According to the Russian Satellite Network, when it was mentioned at the press conference that Western society expressed dissatisfaction with the Russian military strategy, Putin responded: "You are smart people, why do you treat us as fools?" A series of important defense agreements that the United States is determined to withdraw from, including the Guide Treaty and the Open Skies Treaty. After comparing the strategic differences between the United States and Russia, he pointed out that Russia only has military bases in areas with terrorist tendencies, while the United States has military bases and networks all over the world.
Putin pointed out these points directly at the pain points of the United States and NATO, because this is a typical "I can do it, you can't." Military conflicts between the United States and Russia have become commonplace. In sensitive areas such as the Black Sea and the Bering Strait, there are often military frictions between the two sides. In fact, each other is constantly testing the bottom line that each other can bear.
Previously, the large-scale deployment of nuclear weapons by the US military in Europe has aroused fierce opposition from Russia. Putin said even more bluntly: "If the war hits Russia's fundamental interests, nuclear weapons will be used." In the face of such a tough attitude, even Trang Pu is also quite honest.
In addition to a huge nuclear arsenal, does Russia really have the ability to counter the US military?
First of all, American domestic military experts believe that if a war breaks out between the United States and Russia in the future, the main forms will be air and land warfare. Now that Russia does not even have an aircraft carrier in service, it will certainly not engage in conventional surface wars with the US military by pebbles. Land warfare is a war with huge casualties. The US military has always adhered to the operational philosophy of "life is the most expensive", so it will not make too much effort in land warfare. Air combat will become the most critical battlefield for both sides!
Next, in terms of seizing air supremacy, the U.S. military is now in a state of far ahead. On the one hand, the excellent performance of the F-22 has not yet had a fifth-generation function to compete with it. Although Russia’s upcoming S-500 claims to have four radars and a variety of strike methods, it is still unclear whether the F-22 can be captured successfully. Solve the mystery. On the other hand, the production of the lesser F-35 has exceeded 600. According to combat requirements, it is completely feasible to strike targets from multiple directions and multiple points while destroying regions with great war resources.
Once again, although Russia’s Su-57 leads the way in the fields of situational awareness and infrared directional interference, the most critical stealth performance and output have always been the biggest critics. It is unknown how much cheapness can be obtained in actual combat. It is not a concern for the US Air Force. After seizing air supremacy, it was the time when the bombers showed their talents. Several of the world's best-performing strategic bombers, , served in the US and Russian armies.
Take B-2 and Tu-160 to illustrate. The former adopts flying wing layout, has strong stealth performance, and the strike range is enough to cover any corner of the world. However, although B-2 has several actual combat experiences in the Middle East battlefield, it still needs to be considered whether it can be placed on the US-Russian battlefield. The latter is a supersonic strategic bomber, once known as the "sweet sing" before the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and its power cannot be underestimated in conjunction with over-the-horizon strikes. After Russia has improved it, flying in the Baltic coastal countries from time to time can cause panic in NATO.
The U.S. military's pressing on Russia over the years has almost stirred Putin's sensitive nerves, and even created an atmosphere that "Once the war starts, Russia will undoubtedly lose." Under this pressure, various high-tech weapons have emerged in Russia in recent years, such as the supersonic anti-ship missile "Zircon", the nuclear-powered torpedo "Poseidon", etc., and only this Only weapons can maintain a relatively delicate balance with the United States.
