Recently, Musk , which just took over Twitter, took action again. After sorting out internal information and data, he found a lot of black information about the Biden team related to the 2020 election.
In the past few days, Musk has successively commissioned Substack reporter Matt Taibbi to post some Twitter at the request of Biden's team to delete relevant news and comments about Biden's son Hunter Biden's notebook investigation incident.
Now, Musk's revelation operation has gone to round 2, which is the second round.
In the first batch of exposures last Friday, there were screenshots of Twitter employee emails, mentioning how they banned, blocked, and censored accounts and comments discussing Hunter's notebook.
If the above can only represent the "spontaneous" behavior of Twitter employees, then there is still a lot of evidence that this ban is directly inspired by the Biden campaign.
Musk also confirmed that there is indeed intervention from Biden's team.
. This matter did not go through the Twitter CEO OJack Dorsey . He had no idea about it, but directly passed through the Indian female senior executive who was fired by Musk before. The so-called head of the law, policy and credit department, Vijaya Gadde, is this person:
. To put it bluntly, he is a content reviewer, but he has received a lot of money and is a typical representative of cheating food and drink in a big company in Twitter.
and there are many employees inside Twitter who are puzzled by this behavior, but because liberals account for the majority, they finally implemented it smoothly. Twitter, as a platform that advocates protecting speech, has gradually established many censorship mechanisms starting little by little, and these mechanisms are all controlled by the self-proclaimed liberal. And their self-righteous mechanism is actually to serve their own prejudice and madness. The news about Hunter's notebook was blocked, and Zuckerberg, president of meta, admitted that
At that time, the two largest Internet platforms had to die and Twitter, both blocked unfavorable news for Biden. A poll showed that if the Hunter incident was known before the vote, many independent voters would make different choices.
So, the purpose of large technology companies manipulating US election was very easy to complete.
This article will also talk about those self-righteous lieutenants who all scoff at these news as "conspiracy theories" to show their "objective and neutrality". Most importantly, this can strengthen their "elite" identification with themselves. Because of this, they blindly describe Trump fans as without knowledge, the bottom class, and the education level is low, so that their "elite" recognition can be highlighted.
This is also a very effective brainwashing technique from the European and American leftists. That is, if you are not on our side and do not support our views, you are backward, conservative, extreme, stupid, and full of hatred. This set of brainwashing techniques is particularly effective for young people. This group especially needs the outside world to recognize their fashion, trend, progressive, intelligent and inclusive qualities. Naturally, they tend to be leftist.
. In the Hunter notebook incident, their words are very simple. They do not report the mainstream. The news that big platforms banned must be fake news, conspiracy theories, who believe it, or who thinks this matter is worth investigating, and who is the bottom red neck without a brain. After such a combination of punches was put off, many people retreated. After all, no one wants to make themselves look like a "big fool" who believes in "conspiracy theories".
However, the fact is that not only the Hunter notebook incident is not a conspiracy theory, but the big platform helps Biden ban Hunter notebook incident is not a conspiracy theory, and Biden's team's request for big platforms to intervene in banning is not a conspiracy theory, and most importantly, large technology companies are controlled by Zuokuan and have enough ability to influence the political situation in the United States. The real "talk" behind it is not a conspiracy theory. On the contrary, they may be closer to the real facts.
What's more, conspiracy theories, or questioning authoritative narratives, are the right that the people in the European and American system should have. As long as there is any opaque and undisclosed place, the " conspiracy theory " should be allowed to appear. What should be accused is never the so-called "conspiracy theories", but those behaviors that are shameful in the dark.
