In February 2016, a murder case that violated human ethics shocked the whole country. After investigation, the police found that the murderer turned out to be Xie's only son - college student Wu Xieyu.

In February 2016, an murder case that violated human ethics shocked the whole country.

Xie, a teacher at a middle school in Fuzhou, was found dead in the teaching staff dormitory.

After the police investigation, they found that the murderer turned out to be Xie's only son - college student Wu Xieyu .

And as the investigation deepens, more thought-provoking truths emerge.

What is surprising is first Wu Xieyu's cruel means of committing the crime;

It turns out that he sneaked into the other party with dumbbells while his mother was not paying attention, and finally smashed his mother to death. The picture is unimaginable...

What is even more terrifying is his calmness after finishing the crime;

After committing the crime, he wrapped the body with the prepared charcoal to prevent the smell from leaking out.

At the same time, he also wrote a resignation letter to the school in his mother's name and invited his mother's colleagues to attend the "resignation banquet".

This is more than that. He also borrowed 1.44 million yuan from his relatives and friends in the name of studying abroad as a fund for escape.

While Wu Xieyu used the money to go to prostitution along the road, his mother's body was not found in the dormitory until 7 months after the incident...

The details of this ethical homicide case make people breathe.

Recently, this large-scale murder has been brought to the TV screen.

In the recent plot of the national drama " Bottom Line ", a case based on the Wu Xieyu case appeared.

In the play, college student Tang Xiaoyun looks gentle and humble to his mother on the surface, and looks like a child with both academic performance and good academic performance.

But when he returned home, he took advantage of the other party's unpreparedness and took the trophy to attack his mother...

This scene is just like Wu Xieyu in reality...

While this "disguised good child" commits a crazy crime, the certificate of good students on the wall forms a huge irony.

After restoring the prototype with the extreme reality, the large-scale "Bottom Line" dared to shoot has aroused discussion among netizens.

As the comments reflect, has been broadcasting since mid-month, and the "Bottom Line" with the theme of court trials has received enthusiastic responses.

on the satellite TV platform, log in to Hunan Satellite TV 's "Bottom Line" won multiple firsts in a row.

, which includes the highest number of live broadcasts for 8 consecutive days.

on the online broadcast platform, the cumulative playback volume exceeded 300 million in 10 days and the 8 consecutive popular champions also showed the drama's king attributes.

Even more than 10 official media including Xinhua News Agency , Guangming Daily , have joined the ranks of CALL and praised the production of "Bottom Line".

So, how many advantages does such a national drama that even the official media praise? Below

, let’s talk about it along the plot of the first 20 episodes.

Highlight 1: Really dare to shoot, don’t avoid the standard shooting of real cases

This drama starring Jin Dong , Cai Wenjing , Wang Jinsong , Zhang Zhijian and other veteran actors help the scene. The most distinctive advantage is: dare to shoot.

It is no exaggeration to say that this can be said to be the ceiling of the scale of the Chinese drama.

After in-depth field research by more than 60 courts and 20 draft scripts that took three years to revise 20 drafts, "Bottom Line" included more than 50 real cases into the play. In the plot, the actual cases are restored to the screen in another way around the process of the judge Fang Yuan (played by Jin Dong) and his apprentice Ye Xin (played by Cai Wenjing).

. In the process of reproducing them, the screenwriter also timely demonstrated another idea of ​​court trial.

For example, the best friend blocking the knife case in the play (the prototype comes from the Jiang Ge case) ;

In the play, urban woman Mu Ziqing died because she was involved in a dispute between her best friend and her ex-boyfriend.

When the incident occurred, facing the ex-boyfriend who came with a knife, her best friend avoided her because she closed the door but objectively caused Mu Ziqing to be blocked outside the door.

In the end, this caused Mu Ziqing to be stabbed to death for more than ten consecutive times.

From a moral perspective, the behavior of the best friend caused public opinion, and the husband of the deceased even filed a lawsuit against him to "deprive his right to life".

