According to Reuters, on May 31, local time, U.S. Commerce Secretary Raimondo announced that the Biden administration was considering adding more Chinese companies to the sanctions list. Since the Trump administration, the United States has adopted the "entity list" approach to i

Blinken As soon as Blinken’s China policy speech ended, there was a commotion in Washington. According to Reuters report, on May 31, local time, US Secretary of Commerce Raimondo announced that the Biden administration is considering adding more Chinese companies to the sanctions list.

Since the Trump administration, the United States has used the "entity list" to impose economic sanctions on China on the grounds of "national security", and the Biden administration has also continued this policy. Raimondo said that the United States will not relax sanctions on China and will launch a comprehensive investigation into Chinese companies in the near future to determine whether they have "bad behavior" in circumventing U.S. sanctions.

Raimondo added that as far as she knows, American companies, led by Apple, are considering moving some production lines out of China. If conditions permit, the United States will cooperate with its allies to implement trade restrictions on China.

China will resolutely fight back against the US's outrageous and unreasonable actions. Since 2020, our Ministry of Commerce has established an "Unreliable Entity List" and has included major U.S. arms giants in it to implement reciprocal countermeasures.

China’s Ministry of Commerce once responded that the United States’ sanctions against Chinese companies are entirely based on trade protectionism and run counter to the current trend of globalization. In order to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests, China has implemented reciprocal countermeasures with the purpose of regulating the normal order of the markets of the two countries. There are essential differences between the two.

html On May 26, Blinken delivered a speech on China policy, claiming that in the next ten years, the United States will deal with China through "investment, alliances, and competition." He clearly pointed out that China has the intention to reshape the world order and has corresponding capabilities in economy, diplomacy, military and science and technology. This will bring unprecedented challenges to the foreign policy of the United States, but the United States will try its best to avoid conflicts or conflicts. The emergence of the "new cold war".

Dean of the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University Wu Xinbo pointed out that Blinken’s speech was lackluster and there was no obvious change in the tone of China policy, which is mainly reflected in the following three points: first, he regards China as his main competitor; second, Through inward investment and external alliances, it has changed the strategic environment around China and suppressed China; thirdly, the tone of its relations with China is quite bad, and it has made unbridled accusations and smeared China on Taiwan-related and human rights issues.

Another point of view points out that although Blinken's speech seems "moderate", it actually contains evil intentions. The United States knows very well that if it wants to attract Asia-Pacific countries to join the "anti-China camp," it must be more cautious in its wording. No country will risk offending China and rashly align itself with the United States. To this end, the United States must portray China as a "negative example" of the international community and slander China.

Spokespersons of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs have successively refuted the nonsense made by the US, pointing out that the essence of the US policy towards China is to spread false news, exaggerate the "China threat theory" for no reason, grossly interfere in China's internal affairs, and discredit China's foreign policy. At the same time, the Eastern Theater Command of the People's Liberation Army organized large-scale drills in the sea and airspace surrounding the Taiwan Strait. The Ministry of National Defense issued a stern warning that the Chinese People's Liberation Army is ready to take all necessary measures to resolutely thwart external interference and "Taiwan independence" separatist plots.

Recently, Foreign Minister Wang Yi attended the "Kissinger and Sino-US Relations" seminar and delivered a speech. He is sincerely puzzled by the current Sino-US relations, calling the atmosphere "very abnormal" and believing that the US's extreme anxiety is completely unnecessary. The two countries should properly manage their differences, break away from the logic of competition, and enhance exchanges and cooperation.

To sum up, although the United States repeatedly emphasizes that it does not seek conflict and strives to avoid a "new Cold War", the essence of its China policy has not changed at all. In other words, the Biden administration unilaterally believes that "competition" has always been the main tone of the relationship between the two countries. Its thinking, strategy and policies towards China may be difficult to reverse in the short term. The United States may continue to do so for a long time to come. This is a political situation of "capriciousness" and "betrayal".