Movie Screenshot
What is huge profits? This is - According to the Paper, on July 16, Ms. Wang from Jinhua, Zhejiang said that she printed a support obligation agreement without the official seal at the office of Zhenxiong, Yunnan, and was charged 1,000 yuan without a receipt.
After that, a handling notice sent to the media by the Party Working Committee of Zhenxiong County in Zhejiang stated that when the staff accepted the materials, they did not hand over to the legal service agency for mediation according to procedures, and there were acts of writing documents and charging fees, which was a "personal behavior". They collected them on behalf of the staff on behalf of lawyers of third-party legal institutions.
At first glance, Ms. Wang’s money was also refunded, and the compensation for the mistaken bus was also given. The staff involved were also seriously criticized and educated, and the matter was almost done. But there are explanations for individuals, but the questions left to the public have not yet been eliminated.
First, if you print the support obligation agreement, why do you still need to charge "third-party lawyer fees"? As for common sense, the contract for raising obligations is a formatted document, and the focus of the agreement is on the expression of the true wishes of both parties. The divorce agreement has become, and an agreement has been reached for the son's obligation to raise his son. It's just printed it and there is no need for mediation. Where does the "third-party lawyer fee" come from? It's so expensive that even "Luoyang Paper" feel ashamed of it?
After all, the problem in this matter is not only too expensive, but also collecting it on behalf of others, but also "injustice" and it is suspected of random collection.
Secondly, "the staff collects it on behalf of the lawyers of third-party legal institutions" is also full of complaints. Where can the office staff be qualified to collect on behalf of the legal agency? Is it reasonable to carry out the "writing and collection" business during working hours? Isn’t it worth being wary of if civil servants have such business “connections” with third-party legal institutions? The handling notice given by the relevant parties of
states that this is a "personal behavior." But just like the principle of "expressive agent", collecting money like this in work clothes at the office during working hours represents not only an individual, but is inevitably regarded as a job.
is not known at present, how long and how many people involved have collected "collected" on their behalf, and whether they have received "commissions" from them, but it is hard to believe that this is the first time, after all, this time it was exposed. The staff of the Foreign Office involved in the incident, blatantly relying on "Secret" to act, was just "seriously criticized and educated", which is also called "serious"... Sorry, I smiled.
Nowadays, the central government has explicitly prohibited administrative charges. Against this background, it is also quite rampant to still dare to print an agreement in the Foreign Office to charge 1,000 yuan, which would give people a sense of "administrative charges" and it is also quite rampant. As for this chaos, it is obvious that it is necessary to deal with it seriously, rather than to hold it high and lightly.
□Ma Diming (media person)
Edit Chen Jing Proofreading Li Lijun
