After reading the title of this article, I believe many readers have understood -
Prayut , this time it is really a big deal...
Indeed, the end of the Thai general election marks the arrival of the "new government" era.
However, the "new government" is new, all cabinet members are replaced and reshuffled, while Prime Minister Prayut is still Prime Minister Prayut. The "new" here can only mean that the temporary military government no longer exists and the democratic model returns to politics.
During this period, from the public's questioning the election results to the debate in the House of Congress, the opposition party's tit-for-tat-tat-the progress of the Prayut camp seemed to be accompanied by endless verbal battles, and was in a dilemma.
Recently, the Prayutian government has once again become the focus of hot discussions across Thailand. Unlike the previous "verb wars", the two major keywords of this incident have risen to [Tenth Kings] and [Constitution].
At the same time, some Thai people began to question: "If Prayut handles this matter improperly, can the government under its leadership be said to be equivalent to invalid?"
The "this matter" mentioned by the people will start from July 16, 2019.
On the same day, Prayut led the new government cabinet members to the election, wore dresses, based on the highest etiquette in Thailand, and in accordance with the Thai Constitution, they were sworn in under the witness of His Majesty Maha Vajiralongkorn, the 10th King of the Bangkok Dynasty, and His Highness Suthida. The background of this scene is actually easy to understand -
Thailand's former Chairman of the Privy Council (Regent, late) General Bing Tingsula Nuan once interpreted the relationship between king and politics: "A government is managed and supervised by soldiers and cabinet politicians, but the real master should be the supreme and noble King His Majesty."
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 Therefore, the oath-taking ceremony is crucial to the new government. The main content of the oath of
is mainly based on "I am willing to represent this government (swear)". It openly declares and promises one by one, including tribute to the king's royal family, loyalty and duty, protecting the country, and fighting for the people.
Then, the oath ceremony was carried out in an orderly manner, but the final result was as stated in the title of this article:
"In front of the 10th King of Thailand, Prayut's inauguration oath was not finished"
and it is not only as simple as "not finished reading".
"Prayuth's oath of office is related to the king and the constitutional provisions, but not only did he not read the original text of the oath of office, he also privately added and tampered with the content of the oath."
"This is a blatant violation of the Supreme Democratic Constitution. We will request the Constitutional Court to intervene and report the matter to the national supervisory department at the same time." Mr. Xi Suwan, secretary of the Constitutional Maintenance Organization of Thailand (4th of the left below), said in an interview on August 5.
Obviously, "Offering Oath" is an important part clearly stipulated in the Constitution of Thailand. It is a necessary procedure for the establishment of a new government. It represents that the old government has become history and the new leadership members take office.
Article 161 of the Constitution of Thailand also clearly states that the Prime Minister should complete the inauguration ceremony under the witness of the king.
So, what consequences will occur after Prayut fail to read the oath?
Prayut responded: "Don't care about these details! Don't make things big! I really didn't mean it!"
Soon, the news that Prayut had not completely swore to the king of the tenth generation spread throughout Thailand. The keyword tag of
#Offering the oath# (ถวายสัตย์ปฏิญาณไม่ครบถ้วน) also occupies major online media platforms, and there are constant speculations from all walks of life -
"What does it mean? Illegal constitution? So blatant?"
