The UK may become the first target of Russia to attack! According to the Russian Gazeta website recently, British Chief of Staff Tony Radakin said in an interview that Russia not only has strong nuclear power, but also has a strong position in the space field, and can isolate London by destroying communication systems and satellite .
The chief of staff also warned that if Russia dares to do this, then NATO will inevitably respond decisively. This statement mainly conveys two meanings: First, Russia can fight nuclear war and space war, and London will become the first target of Russia's attack. Second, if Russia dares to launch an nuclear strike against or space war against London, then the latter will inevitably retaliate violently.
This is really a way to report back to report! In the case of escalating conflict between Russia and Ukraine, if Russia launches a strike against Britain, it is equivalent to declaring that World War III has begun. With Russia's current tense financial resources, military strength and sanctions by the West, it is obvious that it cannot "counter with one against many".
Looking at the characteristics of Putin 's war, they generally deal with weak opponents such as small countries, including Chechnya , Georgia and now Ukraine. Because fighting against such "vulnerable groups" will not hurt Russia's vitality and will also gain huge benefits.
In addition, in the past 20 years, there has been no precedent for war between the Five Continental People's Republic of China, and even the United States dare not confront each other head-on with China and Russia, and can only curb it through non-military means. What's more, Russia now? Therefore, the statement of British Chief of Staff Tony Radakin is untenable. Russia is unlikely to launch a space war or nuclear strike on London.
And as a nuclear-owned country, the UK also has its own nuclear strategic force. It can also destroy Russian military satellite from space through US relations. This will be a way of fighting to die together, and there will be no winners.
For Russia, the prerequisite for attacking a major country like Britain is that its territory or allies are subject to a fatal blow or space blow before they can retaliate. The same is true for NATO, led by the United States and Britain.
For example, the US " News Weekly " disclosed on the 30th that when Russia uses nuclear weapon , the US military is considering taking a series of measures to deter Russia, including dispatching submarine or B52 bomber , and carrying out a beheading operation against Putin.
NATO has also stated that if Russia uses nuclear weapons, NATO will immediately launch a large-scale retaliation strike.
Obviously, wars will break out between major powers only when they are "opposite attacks". But for the moment, Russia does not want to fight a war with any major powers. Russian Vice Foreign Minister Ryabkov once made a clear statement that it is necessary to avoid the war between the United States and Russia causing world disasters.
and the United States means the same! In addition, the Five Constables of the United Nations have reached a consensus that they will not fight nuclear war and cannot win nuclear war. Obviously, as long as the moment of life and death is not at the moment, no country is willing to fight against the enemy.
Therefore, British Chief of Staff Tony Radakin said that Russia wants to attack London, which is not true. He said this simply to warn Russia not to use nuclear weapons to deal with Ukraine, and to try to create the image of Russia as "bad guy" in public opinion, so that the whole world can stand on the side and suppress Russia together.
To put it bluntly, this is all a war of words to prevent Russia from winning! If Britain had disappeared from the map, would it still be the chief of staff?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-