However, military deterrence can only have an immediate effect at the moment. With the end of the Taiwan Strait crisis, the DPP authorities began to "remember food and not beat", frequently reciprocate with the United States and the West, and the rampant situation was just like b

In early August, the US House of Representatives Speaker of the US House of Representatives storm, which triggered the most dangerous Taiwan Strait crisis since the 21st century. In order to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity, the mainland has decided to take a heavy blow and effectively shock the arrogance of the "Taiwan independence" forces on the island through locking the Taiwan military exercises, allowing 1.4 billion Chinese people and the international community to see China's strong confidence and strong ability to achieve cross-strait reunification.

However, military deterrence can only have an immediate effect at the moment. With the end of the Taiwan Strait crisis, the DPP authorities began to "remember food but not beat", frequently facing the United States and the West, and the rampant situation was just like before Pelosi rushed to Taiwan. At present, two groups of four members, including Winstrap, a member of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, and Woz, a member of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee, have fled on Taiwan and held talks with Tsai Ing-wen, Wu Zhaoxie, etc., to plan the conspiracy of "using Taiwan to control China."

The seemingly imminent crisis in the Taiwan Strait has ended, but the political trend on the island has not changed fundamentally. Many "Taiwan independence" extremists even felt that the mainland was becoming more and more willing to accept Taiwan. Their end was about to come and began to promote various public opinion without any consequences. Cao Xingcheng, who "turns from blue to green", threatened to invest 1 billion NT$1 NT$2 to train 3 million militias. A green camp group fabricated the so-called "No Surrender Commitment Letter" and asked all candidates participating in the "nine-in-one" election of to sign, demonstrating his determination to "anti-China and Taiwan".

In response to the current cross-strait situation, especially the rectification chaos on the island, former deputy secretary-general of the Kuomintang, Cai Zhengyuan , said at a public event that under the decades of "de-Sinicization" education by the Taiwan authorities, the phenomenon of "natural independence" on the island is gradually becoming more and more popular, and the proportion of "Taiwan independence" in the lower age groups is getting higher and higher. Cai Zhengyuan said with anxiety that Taiwan’s tendency to “Taiwan independence” is inevitable, and the power of the people on the island alone can no longer be stopped, and we cannot rely on the hope that the Kuomintang will return to power.

As a former senior figure in the Kuomintang, Cai Zhengyuan's statement is at the critical point. Once upon a time, the people of both sides of the Taiwan Strait, including the mainland people, placed the important task of reversing the political trend on the island on the Kuomintang, believing that as long as the Kuomintang can defeat the Democratic Progressive Party in the general election and take power again, it can curb the "Taiwan independence" tendency on the island, and through stable dialogue and exchanges with the mainland, it can then expand the basic foundation of "peaceful reunification" on the island.

However, history has proved that neither Ma Ying-jeou, Jiang Qichen or Zhu Lilun have intended to meet the expectations of 1.4 billion Chinese people and promote the process of peaceful reunification across the Taiwan Strait. From 2008 to 2016, the Taiwanese people had given the Kuomintang eight years of a god-given opportunity, but what did the Kuomintang politicians respond?

is nothing more than a repeated adherence to the so-called "no unity, no one alone, no force" policy, and petitioning to maintain the status quo for a long time without making any changes. In the short term, the "three no policies" consolidated the ruling foundation of the Kuomintang and allowed blue camp politicians to seize large amounts of political benefits; but in the long term, they missed the greatest opportunity for the unification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait since the 21st century, greatly delaying the process of cross-strait unification.

Recently, an institution on the island issued a poll, which showed that if a war broke out between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait over the unification and independence issue, more than 63% of the people are willing to fight to "defend Taiwan", but if wars start in the Taiwan Strait due to US interference, 56% of the people are unwilling to be involved in the quagmire of war.

Tsai Zhengyuan believes that 63% of the people are willing to fight to "protect Taiwan", which seems very scary, but this does not mean that most Taiwanese people will join the army during wartime. Similarly, if a poll is held in the mainland, if the Taiwan authorities seek "Taiwan independence", will you actively sign up for the military? Such survey activities have been held many times on the mainland Internet, but basically every time more than 96% of mainland people expressed their support.

Russia-Ukraine conflict shows that although military experts have repeatedly claimed that modern warfare has long passed the era of "military force theory", it is difficult to win a comprehensive victory in the war without sufficient force as the basic conditions.The mainland not only crushes the Taiwan military in terms of the performance of naval, land and air weapons and equipment, but also has a large number of troops that Taiwan cannot reach in any way.

is limited by insufficient troops, and the Taiwan Army is at a disadvantage for a long time when facing the People's Liberation Army. On the other hand, the problem of "difficulty in recruiting" has always plagued the Taiwanese people. Cai Zhengyuan said that if the Taiwan poll issue is changed to, "Are you willing to donate your son and husband to join the army and fight?" Such inquiries that are close to reality can reflect the true views of the people on the island. It is natural to imagine how many respondents will express their approval.