, and public opinion once accused my best friend of "let his friends block the knife", and the public opinion was very stirring. Even the male protagonist Fang Yuan's wife joined the "Internet Trial Army".

But the judge and the collegial panel were not influenced by public opinion.

On the contrary, they make judgments based on facts rather than moral perspectives.

After investigating the evidence , Fang Yuan found that his best friend knew that his ex-boyfriend would take revenge, but did not clearly inform the deceased of danger.

combined with multiple evidence, Fang Yuan determined that his best friend had obvious fault in the death of the deceased.

At the same time, the deliberately ruling remarks afterwards also brought great emotional harm to the deceased husband.

From the two perspectives of "dividing responsibility" and "emotional injury", Fang Yuan punished the other party to bear part of the civil compensation.

This well-founded judgment also reflects the credibility of the court.

Another example: the murder case of saving the mother in the first episode ( prototype was from Yu Huan's intentional injury case);

In the drama, the young Lei Xingyu took up a fruit knife and stabbed the other party to death after witnessing his mother being forced by the debt collector by misleading methods.

Since the defendant's motive for murder is to protect his mother, most public opinion chooses to sympathize with him.

But behind the case, the screenwriter also throws us at another angle of the problem.

As the investigation deepened, the court confirmed on that the debt collector oppressed and insulted Lei Xingyu and his son , and also found that Lei Xingyu had misjudgment on the dangerous situation.

In fact, the direct purpose of the debt collector is to collect debts, and no one of the peers used the tools.

After the debt collector exposes his lower body and tries to insult Lei Xingyu's mother, someone around him stops it in time.

More importantly, the time point for Lei Xingyu to take out his knife was 20 minutes after the "insulting behavior" was terminated.

The presiding officer also determined that the possibility of Lei Xingyu and his son being in danger of their lives was very low at this time, and the knife-taking behavior was unnecessary.

Although the motive for protecting the mother is understandable, Lei Xingyu took out a knife and injured people without his life being threatened. It is obvious that has excessive defense.

Therefore, Lei Xingyu was sentenced to 5 years in prison, which is also consistent with the actual prototype.

Judging from the above cases, the screenwriter has also cleared away the public opinion atmosphere and interpreted the rationality of each ruling for us.

Another example is the case of mother murder mentioned at the beginning of the article.

"Bottom Line" also restores this tragedy of mother murder while bringing perspective to the educational issues behind it.

It turns out that behind the "elite education" that children have received since childhood, there is also severe growth and oppression.

Not only will he be scolded if he gets 99 points, he will be criticized if he plays games, which also invisibly suppresses the child's mind.

The screenwriter here also deliberately left blank space, implying the potential impact of "educational problems" on children's psychology.

While restoring social cases on a large scale, the bottom line also brings us thoughts on social issues, and the pattern becomes higher as we look at it.

Highlight 2: Really bold and talk about more real social issues

Another highlight of "Bottom Line" is also to put some sensitive social issues on the table to chat.

The first question: workplace sexual harassment;

The Li Fangning case in the play is a typical example.

Li Fangning, a workplace woman in a backless outfit, filed accusation of sexual harassment against the other party because her colleague touched her once.

For this reason, she was considered a big deal by the company's senior management, and even her mother tried to stop her.

plus Li Fangning has a direct competition opportunity with this colleague, which once questioned Li Fangning's motives.

But as the plot deepens , the male protagonist Fang Yuan gradually discovered after investigation that this lawsuit is more like a qualitative change after quantitative change.

It turns out that Li Fangning, who loves dressing on weekdays, is often "took differently" after joining the company.

Not only did she encounter colleagues and bosses who intentionally or unintentionally, but she also had a certain sense of frivolity in her words.

In the early stage, her tolerant colleagues regarded this as the other party's acquiescence. Until Li Fangning couldn't bear it, the other party criticized it in the name of "fake seriousness and green tea".

, which is not "indulged" with small evil. Li Fangning's case encourages women who have similar experiences to say no bravely. The second issue of

is also very impressive.