"If you don't finish taking the oath, you mean that you are unwilling to accept the new constitution, and then the new government is not qualified to take office. After reading the title of this article, I believe many readers have understood - Prayut , this time it is really a big deal... Indeed, the end of the Thai general election marks the arrival of the "new government" era. However, the "new government" is new, all cabinet members are replaced and reshuffled, while Prime Minister Prayut is still Prime Minister Prayut. The "new" here can only mean that the temporary military government no longer exists and the democratic model returns to politics. During this period, from the public's questioning the election results to the debate in the House of Congress, the opposition party's tit-for-tat-tat-the progress of the Prayut camp seemed to be accompanied by endless verbal battles, and was in a dilemma. Recently, the Prayutian government has once again become the focus of hot discussions across Thailand. Unlike the previous "verb wars", the two major keywords of this incident have risen to [Tenth Kings] and [Constitution]. At the same time, some Thai people began to question: "If Prayut handles this matter improperly, can the government under its leadership be said to be equivalent to invalid?" The "this matter" mentioned by the people will start from July 16, 2019. On the same day, Prayut led the new government cabinet members to the election, wore dresses, based on the highest etiquette in Thailand, and in accordance with the Thai Constitution, they were sworn in under the witness of His Majesty Maha Vajiralongkorn, the 10th King of the Bangkok Dynasty, and His Highness Suthida. The background of this scene is actually easy to understand - Thailand's former Chairman of the Privy Council (Regent, late) General Bing Tingsula Nuan once interpreted the relationship between king and politics: "A government is managed and supervised by soldiers and cabinet politicians, but the real master should be the supreme and noble King His Majesty." 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 Therefore, the oath-taking ceremony is crucial to the new government. The main content of the oath of is mainly based on "I am willing to represent this government (swear)". It openly declares and promises one by one, including tribute to the king's royal family, loyalty and duty, protecting the country, and fighting for the people. Then, the oath ceremony was carried out in an orderly manner, but the final result was as stated in the title of this article: "In front of the 10th King of Thailand, Prayut's inauguration oath was not finished" and it is not only as simple as "not finished reading". "Prayuth's oath of office is related to the king and the constitutional provisions, but not only did he not read the original text of the oath of office, he also privately added and tampered with the content of the oath." "This is a blatant violation of the Supreme Democratic Constitution. We will request the Constitutional Court to intervene and report the matter to the national supervisory department at the same time." Mr. Xi Suwan, secretary of the Constitutional Maintenance Organization of Thailand (4th of the left below), said in an interview on August 5. Obviously, "Offering Oath" is an important part clearly stipulated in the Constitution of Thailand. It is a necessary procedure for the establishment of a new government. It represents that the old government has become history and the new leadership members take office. Article 161 of the Constitution of Thailand also clearly states that the Prime Minister should complete the inauguration ceremony under the witness of the king. So, what consequences will occur after Prayut fail to read the oath? Prayut responded: "Don't care about these details! Don't make things big! I really didn't mean it!" Soon, the news that Prayut had not completely swore to the king of the tenth generation spread throughout Thailand. The keyword tag of #Offering the oath# (ถวายสัตย์ปฏิญาณไม่ครบถ้วน) also occupies major online media platforms, and there are constant speculations from all walks of life - "What does it mean? Illegal constitution? So blatant?" "If you don't finish taking the oath, you mean that you are unwilling to accept the new constitution, and then the new government is not qualified to take office." " If you are sworn in after the constitutional procedure is completed, this government will be invalid..." " Please respond! Your Excellency the Prime Minister, otherwise we will doubt when? ! " under public opinion, Prime Minister Prayut still responded. response is divided into two stages, two attitudes. responds to the first stage: "Don't make things bigger! " It is reported that the incident began to ferment on the evening of July 16, and Prayut never responded to it for July. It was not until August 5 that Prayut officially talked about this matter in the face of the storm of questions from the political circles to the people: "What I want to make clear is that my oath has covered all the key points and meanings that need to be expressed (ครอบคลุ��), everything is implemented in accordance with the royal etiquette process, everything I do is for the people, which is consistent with the original intention of the Constitution! " "Don't care about the details, don't make this matter big, don't over-misunderstand it leads to turmoil in the country. If you pay too much attention to issues such as "good or bad", then just wait for the next