Text/Walking Stuka A few days ago, the 22nd meeting of the Council of Heads of State of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was held in Samarkand, Uzbekistan; after the summit, the leaders of the member states signed and published the "Propaganda of Samarkand".

Text/Walking Stuka

A few days ago, the 22nd meeting of the Council of Heads of State of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was held at Uzbekistan ; after the summit, the leaders of the member states signed and published the "Propaganda of Samarkand".

It is worth noting that during the summit, countries also signed a memorandum on the obligation of Iran to join SCO , which means that Iran will become the ninth member state of the SCO; in addition, countries also emphasized the importance of receiving Belarus as a member state, and approved the resolution to grant Bahrain , Maldives , Kuwait , UAE and Myanmar , and the memorandum to grant Egypt , Saudi , Qatar status. It can be said that this summit represents the influence and attractiveness of the SCO and has reached an unprecedented new historical height.

Of course, not everyone is happy to see such a situation, especially in some Western countries. After the SCO National Leaders' Summit and the China-Russian Leaders' Meeting, many Western media began to scream again, fabricating various "evidence" to criticize the prospects of China-Russia cooperation and clamoring for the so-called "China-Russia Alliance".

Of course, the one who takes the lead and bark the most fiercely must be the United States. At this Samarkand summit, the trend of China, Russia and Iran has been further strengthened. The "most dangerous situation" predicted by Brzezinsky during his lifetime is coming, and Washington is trying every means to break up the Sino-Russia-Iran cooperation relationship.

Before this, the United States said all the bad things about China, threatening us with "secondary sanctions" and tempting us with "oil price limits". However, Washington forgot that we have the glorious tradition of not eating soft and hard foods and not feeding oil and rice when we have determined our goal. We will only take the actions that are most beneficial to us.

In fact, what Washington should reflect is that the SCO is so popular is largely a "contrast of its peers." As the United States becomes less and less moral in its work, international organizations led by the United States have also become bizarre. For example, the recent International Atomic Energy Agency has done two things that go against its conscience.

The first thing is to endorse the US, Britain and Australia's technical transactions of nuclear submarine under the framework of "AUKUS"; the second thing is to arbitrarily demand that the Russian army withdraw from Zaporother nuclear power plant , completely disregarding the fact that the Ukrainian army repeatedly shelled nuclear power plants - as the United Nations agency , it is openly double standards, which violates the purposes and charter of the United Nations. Western forces led by the United States never care whether they can solve the problem. Instead, they continue to create disasters for their own interests and hegemony.

At present, the West has disrupted the international energy and food markets due to its random sanctions, bringing a serious economic crisis to the international community. What’s more serious is that in order not to let its economy collapse, the West, especially the United States, has adopted radical measures to raise interest rates in , push up the US dollar exchange rate and accelerate the plunder of the world. Many economists are worried that many countries may be at the end of their lives.

Washington never considers allies and other countries when doing things. When it can harm its neighbors, it will definitely rush up and take a bite. Under such a background, of course, more and more countries will seek another way out, and the SCO happens to be the best choice.

More and more countries are beginning to look for opportunities to cooperate with the SCO, which is to remind the United States: whether Washington is willing or not, the development trend of the world pattern cannot develop according to its will. Wherever there is oppression, there is resistance. As more and more countries begin to find a way to get rid of the influence of the United States, it is enough to prove that the United States has become a cancer of the world!