On September 16, according to the British Independent, Scottish TV station and other media, British political scientists have generally felt that this "performance" deliberately arranged in Scotland cannot reverse the determination of Scots to seek independence. Even the situation would be worse...
In the final time of Queen Elizabeth , a lot of things happened around Scotland. Chief Minister Sturgeon read out the countdown to the independence vote, and the queen lived in the Scottish palace; in the heavy rain that day, the new British Prime Minister Lizhi rushed to the palace without stopping; after seeing the female prime minister, the queen suddenly fell ill and passed away in less than one day, and the court launched the Scottish plan of London Bridge
news. stv.tv
scotsman.com
independent.co.uk
The Queen's Scottish funeral was counterproductive
k
krt or not whether the Queen's "death" belongs to being arranged, it is actually difficult for all parties to prove and falsify it. But one thing is the consensus among British political commentators: the sudden death of the Queen in Scotland is a "historical opportunity" for the London court.
Before we described the "London Bridge" plan. Although it is "top secret", it was "inadvertently" leaked by intelligence departments such as Britain and the United States in 2021:
Galaxy Garden, like 33
According to the consensus of the heads of the four major administrative regions in the UK, once the "London Bridge Plan" encounters the Queen's death in Scotland, it will launch "Operation Scotland". The queen's coffin will be wrapped in Scottish tradition, and even travel through multiple representative buildings of Scottish culture...
If the situation develops as planned by the London court, a large number of Scottish people will be involved in this funeral and witness that the queen is buried in accordance with Scottish culture and etiquette, and deepens her sense of trust in the British "United Nations". However, judging from the current situation, the social effect after the funeral is not as imagined by the London court... Below is an interview with Sir John Kevin Curtis, a professor of political science at the University of Strathclyde, a famous British political scientist and a famous debater of the monarchy:
"One of the most trusted polling institutions in the UK took out a questionnaire this week, and the survey results are: The death of the queen and its subsequent commemorations are unlikely to change the tendency of Scottish people to be independent.
"Queen Elizabeth II died last week in Balmoral, Scotland, triggering a commemorative event known as Operation Unicorn. The Queen's coffin was taken to Edinburgh on Saturday and then buried at St. Giles Cathedral .
"Thousands of people watched the hearse on site, which was slowly moving between the Royal Scottish residence Holyrudhaus Palace and the Cathedral.
And the events that have occurred in the past week are unlikely to have an impact on Scotland's process of separation from the British Union... Although, this is a "major event", regardless of whether this has any impact on the future of the Scottish monarchy, or the future of public opinion support for Scotland, it seems that it has nothing to do with independence and may not (any impact)".
" Among the reasons why some people want Scotland to be separated from other parts of the UK, the monarchy does not seem to be the main factor that promotes its independence .
"There was undoubtedly a slight connection between the attitude towards independence and the attitude towards the monarchy,"
" Most of the people who voted in favor at that time hoped that Scotland was a republic, which was clearly demonstrated from the trajectory of all voters. "
" Scottish National Party (the local ruling party is also the party that promotes the process of independence) is to maintain a monarch like the Queen as the head of state.
"However, people understand the direction of causality...it's important.
"Maybe you think people decide whether they support or oppose Scottish independence based on their perception of the monarchy, or is their attitude towards the monarchy basically just a choice, a way of view of post-Scottish politics?
"My opinion is that for most people, the latter is more reasonable than the former. "
"'s perception of the monarchy is unlikely to be as important as other issues (such as the overall economy or financial impact from the UK).
"If, you end up thinking that Brexit will be an economic disaster, and Scotland's independence from British abyss will be a good choice economically, you no longer feel like British, you really want to join EU , you will not say things like 'I will still vote for the British Union because I think Scotland should maintain a monarchy...'...
Ironically, " Those who support Brexit, think Scottish independence is economically harmful and think they are British, will not vote for the division of Britain, but precisely because they want to get rid of the monarchy .
The actions of the new king caused more disgust
In fact, the "tragic card" played by the London court had little effect. Originally, the Scots were centrifugal, but the court "accidentally leaked" many scenes of the new king that are disgusting:
For example, on the first day of his work, in sharp contrast with his mother Elizabeth, he would rather curse and ask the staff to help him move the pen holder on the table, and he was always dissatisfied, but he did nothing when he was domineering (in fact, no one knew where he wanted the pen holder to be placed, and the final plan was just to move 2 inches to the right)
galaxy garden, like 81
Another example, when he signed the document the next day, he wrote the wrong date, got furious and left, and blamed the staff because of the ink. In the end, it was Camilla who came to help him "defend". The new owner in the palace has such a great temper, but his ability is so stretched... Compared to his mother, he is almost completely unable to win the favor of the monarchy advocates in the Scottish region.
galaxy garden, like 8
If you put your vision on all continents around the world, the series of "bad reputations" before the New King of Britain will not only lead to the division of Britain , but also to disintegrate the Commonwealth.