election! ” (อย่าให้การเมืองทำประเทศชาติปั่นวน ถ้าจะดีหรือไ่ม่ดีอย่างไร ก็ไปรอเลือกตั้งคราวหน้าแล้วกัน...... ) Prayut responded to the second phase: I did not intentionally! On August 7, 2019, Bangkok local time at 13:00, Prayut talked about this matter again during his inspection in Tainan Yera Province and made a brief response: "I did not intentionally, I did not intentionally, we should pay attention to the motivation and consciousness of the behavior itself (เจตนา), right? " From the attitude of the two stages, it is not difficult to find that in the "swearing is not completed" incident, Prime Minister Prayut is more of a "explanation" to respond to the cause of the incident, or to guide the public to view the matter. It is worth noting that there is no apology or judgment on the nature of the behavior. But for Thai media and scholars who are paying attention to this matter, they hope that the authorities can make a clear "right and wrong" decision on this matter and bear the corresponding consequences. escape will only increase the public's dissatisfaction and may make the incident more complicated. Bay former spokesperson Paisen: Prayut's move shows that the highest privilege "Linxian 44" is still there, and the military government peacekeeping committee is still there... August 6, 2019, Mr. Paisen, former spokesperson of Thailand's Deputy Prime Minister Paisen said in an interview: "Prayut has not finished reading the oath of office of the new government. Are you worried about anything? I personally believe that this move shows that Prayut's supreme privilege "Linxian 44" is still there, and the Military Government Peacekeeping Committee is still there..." Note: "Article 44 of the provisional constitution", referred to as "Linxian 44", is the highest privilege for maintaining peace and suppressing everything during the Prayut military government period. Once this order is issued, no organization or individual has the right to oppose it. After reading this, many readers may wonder, Paisen is also a senior general in military uniform, and he served as the spokesperson of Vice Premier Pray during the military government, so he is naturally in the Prayut camp. Such a "mouth general" can bring up the "Shangfang Sword" of the previous dynasty "Linxian 44" when the new government took office. 3 Is this the aloofness of "not helping one's own people" or the wisdom of "having other profound meanings"? Moreover, the oath of the new government is incomplete. What is the relationship between this and the "Linxian 44" of the previous government? The answer is below. Final analysis - Political scholar Ansadang: If negative rumors cannot be stopped in time, they will definitely accumulate repeatedly. I hope the Prime Minister will think twice before OK! Political Scholar Ansadang
August 7, 2019, 19:32 Bangkok time, the famous Thai political Scholar Ansadang analyzed in an interview with a reporter from Thailand.com:
"The focus of the debate in this incident is: whether Prime Minister Prayut violates the Constitution and whether he has not completed the oath at the inauguration ceremony.After all, once an act of illegal constitution occurs, no matter how big or small, there should be corresponding sanctions, rather than differences due to the identity rights of the person who made the mistake. The "
" Constitution is the highest law in Thailand. Since there are legal provisions, those who violate the truth must have corresponding execution capabilities. Otherwise, if others violate the Constitution in the future, they can also take the Prime Minister as an example and choose to downplay or slight downward. In this way, where is the majesty of the Constitution? "
Political Scholar Ansa Dang
" After the election, Prime Minister Prayut's biggest change was the reduction of rights. Shortly after the Yingluck government collapsed, Prayut revised the Constitution, unified the military and police system of the whole Thailand, and used the "Article 44 of the Provisional Constitution" to establish a military government to manage all affairs in the country. It can be said that ‘Rin 44’ is omnipotent. "
" After this election, Prayut became an ordinary cabinet prime minister under the democratic model, and the provisional constitution became a thing of the past. After Prayut lost the 'real 44', he would inevitably not have the same broad and highly compulsory power as a special period of that year. This is also the best time to oppose Prayut's party creating voices. "
" Then, the camp against Prayut intends to use the reason that the oath process is not complete, to question the legitimacy and validity of the government and turn it into an "invalid government", which is actually a very risky behavior. "
" On August 6, Mr. Paisen, the former spokesperson of Vice Premier Ba Yi, mentioned in an interview that the 'Linxian44' still exists, but in fact it is not "demolition of our own people's Taiwan", which aroused the public's disgust. It is obvious that the real meaning of this lies in intimidation and warning the opposition - forgive others if you have to! Don't hang on! "
" Because even if Prayut's current new government was judged as an "invalid government" by the Constitutional Court for its 'oby oath' and the opposition achieved the purpose of preventing Prayut from governing, then under the state of anarchy, according to the constitutional provisions, Thailand's political arena will be temporarily replaced by Prayut's previous provisional military government. "Political scholar Ansadang said.
