At the Madrid NATO Summit held this year, US President Biden proposed to extend the military strength of NATO and gradually penetrate into the Asia-Pacific region. There is no doubt that the US move is to suppress the rising China and maintain its world hegemony. At present, France and Germany do not agree with this. French President Macron also made it clear, "China seems not to be on the Atlantic power map. Why do we have to go to the Asia-Pacific region thousands of miles away to fight against China." However, the United States' "iron-core ally" in NATO, Britain expressed support, and the new British Prime Minister Tras also threatened to extend NATO's military power to the Asia-Pacific region and even "protect Taiwan."
Observation found that in addition to NATO internal members, there are also countries in the Asia-Pacific region that are ready to move. NATO plans to enter the Asia-Pacific Queen, and four countries in the region are willing to be "springboards" to make the roadmap clearer and clearer. According to reference information, Nozdlev, Director of the Third Asian Division of the Russian Foreign Ministry, recently publicly stated that NATO's roadmap for march to the Asia-Pacific has been clearly presented, that is, NATO will rely on the four countries of Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand, and gradually spread its influence and military spheres to the Asia-Pacific region.
It is obvious that according to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the new four countries of Australia, Japan and South Korea are willing to serve as a "springboard" for the United States to expand NATO's sphere of influence in the Asia-Pacific region. Due to the cooperation of these four countries, NATO's roadmap for entering the Asia-Pacific has become clearer and clearer. So, why should the United States lead NATO to expand in the Asia-Pacific region? Why did Australia, Japan and South Korea become NATO's reliance on achieving this goal? There may be two reasons.
On the one hand, with China's continuous rise and becoming increasingly powerful, the United States deeply feels that relying solely on its own strength is not enough to curb China's rise. Even if the United States has this ability, the United States is unwilling to fight China alone, because this means that the superpower will pay a very heavy price. The final result can only be a battle between the snipe and the clam, and other countries will benefit, and the United States' hegemony cannot be maintained.
Therefore, according to the strategic vision of the United States, superpowers must "unite all forces that can be united" to target China, and when necessary, they will even create a "agent war" for China, while the United States hides behind the scenes. In this way, they can not only curb China's rise but also preserve their own strength.
As we all know, NATO is the world's largest military group led by the United States, with 30 member states. If the United States can expand NATO's sphere of influence and influence to the Asia-Pacific region, it means that the United States will be able to form a "group fight" against China in the Asia-Pacific region.
In this way, the United States will have considerable advantages in curbing China's rise, and at least offset the various costs the United States may pay. Therefore, although NATO is mainly composed of European countries, under the instigation of the United States, it has indeed begun to interfere in the Asia-Pacific region, and this speed is constantly accelerating.
This is actually not good news for China and Russia, especially for China, which means that in the next few years or even 10 years, we will face huge military pressure from NATO, which will seriously affect the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
On the other hand, as mentioned above, NATO is a military group mainly composed of European countries. If NATO wants to expand its influence in the Asia-Pacific region and turn the Asia-Pacific into its own "one acre and three-point land", it requires local countries to cooperate. Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand are exactly the guide for NATO to enter the Asia-Pacific, because they meet two attributes. First, these four countries are all Asia-Pacific countries; second, these four countries are all allies of the United States.
So the United States can be familiar with it, making NATO Asia-Pacific, and extending its black hands to the Asia-Pacific region.Previously, the heads of the four countries participated in this year's NATO summit, Japan and South Korea also established "offices" in NATO, and Australia and New Zealand themselves are members of the " Five Eyes Alliance " led by the United States. Cooperation can be seamlessly connected. The storm is coming and the wind is filling the building. Before China's rise, some challenges cannot be avoided. This is the most severe test for China and the last big question. Only by breaking through it can the Chinese nation have a bright future. Therefore, for China, it is only allowed to win but not lose.
