, Russia said it will not continue to provide natural gas to Europe. You should know that many European countries are highly dependent on Russian natural gas, especially as winter is approaching, European countries are more dependent on Russian natural gas. If Russia really cuts off the supply of natural gas to European , then the only people in Europe will suffer in the end.

For our country, we will naturally not follow Western countries to impose sanctions on Russia. It can also be seen from the facts that my country and Russia have always been relatively friendly, and there are many trade exchanges, including related trade cooperation between oil and natural gas. Even under the premise of Russian oil price reduction, my country did not take advantage of others and still imported oil in accordance with the crude oil cooperation agreement.

From the above analysis, it can be seen that Western countries led by the United States can be said to be doing everything they can in limiting Russia's development. Whether from an objective or a subjective perspective, Western countries frequently suppress Russia, and this behavior itself may be difficult to be popular.

This time, some European powers have imposed the highest price limit on Russia's export of oil, which is just asking for trouble for them. After all, if Russia imposes reverse sanctions on European countries from an energy perspective, then the only countries that lack natural gas supply will suffer.

Today's topic: The price limit for Russian oil is not enough, so China is not allowed to purchase Russian oil? EU Commissioner: Because of "unfairness"