Lee Guangman Freezing Comments 1186
The biggest highlight of this year’s NATO summit is not the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but the participation of the leaders of the four Asia-Pacific countries Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand at the NATO summit. No matter what the leaders of these four countries say, or what other countries do Although it is not aimed at China, the fact is that NATO has taken substantial steps towards its eastward expansion into the Asia-Pacific.
mentioned China an unprecedented 14 times in the G7 communique issued on the 28th, saying that G7 member states believe that China and Russia are the main common threats they face. Kirby, the coordinator of the White House National Security Council, said that the purpose of the G7 meeting and the NATO summit is very clear, which is to focus on defining the common challenges of the West in the next few decades, "including the challenges posed by China" and the upcoming NATO new " "Strategic Concept" is aimed at China.
Before this G7 summit, the Secretary-General of NATO announced a major decision, that is, NATO decided to expand its military by 750%, expanding the NATO Quick Response Force from only 40,000 soldiers to 300,000 soldiers. NATO is moving from a A military organization in name only became a substantive military organization. On June 29, NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg promised at the NATO Summit in Madrid that NATO countries will use at least 2% of their GDP for national defense, and 2% will be the lower limit rather than the upper limit. It is expected that by 2024 In 2019, all allies will adhere to the 2% defense spending guideline.
On June 29, the heads of NATO member states adopted a latest strategic document in Madrid. The latest strategy document describes Russia as "the most serious and direct threat to the security of allies and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region." It says that Russia "seeks to establish spheres of influence and achieve goals through coercion, subversion, aggression, and annexation." direct control. The country’s coercive military posture, rhetoric, and willingness to use force to achieve its political goals undermine the rules-based international order using conventional, cyber, and hybrid means against NATO and its partners. The document describes China as: "We face systemic competition, including from the People's Republic of China , who challenge our interests, security and values and seek to undermine the rules-based international order."
2019 London NATO Summit The final document stated about China that “we recognize that China’s growing influence and international policies have brought opportunities and challenges that we need to respond to together as an alliance.” In 2020, NATO did not hold an offline summit due to the epidemic, and its online summit Documents published on 2021 describe China as “best understood as a systemic adversary across the spectrum.” Documents from a 2021 NATO summit in Brussels describe China as “China’s growing influence and international policies may bring challenges that we need to address together as an alliance. We will engage with China to defend the alliance's security interests."
It was clear that NATO's focus on China was not very obvious until 2022, when NATO's focus suddenly became clear. Right China. NATO believes that, first, they face systemic competition from China, second, China challenges their interests, security and values, and third, China undermines the rules-based international order. Judging from the statements of all parties, these three statements about China actually represent the intentions of the United States and may not be the consensus of other European countries.
Zhao Lijian said in this regard, "As a product of the Cold War and the world's largest military alliance, NATO has long adhered to outdated security concepts and has long become a tool for individual countries to maintain hegemony." He advised NATO "What it should do is to give up the Cold War mentality , zero-sum game , the practice of creating enemies, do not try to mess up Asia and the whole world after messing up Europe.”
In addition to unifying the thoughts of various countries in the Russia-Ukraine war, this NATO summit is obviously turning its focus to China. This is mainly reflected in two aspects. First, this summit invites the four countries in the Asia-Pacific region, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand to participate; The latest NATO strategy published lists China as a systemic competitor of NATO.
I see that many people focus on the differences between European countries and the United States on China's positioning when analyzing the just-concluded G7 summit and this NATO summit. There seems to be no focus on NATO's eastward expansion to the Asia-Pacific and the threats and harm this process will cause to China. However, I believe that when analyzing international issues, we must look at the general trends and trends. The current trend is that NATO has begun to expand eastward to the Asia-Pacific. , began to move from Europe and the United States to the world.
I have the following ten aspects of analysis:
First, NATO is a military organization. The foundation and premise for the existence of NATO is the Soviet Union. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was Russia, and now the United States is building it. A new theory of the existence of NATO, that is, the theory of NATO moving from both sides of the North Atlantic to a global international military organization, and the strategy and theory of expanding NATO's enemies from Russia to China. The United States is a country that focuses on strategy and theory. They are building a new geopolitical strategy and theory to unite all Western countries, including Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, to strangle China.
Second, the United States is creating a public opinion that China is not only targeting the Asia-Pacific and Indo-Pacific regions. , and it is a threat to Europe and even the world. This is what the NATO strategic document says that China is a systemic threat and a challenge to their interests, security and values, thus making China become the entire NATO , the enemy of the entire Western countries and even the entire world. This is actually the real reason why the United States demonizes China by fabricating lies about human rights issues in Xinjiang and fabricating that the new coronavirus comes from a Chinese laboratory. This gives NATO a moral sense to expand eastward in the Asia-Pacific.