" The result can be imagined. The opposition's doubts are just promoting the return of the Prayut Military Government Peacekeeping Committee and promoting the return of Article 44 of the Provisional Constitution. But if it really reaches that point, Prayut will make a concerted effort to pick up the "Linxian 44" again and flatten all the opposition. "
" Next, let me talk about the incident in which Prayut did not finish reading the oath. Prayuth did respond afterwards, but this response was not at all responsible..."
" has been explaining why he had acted, and even mentioned that he had sworn all important contents, covering all the key points. However, he did not apologize for the consequences of the behavior, nor did he take practical actions to deal with the public's suspicion. "
" In short, Prayut refused to talk about his right or wrong in the 'som notes' incident. After all, once the definition of right or wrong is involved, it comes at a price. "
" If Prayut is really wrong, the consequences will naturally be contrary to the Constitution. The new government has been declared an "invalid government", but the efforts to overcome obstacles along the way of the election will be wasted, which is something Prayut doesn't want to see. What's more, if Thailand's political arena returns to the military government, if political sovereignty faces turbulent choices, I believe most people are unwilling to see it, and they are even more unwilling to experience it again..."
" But from the perspective of the people, just let it go? ! Of course, it doesn't work either. A very simple example is that there are rules in football, and everyone abide by them before the game can be carried out. Otherwise, if each person is matched with a ball and everyone plays their own games on the court, why bother to make a binding clause? Then what else can we talk about the dignity of the civilized era? "
" The effectiveness of the Constitution is the same in all countries, and the focus is on rigorous implementation and equality and majesty. The details of Prayut’s inauguration ceremony at the new government have now become a dispute over the government’s qualification judgment. I just hope that the authorities can have practical response measures and not delay them any more. The issue of avoidance is like a time bomb. When encountering similar cases in the future, it will be blown up at a glance. "
Political scholar Ansa Dang
" May the Prime Minister think twice before acting. If negative rumors cannot be stopped in time, they will definitely accumulate repeatedly.Most importantly, in the current constitution, poor handling will be recorded in history. As Thais, we don’t want to hear outsiders laughing and slandering - it turns out that Thailand’s oath of office is like a joke, saying whatever you want, and saying a few less words..." said political scholar Ansadang.
"In short, everything depends on Prayut's attitude, the Prime Minister's apology and proactive admission of right and wrong can all reduce the unreasonable suspicion from the outside world. "
Ansa Dang finally added: "Of course, our current analysis can only be based on the current situation, and all conclusions can only be determined by the Thai Constitutional Court. We also believe that the independent national supervisory department in Thailand's political arena will definitely give us a satisfactory reply after the investigation. "
Buzhou Demonstration at the end:
Compared with other countries, Thailand's parliamentary constitutional monarchy, It also has its own particularity and adaptability.
Since the revolution in the summer of 1932, Thailand has transformed from monarchy to parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The state's governance power has been transformed from one person in the early years to the elected government and cooperating with the governance of the elected government.
The king under the constitutional system maintains a neutrality that is not interfering. He is still the leader of the country, the commander of military power, and the head of the authority of Buddhism and the guardian of the territory.
In the face of major laws, the king has the right to issue and approve the decree, to study good criminals and amnesty the world, to replenish supplies in natural disasters, and to benefit all the people.
There is also a flow The most widely spread is the 19 turbulent coups that have been pacified for more than 70 years in the reign of the ninth kings, which have played an important role in national stability.
This is Thailand, and the constitution is with the king.
The oath ceremony in the article depicts the Kingdom of Thailand that has been going all the way from ancient times to the present.