It is also related to workplace sexual harassment, but it comes from the opposite, talking about workplace sexual false accusations.

Another case, the company boss played by Yin Xiaotian was accused of sexual harassment by female subordinate Momo.

Although Momo did not provide evidence , under his pitiful cry, the huge gap in status between the two sides made the audience subconsciously fall into the perspective of "the defendant is guilty".

But the judge found some clues from the fact that Momo flashed his expression and the fact that he sued after being fired.

It turns out that Momo has been deliberately contacting his boss since he joined the company, but he was avoided by the other party who had a family.

Taking advantage of the fact that her boss got drunk after a banquet, she was alone with her partner and pretended to claim that she had an affair with her boss, so she threatened to get promoted.

Although the boss always keeps himself clean, he is a little embarrassed when the accusation comes first.

After the surveillance video is retrieved and the truth is revealed.

Momo also has his own theory:

As a young man, I have achieved nothing, so I have to find the right person to work hard.

For this reason, the screenwriter also responded bitterly through the judge's mouth:

It is because you have too many ideas like this that some misunderstandings are deepened...

I have to say that the screenwriter dares to say it!

For example, the sudden death of the anchor in the play, which exposed multiple social problems;

The sudden death of the female anchor Luo Youyou after broadcasting it live, and the screenwriter revealed the unbearable social reality. On the other hand,

, is Luo Youyou's agency advocates overtime culture on the grounds that "money never sleeps".

After the other party died suddenly at high intensity work, he also actively marketed his account to gain traffic benefits from it.

On the other hand, is Luo Youyou's family's concept of " prefers boys over girls ".

After hearing that her daughter died, her mother made trouble and claimed compensation, but she did not mention any words about her daughter forcing her to save 200,000 yuan for her brother before her death.

even, she responded on the grounds that "I want money, my daughter won't die in vain."

This real and suffocating picture has once again sparked heated discussion in the comment area.

According to incomplete statistics, 15 cases of all sizes have appeared in the first 20 episodes of "Bottom Line", which has triggered social discussions in all aspects.

Highlight 3: Realistic, restore the appearance of the court work

Another thing that must be mentioned is that "Bottom Line" has done a great job in restoring the appearance of the court work.

During the popular period, many court official accounts posted their friends circle:

"Bottom Line" is like surveillance for me.

After the screenwriter visited more than 60 courts, the screenwriter restored the real court workers very well.

The first restoration: systematically reproduce the court organizational structure.

As the plot deepens, the audience also understands the functions of various internal institutions of the courts.

For example, the filing court where the male protagonist is located .

Borrowing the lines of the characters in the play, the filing court was teased as "the one who is watching the door".

But the joke is just a joke, but this evaluation also points out the attributes of the filing court as the first window of the court to the outside world.

The main responsibility of the filing court is to be responsible for the filing registration and review of cases in the whole court, and to determine whether the court filed an appeal based on the effectiveness of pre-trial mediation.

Due to direct contact with the parties, this requires the filing court staff to have strong communication skills.

In the drama, the male protagonist Fang Yuan, played by Jin Dong, has excellent communication skills, and many conflicts are resolved in a timely manner under his pre-trial mediation.

For example, when dealing with a certain clothing dispute, he used his three-inch tongue to tell the buyer and seller each to make concessions.

On the one hand, let the seller give a big discount card, and on the other hand, let the buyer give up the lawsuit after receiving part of the compensation. The peacemaker is quite professional...

In addition to the filing court, the drama also systematically presents the structural functions of multiple chambers.

Civil Court 1 , also known as Civil Litigation Court 1 , is responsible for the trial of marriage, family, and labor dispute cases.

includes civil court 2 responsible for commercial cases, and civil court 3 responsible for intellectual property rights is also expected to be displayed one by one in the subsequent plot.

