Lai Ching-te recently announced the suspension of construction of Shenzhen-Ao Power Plant, which was criticized by the outside world for its hairpin bends. Lai Ching-te then claimed that Shenzhen and Australia made the decision when Zhu Lilun was the "Vice President of the Execut

DPP New Taipei mayor candidate Su Zhenchang. (Photo source: Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News")

China Taiwan Network reported on October 15 that Lai Ching-te recently announced the suspension of construction of Shenzhen-Australia power plants, which was criticized by the outside world for hairpin bends. Lai Ching-te immediately claimed that Shenzhen-Australia made the decision when Zhu Lilun was the "Vice President of the Executive Yuan" when Zhu Lilun and were appointed as "Vice President of the Executive Yuan", which triggered mutual accusations between the two sides. According to Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News", the New Taipei City government issued a communiqué on the 15th to prove that the Shenzhen-Australia coal-fired power plant passed the environmental impact assessment on June 30, 2006, and was approved by the Executive Yuan on December 14. The content of the official documents showed that the approval time was during the term of Su Zhenchang's "Premier Prime Minister", "Su Zhenchang should not lie openly."

New Taipei City Environmental Protection Bureau Director Liu Heran said that he is sure that Lai Qingte is willing to stop the Shenzhen-Australia coal-fired power plant case, but the political saliva caused by the suspension of construction is unexpected. There are endless debates on who the Shenzhen-Australia coal-fired power plant is approved, but these are all documented, so why should we argue?

Liu Heran said that who made the decision in Shenzhen and Australia? The controversy began on August 3 this year. Su Zhenchang proposed in an interview on TV that "Shenya Power Plant was Zhu Lilun's ruling to be built when he was the 'Vice President of the Executive Yuan'. After being dug out the approved official document and found that it was approved by Su Zhenchang, on August 6, Su changed his words, "I hope I won't spit out the sip when the election is not available."

Liu Heran said that afterwards, he thought that taking out official documents would quell the dispute. Unexpectedly, when Lai Ching-te was interviewed on August 15, the case was proposed by Zhu Lilun. On August 16, Su Zhenchang changed to say that when he was the "Premier of the Executive Yuan", "the Shenzhen-Australia case was still in the 'Environmental Assessment' stage." I don’t know whether Su Zhenchang really forgot or deliberately blurred it. Now the words are written in black and white, which is decided by his position.

New Taipei City Government spokesman Zhang Qiqiang said, "Shen'ao coal-fired power plant has been in the office of Su Zhenchang's 'Director' from passing environmental impact assessment in 2006, approving the update and expansion plan of power , and preparing the budget." In other words, the old county magistrate actually knows the Shenzhen-ao coal-fired power plant very well. No wonder his position has always been ambiguous, because this is the decision he made during the term of "Premier Administrative". How could the old county magistrate deny himself and how could he slap his decision in the face? (China Taiwan Network Li Ning)