At present, we cannot empathize with the step from the military government to the democratic model, nor do we have the right to intervene in weighing and make suggestions.
I hope you can also take the glory of the past, and
will remain bright in the coming days.
Text: Bu Zhou/Thailand.com
After reading the title of this article, I believe many readers have understood -
Prayut , this time it is really a big deal...
Indeed, the end of the Thai general election marks the arrival of the "new government" era.
However, the "new government" is new, all cabinet members are replaced and reshuffled, while Prime Minister Prayut is still Prime Minister Prayut. The "new" here can only mean that the temporary military government no longer exists and the democratic model returns to politics.
During this period, from the public's questioning the election results to the debate in the House of Congress, the opposition party's tit-for-tat-tat-the progress of the Prayut camp seemed to be accompanied by endless verbal battles, and was in a dilemma.
Recently, the Prayutian government has once again become the focus of hot discussions across Thailand. Unlike the previous "verb wars", the two major keywords of this incident have risen to [Tenth Kings] and [Constitution].
At the same time, some Thai people began to question: "If Prayut handles this matter improperly, can the government under its leadership be said to be equivalent to invalid?"
The "this matter" mentioned by the people will start from July 16, 2019.
On the same day, Prayut led the new government cabinet members to the election, wore dresses, based on the highest etiquette in Thailand, and in accordance with the Thai Constitution, they were sworn in under the witness of His Majesty Maha Vajiralongkorn, the 10th King of the Bangkok Dynasty, and His Highness Suthida. The background of this scene is actually easy to understand -
Thailand's former Chairman of the Privy Council (Regent, late) General Bing Tingsula Nuan once interpreted the relationship between king and politics: "A government is managed and supervised by soldiers and cabinet politicians, but the real master should be the supreme and noble King His Majesty."
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 Therefore, the oath-taking ceremony is crucial to the new government. The main content of the oath of
is mainly based on "I am willing to represent this government (swear)". It openly declares and promises one by one, including tribute to the king's royal family, loyalty and duty, protecting the country, and fighting for the people.
Then, the oath ceremony was carried out in an orderly manner, but the final result was as stated in the title of this article:
"In front of the 10th King of Thailand, Prayut's inauguration oath was not finished"
and it is not only as simple as "not finished reading".
"Prayuth's oath of office is related to the king and the constitutional provisions, but not only did he not read the original text of the oath of office, he also privately added and tampered with the content of the oath."
"This is a blatant violation of the Supreme Democratic Constitution. We will request the Constitutional Court to intervene and report the matter to the national supervisory department at the same time." Mr. Xi Suwan, secretary of the Constitutional Maintenance Organization of Thailand (4th of the left below), said in an interview on August 5.
Obviously, "Offering Oath" is an important part clearly stipulated in the Constitution of Thailand. It is a necessary procedure for the establishment of a new government. It represents that the old government has become history and the new leadership members take office.
Article 161 of the Constitution of Thailand also clearly states that the Prime Minister should complete the inauguration ceremony under the witness of the king.
So, what consequences will occur after Prayut fail to read the oath?
Prayut responded: "Don't care about these details! Don't make things big! I really didn't mean it!"
Soon, the news that Prayut had not completely swore to the king of the tenth generation spread throughout Thailand. The keyword tag of
#Offering the oath# (ถวายสัตย์ปฏิญาณไม่ครบถ้วน) also occupies major online media platforms, and there are constant speculations from all walks of life -
"What does it mean? Illegal constitution? So blatant?"
"If you don't finish taking the oath, you mean that you are unwilling to accept the new constitution, and then the new government is not qualified to take office."
" If you are sworn in after the constitutional procedure is completed, this government will be invalid..."
" Please respond! Your Excellency the Prime Minister, otherwise we will doubt when? ! "
under public opinion, Prime Minister Prayut still responded.
response is divided into two stages, two attitudes.
responds to the first stage: "Don't make things bigger! "
It is reported that the incident began to ferment on the evening of July 16, and Prayut never responded to it for July.