The third reason is that NATO's eastward expansion to the Asia-Pacific is the transfer of NATO's military power from Europe to the Asia-Pacific. This is different from other alliance systems established by the United States in the Asia-Pacific. It is consistent with the United States' return to the Asia-Pacific strategy and the Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy. It is necessary to shift the military focus of the entire Western group of countries to the Asia-Pacific and China's periphery, and build a situation in which the entire Western world militarily encircles China. Inviting Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand to participate in the NATO summit is the key and core to realizing NATO's eastward expansion to the Asia-Pacific. , this is consistent with the previous U.S.-led formation of the Orcus Alliance with the participation of the United States, Australia, and Britain. The United States realizes that it is too far away from China. Today, with the rapid rise of China's military, it is no longer possible to rely on U.S. military power to threaten or even defeat China. . Therefore, the United States wants to build a nuclear submarine base in Australia to allow Australia to have nuclear power. Recently, South Korea is also hyping up the restart and increase of the THAAD missile defense system, and Japan is also hyping up about sharing nuclear weapons , etc., which are all in line with the United States' NATO expansion to the Asia-Pacific eastward. There is a significant connection.
Fifth, the development of China's military equipment is making significant progress. The recent launch of the Fujian ship, the success of the sixth land-based mid-course anti-missile test, etc. tell us that we must continue to the Taiwan Strait and the so-called It is no longer possible for the first island chain to pose a military threat to China. Therefore, on the one hand, the United States wants to build Australia into a forward base for the United States to carry out nuclear deterrence and nuclear strikes against China. It will continue to deploy the THAAD missile defense system in South Korea and nuclear weapons To pretend to be Japan, on the other hand, it is to borrow the power of the entire NATO to jointly deal with China. Lee Guangman Freezing Comments 1186 The biggest highlight of this year’s NATO summit is not the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but the participation of the leaders of the four Asia-Pacific countries Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand at the NATO summit. No matter what the leaders of these four countries say, or what other countries do Although it is not aimed at China, the fact is that NATO has taken substantial steps towards its eastward expansion into the Asia-Pacific. mentioned China an unprecedented 14 times in the G7 communique issued on the 28th, saying that G7 member states believe that China and Russia are the main common threats they face. Kirby, the coordinator of the White House National Security Council, said that the purpose of the G7 meeting and the NATO summit is very clear, which is to focus on defining the common challenges of the West in the next few decades, "including the challenges posed by China" and the upcoming NATO new " "Strategic Concept" is aimed at China. Before this G7 summit, the Secretary-General of NATO announced a major decision, that is, NATO decided to expand its military by 750%, expanding the NATO Quick Response Force from only 40,000 soldiers to 300,000 soldiers. NATO is moving from a A military organization in name only became a substantive military organization. On June 29, NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg promised at the NATO Summit in Madrid that NATO countries will use at least 2% of their GDP for national defense, and 2% will be the lower limit rather than the upper limit. It is expected that by 2024 In 2019, all allies will adhere to the 2% defense spending guideline. On June 29, the heads of NATO member states adopted a latest strategic document in Madrid. The latest strategy document describes Russia as "the most serious and direct threat to the security of allies and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region." It says that Russia "seeks to establish spheres of influence and achieve goals through coercion, subversion, aggression, and annexation." direct control. The country’s coercive military posture, rhetoric, and willingness to use force to achieve its political goals undermine the rules-based international order using conventional, cyber, and hybrid means against NATO and its partners. The document describes China as: "We face systemic competition, including from the People's Republic of China , who challenge our interests, security and values and seek to undermine the rules-based international order." 2019 London NATO Summit The final document stated about China that “we recognize that China’s growing influence and international policies have brought opportunities and challenges that we need to respond to together as an alliance.” In 2020, NATO did not hold an offline summit due to the epidemic, and its online summit Documents published on 2021 describe China as “best understood as a systemic adversary across the spectrum.” Documents from a 2021 NATO summit in Brussels describe China as “China’s growing influence and international policies may bring challenges that we need to address together as an alliance. We will engage with China to defend the alliance's security interests." It was clear that NATO's focus on China was not very obvious until 2022, when NATO's focus suddenly became clear. Right China. NATO believes that, first, they face systemic competition from China, second, China challenges their interests, security and values, and third, China undermines the rules-based international order. Judging from the statements of all parties, these three statements about China actually represent the intentions of the United States and may