The second restoration is the daily life of court staff;

Court work is not as serious as the outside world thinks, and it is even somewhat similar to workplace workers. On the side of

, the two protagonists of gave each other a private bone preparation package while they were tired... On the side of

, the male protagonist Fang Yuan appreciated the clerk of the Civil First Court, half-joking and half-seriously poached:

Come to our court to work!

even has "overtime comments" similar to those of the workplace workers, such as the male protagonist's sentence:

(this period) guarantees no rest on Saturday, and no rest on Sunday.

The third place restoration, thinking about the real case trial process.

Although the court workers are the protagonists, "Bottom Line" does not deliberately raise the protagonist's halo, but instead portrays the realistic thinking of court workers based on the law itself.

For example, in the unit where the female anchor Luo Youyou died suddenly.

includes the brokerage company and Luo Youyou's family make a big fuss about "Luo Youyou's death" and try to make profits.

Ye Xin, the newcomer in the court who handled the case, was indignant about this chaos.

, and the male protagonist Fang Yuan woke up the other party with a realistic speech:

I smelled a smell of personal heroism, you think you are too important.

As long as they do not violate the law, we have no right to interfere.

Of course, this does not mean that the judge has no temperature at all.

In the final trial, Fang Yuan also secretly advised the parties involved with a generous speech from "Man is not a machine, he also needs rest."

The law is ruthless, but people can be warm.

Through various detailed depictions, the original appearance of the work of grassroots courts is truly restored.

Highlight 4: Very "study", Jin Dong led more than ten powerful

In addition to the real plot, the actor's acting skills also add to the texture of the whole drama.

Just mention a scene and you can create three acting schools.

Such as Jin Dong, Wang Jinsong and Zhang Zhijian's scene in the same frame.

The story background happened after the male protagonist Jin Dong made a speech at a meeting. After the meeting, he was called to the office by his teacher and vice dean (played by Zhang Zhijian) to scold him...

knew that he couldn't help but scold him, and the witty male protagonist also called his colleague Chen Kang (played by Wang Jinsong).

In the early stage, he told the story seriously, as if he was about to say something big.

But as the three words "to be scolded" blurted out, the style of painting instantly reversed, and the smooth attributes of the character appeared.

On the other hand, Wang Jinsong also showed the helplessness of the character "on boarding the pirate ship" by using conditioned reflexes and subconsciously scolding.

Wang Jinsong, who is used to playing the role of a black-hearted person, this time he plays a down-to-earth judge, but his style is also very interesting.

Immediately afterwards, it was Zhang Zhijian, the acting leader who played the vice president, who was the turn of the actor.

After pushing open the door, he instantly stood up with a sarcastic scolding.

Throughout these few minutes of critical drama, Zhang Zhijian used language offensive with body movements to show the leadership majesty of the character in one go.

Even if Wang Jinsong's character tried to run away and was stopped by him, he could feel the full murderousness through the screen...

This extremely domineering way of appearance left a deep impression on people.

In just ten minutes of play, the performance of these three acting schools is quite outstanding.

Of course, besides the three of them, there are many outstanding characters in the supporting roles.

includes Wang Yinan who plays clerk Wang Jie, with a whole thoughtful and kind-hearted attitude.

plays the role of the old man who appeals to the old man Bi Yanjun , and the old man's posture is also very vivid.

Yue Yang appears, the funny style also instantly overflows...

includes Liu Mintao , Zuo Xiaoqing , Li Naiwen and other powerful acting players in the subsequent plots also further improve the acting content of this drama.

or above is the highlight of the first 20 episodes of this "Bottom Line".

Whether it is a real restoration of well-known cases such as " Jiang Ge Case", " Wu Xieyu's mother-killing case " , or amplified discussions on social issues such as workplace sexual harassment, live broadcast ecology, and blood-sucking families, they all reflect the courage of "Bottom Line"...

Plus the outstanding performance of more than 10 acting schools, "Bottom Line" can reproduce the real life of legal workers with a clear style.

I dare to assert that such good dramas not only stand at the ceiling of the scale of Chinese dramas, but also maintain the bottom line of good domestic dramas!

Bluestone Movie | Lelede

This article is the original content of Bluestone Movie. Please do not reprint