Tsai Ing-wen
According to Global Network , citing reports from the island media, on November 30, Tsai Ing-wen's lawyer Lian Yuanlong showed Tsai Ing-wen's "doctoral thesis" in the Taipei District Court. The two sides were verbally fighting on the spot, and the scene was very fierce.
On November 30, when Lian Yuanlong displayed the so-called "doctoral thesis" of Tsai Ing-wen, the first judge Zhang Yonghui, who was the judge who was the trial of the case, personally inspected and recorded it in court. But it is worth noting that Lian Yuanlong's so-called "doctoral dissertation" of Tsai Ing-wen appeared in 2019. At that time, facing the media's doubts about Tsai Ing-wen's "doctoral dissertation", a spokesperson for Tsai Ing-wen's office once publicly displayed the paper in front of reporters. But it is worth noting that regarding this result, as early as the day before, on November 29, Peng Wenzheng's lawyer Zhang Jing announced that what Tsai Ing-wen wants to display is not his original "doctoral thesis", but was publicly displayed to the public in 2019.
is indeed not surprising. On November 30, after Judge Zhang Yonghui of Taipei District Court inspected and completed the "paper record", Zhang Jing said that a doctoral thesis submitted to the school must be bound into a book, but what he saw was only a draft, not a version that passed the review after the doctoral oral examination, which was of little significance, and the doctoral thesis should have copyright page , binding and number. Zhang Jing’s meaning is very simple. This paper that appeared in court is not the most original Tsai Ing-wen’s “doctoral thesis”.
In response to this, Tsai Ing-wen's lawyer Lian Yuanlong quickly explained that Tsai Ing-wen submitted the original manuscript of the paper in accordance with the school regulations, and at that time there was only typewriter , so he could only modify the wrong part with Li Kebai. He also proposed that the Taipei City Court could also get a reply from the school through other channels to prove that the manuscript was Tsai Ing-wen's doctoral thesis.
Tsai Ing-wen's "doctoral thesis"
I have to say that Lian Yuanlong kicked the "ball" to the Taipei District Court again. His meaning was very simple. This thesis is true, and there is only one. If you don't believe it, you can ask Tsai Ing-wen's London School of Economics . This is interesting. With the London School of Political Science and Economics’ practices in Tsai Ing-wen’s “doctoral thesis” in the past, can we get an accurate and true answer from there? This is very questionable.
In addition, the two sides also had a fierce debate over the traces of the correction on this "doctoral thesis". Tsai Ing-wen's paper was coated with a "Likebai" modification liquid. Zhang Jing questioned, was there a "Likebai" modification liquid in 1983? Then the two sides had a fierce debate on when the "Likebai" tuning liquid will be circulated on the market. Later, Zhang Jing also said that after investigation, it was indeed found that Li Kebai had invented in the 1950s, but he mentioned that computers were invented a long time ago. However, when Taiwanese people use personal computers, they have to wait until the 1980s. When was Li Kebai imported and sold in Taiwan, it is no longer possible to test the test, but the key point is that there is no trace of correction on real doctoral thesis.
After several hours of debate and facing a series of controversies, Judge Zhang Yonghui's statement was very interesting. Zhang Yonghui finally notified that the final verdict would be announced at 5 pm on December 23, and then turned around and left the table. Zhang Jing was so angry that she slapped the judge several times, scolding the judge as a bastard. Some people at the audience said that the judge was outrageous and the judicial system had no credibility at all, and even pointed at Tsai Ing-wen's lawyer to scold.
chased and beat Peng Wenzhen, who was Tsai Ing-wen's "doctoral thesis", which is interesting. With many doubts and controversy between both sides, why did the judge hurriedly pronounce the verdict? Is it just because Tsai Ing-wen is the leader of Taiwan? It has to be said that this move has suffered a heavy blow to the credibility of the judicial credibility on the island.
