-------------------------------------------------
I often hear people say There are no tigers in the mountains, but the monkey is called the king? I know that is a common saying, which means that there are no capable people, and ordinary people can also play important roles. But this sentence does not seem to be a sudden trend. The ancients always have a basis for it. Is the fighting power of monkeys really that strong? Why does it feel that the fighting power of monkeys is stronger than that of monkeys? There are many animals that can kill it.
Tiger is the king of beasts , and its combat power is indeed explosive, especially Siberian tiger As the largest feline , adult Siberian tiger males weigh an average of about 250 kilograms, and their head and body length are about 2.3 meters; in adults, The average weight of a female tiger is about 170 kilograms, the body length is about 2 meters, the shoulder height is about 1.1 meters, and the tail length is about 1.3 meters. The maximum length can reach 2.9 meters. From every data point of view, he is the king of beasts.
Monkeys as primates originated at the end of the Cretaceous period. Although they originated very early, monkeys have developed brains, their limbs can use simple tools and grab food, and their toes can separate, which helps climb branches and pick up things. However, both in terms of size and attack methods, he is obviously a few grades behind. In the face of absolute force, his wisdom may not play a big role.
---------------------------------------------
However, the ancients said: In the mountains Without tigers, monkeys are kings. It doesn’t feel like a random idea. What is the reason? Is it because it is similar to humans in some aspects?
