Text | Chen Jingsheng
As the saying goes, "the upper beam is not straight, the lower beam is crooked." After DPP leader Tsai Ing-wen was accused of being a "fake doctor," which aroused widespread public attention, her confidants - former Hsinchu Hsinchu Mayor Lin Zhijian and outgoing Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan were exposed to plagiarism in their papers one after another, and their degrees were revoked.
Now the verdict of Tsai Ing-wen's "thesis scandal" has been released. On the island of Taiwan where the DPP authorities almost "cover the sky with one hand", the Taipei District Court openly shielded her. This result made one of the whistleblowers Peng Wenzheng very angry. He couldn't help but choked: When the case reaches the second trial, he will be beaten into a pig's head!
The verdict of Tsai Ing-wen’s “thesis scandal” is out
Three Taiwanese professors, Lin Huanqiang, Peng Wenzheng and He Defen, have been pursuing the truth about Tsai Ing-wen’s “fake doctor” since 2019. Now several years have passed, even though her doctoral thesis is full of problems and doubts, Tsai Ing-wen still refuses to let go of the matter and does not admit the relevant accusations. Even in order to avoid reporters' questioning, she has not been interviewed in public schedules for almost two years.
However, Peng Wenzheng and others have not given up. Not long ago, they filed a lawsuit with the Taipei District Court to "confirm the non-existence of Tsai Ing-wen's doctoral thesis". After the first-instance judgment was dismissed, the case was sent back to the lower court for a new trial by the High Court. However, in the first instance of the Taipei District Court, the lawsuit of the plaintiff Peng Wenzheng was dismissed.
The Taipei District Court is undoubtedly showing naked favoritism and cover-up. The relevant judgment stated: After the judge's "in-court inspection", the paper presented by Tsai Ing-wen could be judged from the yellowing degree of the paper to be a long time ago. Although the paper is in bulk form and does not meet the binding requirements of a formal paper, it can be regarded as an "original paper". Therefore, the related accusations that Tsai Ing-wen is a “fake doctor” are not valid. The judge in this case, Zhang Yonghui, also threatened that the official doctoral thesis could not be found in the London School of Economics and Political Science . This was a problem of improper preservation, and the responsibility did not lie with Tsai Ing-wen herself.
Peng Wenzheng is dissatisfied with the verdict: he will be beaten into a pig’s head
This verdict is completely aimed at clearing Tsai Ing-wen’s name, and even dumps the blame on relevant institutions in order to exonerate Tsai Ing-wen.
In this regard, Peng Wenzheng said that Judge Zhang Yonghui showed several major innovations to the outside world when hearing the case. One of the first initiatives was to use rhetorical debate to prove the existence of Tsai Ing-wen’s doctoral thesis. This is a major breakthrough in legal science in the 21st century. The second pioneering work of is that it does not use the carbon 14 detection method and can "identify" this is an "original paper" with the naked eye. It is a major invention in archeology in the 21st century. The third initiative of is to deduce the completion of a formal paper in bulk form. This is a major revision of the deduction method in the 21st century!
Peng Wenzheng further sarcastically said that the result of this judgment is "convincing". It only took the judge three years to find the paper that had been lost for 39 years, which is "unique in the world." He bluntly said that none of this nonsense would be tenable in the second instance. When the time comes, Zhang Yonghui and the relevant judgments will be severely slapped in the face, and may even be "beaten into a pig's head."
In fact, there are many doubts about Tsai Ing-wen’s doctorate degree. In addition to the essay, her oral exam was also pointed out as a fictional plot. Because the direct flight from Taiwan to London is nearly 9,700 kilometers, the flight time back then was as long as 15 hours. If she only leaves on Saturday to participate in the oral examination on Sunday, it will be an almost impossible task.
What’s even more questionable is that Tsai Ing-wen has kept her thesis “secret” for 30 years. Isn’t this a guilty conscience?
Copyright statement: This article is an original article by the author. The picture information comes from the Internet. Unauthorized illegal reproduction of the text content of this article is strictly prohibited. If you need to reprint or quote, you must obtain the author's consent and indicate the source.
