Jinzi Ham issued an announcement on April 10 stating that the company received a "Notice of Case" from the China Securities Regulatory Commission. Due to suspected illegal and irregular information disclosure, the China Securities Regulatory Commission decided to file a case against the company. On April 11, opened , that is, hit the limit . Zhongchao Holdings also received the "Previous Notice of Administrative Penalty and Market Ban" on April 1, because of the concealment of progress in the transfer of control, the failure to disclose the 600 million guarantee lawsuit, and the signing of a false procurement contract made the actual controller occupy 69 million yuan in violation of regulations. Faced with the frequent "incidence of listed companies" in which listed companies are frequently exposed, can investors only act as "big injustice" in stock trading?
Accounts for shareholders have been compensated
Jiangsu Suyan Law Firm Lawyer Ding told Yangzi Evening News /Zi Niu News reporter that Article 85 of the " Securities Law " clearly stipulates that: The information disclosure obligor fails to disclose information in accordance with the regulations, or the announced securities issuance documents, periodic reports, temporary reports and other information disclosure funds If there are false records, misleading statements or major omissions, causing investors to suffer losses in securities transactions, the information disclosure obligor shall bear the liability for compensation; the issuer's controlling shareholder, actual controller, directors, supervisors, senior management and other directly responsible persons, as well as the sponsor, securities companies underwriting and their directly responsible persons, shall bear the joint and several liability for compensation with the issuer, except where it can prove that they are not at fault. In addition, Supreme People's Court also has corresponding judicial interpretations to determine the specific conditions for claiming compensation. Therefore, from a legal perspective, if shareholders suffer losses due to violations of information disclosure by listed companies, false statements and other behaviors, shareholders have the right to sue and claim compensation in accordance with the law.
"Similar to the violation of information disclosure of Jinzi Ham, investors who meet the conditions have the right to sue and claim compensation." Lawyer Ding said that from the practical level of claims, there are also a large number of shareholders who have received compensation, such as the Sanfangxiang and Huanrui Century cases she has handled. The investors eventually received certain compensation and made up for some of the losses.
"A-share good father-in-law" incident ushered in the subsequent
Golden font ham "A-share good father-in-law" incident has become a hot search. On January 27, Jinzi Ham issued an announcement to correct the third quarter report of 2021. The reason was that Jinzi Ham traders suffered losses of 55105349 yuan in the company's futures hedging business due to illegal operations by futures traders. The traders compensated the company for the loss of 55105349 yuan, but there were errors in the relevant accounting treatment and corrected them. To this end, Jinzi Ham received a regulatory measure decision from the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau on March 10.
Netizens found that the "half million yuan loss" that the trader had caused was solved by his father-in-law Shi Xiongbiao: Shi Xiongbiao temporarily borrowed 41.05 million yuan from his friend Wang Qihui (Vice President of Jinzi Ham) and occupied 5.95 million yuan of child support from his brother Shi Yanjun (President of Jinzi Ham). Netizens joked that this trader has a "good father-in-law". Even if the "half-million-year loss" was filled out, Jinzi Ham and Shi Yanjun and Wang Qihui and other main responsible persons were still under the supervision measures of issuing a warning letter to show education by the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau.
But to investors' surprise, on April 8, , the China Securities Regulatory Commission, , filed a case against Jinzi Ham again for "suspected information disclosure violations". What other information disclosure violations have not been disclosed in Jinzi Ham? These will not be announced until the CSRC's investigation results are found.
Jinzi Ham was investigated again and its stock price was set. Lawyer Ding said that investors can also actively file claims, after all, only by claiming can you have hope of compensation. Based on the current information, it can be preliminarily determined that the stocks that meet the claims are: those bought from August 24, 2021 to January 26, 2022 and still held on January 26, 2021, and those that were bought before April 10, 2022 and still held at the close of the day. Lawyer Ding said that the claims conditions may be adjusted in the future based on the investigation conclusions of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, but shareholders do not need to pay any attorney fees before receiving compensation, which greatly reduces the cost of rights protection. Stock investors can now prepare for litigation. For details, please contact Lawyer Ding 13072529702 for consultation.
Zhongchao Holdings' claim conditions are clear
"Many investors have concerns, but in fact they do not need to pay attorney fees before receiving compensation.Moreover, if investors want to get compensation, they must first actively advocate, and listed companies will not actively compensate shareholders. "Lawyer Ding reminded.
Zhongchao Holdings' claims conditions are clear, and investors need to actively sue before they can get compensation. Lawyer Ding explained that according to the Securities Law, the "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Trial of Civil Compensation Cases of False Statements in the Securities Market" and other laws and regulations, according to the illegal facts of Zhongchao Holdings, shareholders who bought from March 29, 2019 to November 22, 2021 and still held on the closing of the 22nd will meet the requirements for the claim. What is the specific You can contact Lawyer Ding for consultation.
CSRC found that there were three information disclosure violations in China Super League Holdings. The progress of the transfer of control was not disclosed in accordance with the law. In September 2017, China Super League Group and Shenzhen Xintenghua reached a share transfer. If the actual controller of China Super League Holdings was successfully fulfilled, it would become Shenzhen Xintenghua. However, the share transfer was terminated because Shenzhen Xintenghua did not pay the share transfer payment on time, and China Super League Holdings did not truthfully disclose the termination of the agreement. .
Zhongchao Holdings failed to disclose major litigation situations in a timely manner in accordance with the law. From July to August 2018, Huang Jinguang, the then chairman and actual controller, provided guarantees for multiple debts of himself, related parties and other related parties in the name of Zhongchao Holdings. Zhongchao Holdings received 28 lawsuits for the aforementioned guarantee matters, with a total amount involved in the case of 609.4831 million yuan. On December 5, 2018, Zhongchao Holdings received a lawsuit filed by Shenzhen Xintenghua for the company's request to revoke the resolution of the shareholders' meeting. The above two lawsuits of China Super League Holdings were not disclosed in a timely manner in accordance with the law.
In addition, there were major omissions in the 2018 annual report of China Super League Holdings. From March to May 2018, Nantong Quanen, Chongqing Xinyouda and China Super League Holdings signed a false procurement contract with China Super League Holdings, which raised 70 million yuan, of which 69.74 million yuan was determined to be Huang Jinguang's non-operating occupation of China Super League Holdings' funds. Later, China Super League Holdings was sued and was asked to bear the total of the capital, interest, lawyer's fees, etc. on behalf of Huang Jinguang. 74.4886 million yuan. As of the date of punishment, Huang Jinguang did not return the above funds to China Super League Holdings.
In view of the above illegal and irregular behaviors of China Super League Holdings and the actual controller Huang Jinguang, Securities Regulatory Bureau intends to decide to impose a fine of 2.2 million yuan on China Super League Holdings and Huang Jinguang and other responsible personnel, and plans to take 5-year ban on securities markets against Huang Jinguang, of which Huang Jinguang was fined 900,000 yuan.
Yangtze Evening News/Zi Niu News Reporter Xu Jing
Proofreading Faye Wong
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-