not be the consensus of other European countries. Zhao Lijian said in this regard, "As a product of the Cold War and the world's largest military alliance, NATO has long adhered to outdated security concepts and has long become a tool for individual countries to maintain hegemony." He advised NATO "What it should do is to give up the Cold War mentality , zero-sum game , the practice of creating enemies, do not try to mess up Asia and the whole world after messing up Europe.” In addition to unifying the thoughts of various countries in the Russia-Ukraine war, this NATO summit is obviously turning its focus to China. This is mainly reflected in two aspects. First, this summit invites the four countries in the Asia-Pacific region, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand to participate; The latest NATO strategy published lists China as a systemic competitor of NATO. I see that many people focus on the differences between European countries and the United States on China's positioning when analyzing the just-concluded G7 summit and this NATO summit. There seems to be no focus on NATO's eastward expansion to the Asia-Pacific and the threats and harm this process will cause to China. However, I believe that when analyzing international issues, we must look at the general trends and trends. The current trend is that NATO has begun to expand eastward to the Asia-Pacific. , began to move from Europe and the United States to the world. I have the following ten aspects of analysis: First, NATO is a military organization. The foundation and premise for the existence of NATO is the Soviet Union. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was Russia, and now the United States is building it. A new theory of the existence of NATO, that is, the theory of NATO moving from both sides of the North Atlantic to a global international military organization, and the strategy and theory of expanding NATO's enemies from Russia to China. The United States is a country that focuses on strategy and theory. They are building a new geopolitical strategy and theory to unite all Western countries, including Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, to strangle China. Second, the United States is creating a public opinion that China is not only targeting the Asia-Pacific and Indo-Pacific regions. , and it is a threat to Europe and even the world. This is what the NATO strategic document says that China is a systemic threat and a challenge to their interests, security and values, thus making China become the entire NATO , the enemy of the entire Western countries and even the entire world. This is actually the real reason why the United States demonizes China by fabricating lies about human rights issues in Xinjiang and fabricating that the new coronavirus comes from a Chinese laboratory. This gives NATO a moral sense to expand eastward in the Asia-Pacific. The third reason is that NATO's eastward expansion to the Asia-Pacific is the transfer of NATO's military power from Europe to the Asia-Pacific. This is different from other alliance systems established by the United States in the Asia-Pacific. It is consistent with the United States' return to the Asia-Pacific strategy and the Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy. It is necessary to shift the military focus of the entire Western group of countries to the Asia-Pacific and China's periphery, and build a situation in which the entire Western world militarily encircles China.
Fifth, the development of China's military equipment is making significant progress. The recent launch of the Fujian ship, the success of the sixth land-based mid-course anti-missile test, etc. tell us that we must continue to the Taiwan Strait and the so-called It is no longer possible for the first island chain to pose a military threat to China. Therefore, on the one hand, the United States wants to build Australia into a forward base for the United States to carry out nuclear deterrence and nuclear strikes against China. It will continue to deploy the THAAD missile defense system in South Korea and nuclear weapons To pretend to be Japan, on the other hand, it is to borrow the power of the entire NATO to jointly deal with China.
Sixth, Now there is an abnormal phenomenon in the entire Western world. On the one hand, the entire Western economy is in recession, economic development is slow, and inflation is very serious. Almost all Western countries, including the United States and Japan, are printing large amounts of money. Taking on debt to survive, on the other hand, military expenditures have begun to increase significantly, or are preparing to increase significantly. Germany, the United Kingdom, South Korea, Japan, and Australia all have this trend. We can foresee a more militarized, militarized, and Nazi-oriented Western world. is reappearing.
Seventh, The current unipolar hegemony of the United States has encountered many difficulties. It has led to high inflation through unlimited money printing. The national credit of the United States, which maintains the global hegemony of the US dollar, has collapsed. The high-tech hegemony of the United States is facing a ceiling that is difficult to break through. The United States is ahead of other countries. The advantages of military equipment are also being lost. However, the United States did not realize that its national and military power had reached the farthest limit of its ability to maintain global hegemony. However, it continued to promote NATO's eastward expansion in an attempt to crush and disintegrate Russia. As a result, Russia overturned the table in Ukraine . Angry, he launched a war against Ukraine. At this time, the United States thought it could use the most severe sanctions in history to make Russia lose its war capabilities. What was the result? Everyone has seen that not only Russia is trapped in a long-term war, but also the entire NATO, including the United States, and Russia has not been defeated.