Unlike her mother Elizabeth, Charles cannot remain neutral in British politics. Since 2004, he has quietly written "Black Spider" notes to government ministers, which has been criticized by people from all walks of life. The British media even said that he would be a "noss" monarch.
In the "note" written by Charles to British officials, he himself lobbyed on some issues, including expanding English and British history courses, providing more equipment and money for British troops in Iraq, and caring for the dilemma of "toothfish" in Patagonia ...
Keeping distance from his mother from the controversial topics, when Charles was the prince, it was difficult for him to avoid the opportunity to develop his personal opinions. Just in June this year, Charles represented the Queen at the Commonwealth Summit held in the capital of Rwanda Kitali .
Two weeks before his visit, London's " Times " interviewed him, and he actually publicly claimed that the British government's plan to package all refugees to Rwanda was " horrifying ". It's like a slap in the face of the owner of Downing Street .
His remarks aroused the anger of British politicians because, according to the country's contemporary constitution, the monarch as the head of state is polite, and the monarch and crown prince must remain neutral in state affairs (especially controversial matters).
The former Commonwealth is also in danger
In addition, Charles personally participated in the lawsuit, which also marked the first time that the Commonwealth publicly recognized the legacy of slavery , or, as he said, " The wealth root of our contemporary architecture ".(The 56 members of the Commonwealth are composed of former British colonies, but others such as Rwanda were later opted to join)
Charles told the media: " When I continued to deepen my understanding of the lasting impact of slavery , I couldn't describe how deep my personal grief was about the suffering of so many people. "
" If we were to build a common future that benefits all citizens of the Commonwealth, we must also find new ways to acknowledge our past. It's simple, this is a conversation that has come, " Charles later added.
This is not the first time Charles commented on the history of Britain as a sin empire.
In 2018, he said in a visit to Ghana that the country's role in the transatlantic slave trade was "protecting atrocities"
Ghana was the first sub-Saharan African country to gain independence from colonial rule, and his statement in Ghana was full of symbolism.
At the fifth Pan-Africa Congress held in the UK in 1945, Kenya leader Jomo Kenyatta and Ghana's future first president Kwame Nkrumah jointly announced the era of decolonization, proclaiming that " If the Western world is still determined to rule mankind by force, then as a last resort, Africans may have to resort to force to achieve freedom... Our freedom of determination. " Ghana is actually one of the endorses of the British Empire rule in Africa.
Of course, in British history, Ghana's most popular points include the Queen's state visit after independence in 1961, her iconic dance with Nkrumah, but ironically, at that time, the door of her own palace was still posted with posters " Black people and dogs, and Irish people not allowed to enter ".
22 Today, the British monarch is no longer the head of 14 African countries, because the African independence movement was violently suppressed by the British government during Elizabeth's rule.
A few months after Elizabeth ascended the throne, he sent a large number of British troops to wipe out the colonies. At least 311,000 "Maomao members" who fought for independence were killed, including more than 1,000 people who were hanged in public by the British army between 1952 and 1960.
Kenya Human Rights Commission estimated that the raid launched by Queen Elizabeth caused 90,000 Kenyans to be executed, tortured or disabled, and 160,000 people to be detained.
In 2013, 5,000 Kenyan torture victims filed a lawsuit with the British government, and the British government paid a total of 19.9 million pounds (US$31 million) after losing the case. The one involved in the lawsuit was Charles...
Although African countries are unlikely to completely separate from the Commonwealth, as political analyst Nicholas Sengoba wrote, the group is the legacy of international monetary system , aiming to make African countries continue to rely on the United Kingdom. Media writers from all over Africa are disgusted with the so-called historical purification context of peaceful handover promoted by the British government. The new king is not good at maintaining the relationship between members.
As Neslin Malik wrote in " Guardian ", " Sunshine did not fall on the empire: people were occupied and expelled, usually involved in bloody wars... The queen has left, and the country we imagined will leave with it. "
Some critical comments touched the nerves of the British top leaders. Twitter deleted a post by Nicholas Uju Anya, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, in which she congratulated the queen on her departure in the process of rule over the " stealing, rape, and genocide empire ".
tweet was complained by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos . The BBC also posted a statement on its social media platform asking viewers to "respect" the queen, after BBC celebrated the queen's long-term "beautiful" relationship with Africa on Twitter.
Now, a more controversial king has come to power, and he is even worse than his mother in diplomacy. How long can the so-called Commonwealth last?
Since the day he became the prince, Charles has been waiting for the stars and the moon for decades.
In fact, there is no such "old" prince in British history.
However, when he really waited for the day when he ruled the world, the empire left to him by his mother was already shaking...
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The master of conspiracy, the good articles continue, and the wonderful continues!
Author: Beauty Zheng Hao
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-