Eight is At this time, the United States does not know whether to live or die, and continues to lead the entire NATO countries to support Ukraine in an attempt to defeat Russia in Ukraine. However, the United States does not dare to fight Russia and have a head-on conflict. It can only fight a proxy war, which is exposed The nature of the American paper tiger. Not only that, the United States also wants to expand NATO eastward to the Asia-Pacific, regard China as NATO's strategic enemy, and force China and Russia to form a de facto strategic alliance. Now as long as China continues to maintain trade with Russia, the United States will not be able to fight Win the proxy war between Russia and Ukraine.
Nine is What’s even more strange is that the United States clearly knows that China and Russia joining forces is a nightmare for the United States, but step by step it pushes China and Russia to join forces to resist the United States. It knows clearly that provoking China on the Taiwan issue will only allow China to use force to liberate Taiwan, but it It still spares no effort to do this. Not only does the United States do this on its own, but it also takes the entire NATO to do this. Whether it is from a national strategy or a geostrategic perspective, doing this is not good for the United States. But the United States still does this. What does it mean? ? Now we need to look back. Why did Japan want to anger the United States after fully invading China? sneak attack on Pearl Harbor? Now the United States keeps provoking China on the Taiwan issue. In fact, it is exactly the same as when Japan launched the Pacific War. If the United States really forces China to launch a war to liberate Taiwan, and the United States dares to intervene with force, then the final outcome of the United States must be that of that year. Japan's ending.
Ten is The United States is constantly creating conflicts on the Taiwan issue, challenging China's bottom line, and inviting China. This is betting that China will not dare to use force against Taiwan, or it is betting that China will not dare to intervene in the Taiwan Strait issue after the United States and Japan threaten to intervene. It still dares to use force against Taiwan, and it is even betting that if the entire NATO opposes China's use of force against Taiwan, China still dares to use force to solve the Taiwan issue. If this is a kind of psychological warfare and a war of wills, it is understandable. If the United States really uses this to fight against China versus , we can only say that the United States does not understand China. They do not know that "the Chinese people cannot be messed with, and if they are messed with, it will be difficult to deal with." Why do you say that the Chinese people are not messed with? Why is it said that it is difficult to offend the Chinese people? I think this needs to be carefully considered by the United States and the entire West.
After the end of the War to Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea, Peng Dehuai once said: "The War to Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea eloquently proved that the era when Western invaders could occupy a country as long as they set up a few cannons on a coast in the East for hundreds of years is gone forever. , a nation that awakens and dares to fight for the glory, independence and security of the motherland is invincible."
In fact, the United States still does not realize this. They think that as long as they recruit a few bandits to form a bandit gang and threaten China, they will make China surrender and beg for mercy. But the fact is that the Chinese people and Chinese soldiers have to protect their homeland. To defend the country, to unite the country, and to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, we are never afraid of war. If the United States wants to intervene in the Chinese people's war to liberate Taiwan, it will only cause the United States to suffer a bloody blow and roll down the world. The altar of overlord, the Chinese nation will achieve great rejuvenation, China will achieve national reunification and become the most powerful country in the world. The Chinese people will be proud and proud, and the atmosphere of the Han and Tang Dynasties will surely return to the world.
NATO expands eastward to the Asia-Pacific, and China. We should attach great importance to and be vigilant and be prepared to respond, but don't be afraid. The great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation will not be achieved easily. It will inevitably have to go through the test of blood and fire. The Eighteen-Nation Alliance was defeated by China, and the Thirty-Eight Nations will come again. What about the coalition forces? Even if there are tens of thousands of people, I will go!
"In fact, the United States still does not realize this. They think that as long as they recruit a few bandits to form a bandit gang and threaten China, they will make China surrender and beg for mercy. But the fact is that the Chinese people and Chinese soldiers have to protect their homeland. To defend the country, to unite the country, and to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, we are never afraid of war. If the United States wants to intervene in the Chinese people's war to liberate Taiwan, it will only cause the United States to suffer a bloody blow and roll down the world. The altar of overlord, the Chinese nation will achieve great rejuvenation, China will achieve national reunification and become the most powerful country in the world. The Chinese people will be proud and proud, and the atmosphere of the Han and Tang Dynasties will surely return to the world.
NATO expands eastward to the Asia-Pacific, and China. We should attach great importance to and be vigilant and be prepared to respond, but don't be afraid. The great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation will not be achieved easily. It will inevitably have to go through the test of blood and fire. The Eighteen-Nation Alliance was defeated by China, and the Thirty-Eight Nations will come again. What about the coalition forces? Even if there are tens of thousands of people, I will go!