It was not until August 5 that Prayut officially talked about this matter in the face of the storm of questions from the political circles to the people:
"What I want to make clear is that my oath has covered all the key points and meanings that need to be expressed (ครอบคลุ��), everything is implemented in accordance with the royal etiquette process, everything I do is for the people, which is consistent with the original intention of the Constitution! "
"Don't care about the details, don't make this matter big, don't over-misunderstand it leads to turmoil in the country. If you pay too much attention to issues such as "good or bad", then just wait for the next election! ”
(อย่าให้การเมืองทำประเทศชาติปั่นวน ถ้าจะดีหรือไ่ม่ดีอย่างไร ก็ไปรอเลือกตั้งคราวหน้าแล้วกัน...... )
Prayut responded to the second phase: I did not intentionally!
On August 7, 2019, Bangkok local time at 13:00, Prayut talked about this matter again during his inspection in Tainan Yera Province and made a brief response:
"I did not intentionally, I did not intentionally, we should pay attention to the motivation and consciousness of the behavior itself (เจตนา), right? "
From the attitude of the two stages, it is not difficult to find that in the "swearing is not completed" incident, Prime Minister Prayut is more of a "explanation" to respond to the cause of the incident, or to guide the public to view the matter.
It is worth noting that there is no apology or judgment on the nature of the behavior.
But for Thai media and scholars who are paying attention to this matter, they hope that the authorities can make a clear "right and wrong" decision on this matter and bear the corresponding consequences.
escape will only increase the public's dissatisfaction and may make the incident more complicated.
Bay former spokesperson Paisen: Prayut's move shows that the highest privilege "Linxian 44" is still there, and the military government peacekeeping committee is still there...
August 6, 2019, Mr. Paisen, former spokesperson of Thailand's Deputy Prime Minister Paisen said in an interview: "Prayut has not finished reading the oath of office of the new government. Are you worried about anything? I personally believe that this move shows that Prayut's supreme privilege "Linxian 44" is still there, and the Military Government Peacekeeping Committee is still there..."
Note: "Article 44 of the provisional constitution", referred to as "Linxian 44", is the highest privilege for maintaining peace and suppressing everything during the Prayut military government period. Once this order is issued, no organization or individual has the right to oppose it.
After reading this, many readers may wonder,
Paisen is also a senior general in military uniform, and he served as the spokesperson of Vice Premier Pray during the military government, so he is naturally in the Prayut camp.
Such a "mouth general" can bring up the "Shangfang Sword" of the previous dynasty "Linxian 44" when the new government took office. 3
Is this the aloofness of "not helping one's own people" or the wisdom of "having other profound meanings"?
Moreover, the oath of the new government is incomplete. What is the relationship between this and the "Linxian 44" of the previous government?
The answer is below.
Final analysis - Political scholar Ansadang: If negative rumors cannot be stopped in time, they will definitely accumulate repeatedly. I hope the Prime Minister will think twice before OK!
Political Scholar Ansadang
August 7, 2019, 19:32 Bangkok time, the famous Thai political Scholar Ansadang analyzed in an interview with a reporter from Thailand.com:
"The focus of the debate in this incident is: whether Prime Minister Prayut violates the Constitution and whether he has not completed the oath at the inauguration ceremony.After all, once an act of illegal constitution occurs, no matter how big or small, there should be corresponding sanctions, rather than differences due to the identity rights of the person who made the mistake. The "
" Constitution is the highest law in Thailand. Since there are legal provisions, those who violate the truth must have corresponding execution capabilities. Otherwise, if others violate the Constitution in the future, they can also take the Prime Minister as an example and choose to downplay or slight downward. In this way, where is the majesty of the Constitution? "
Political Scholar Ansa Dang
" After the election, Prime Minister Prayut's biggest change was the reduction of rights. Shortly after the Yingluck government collapsed, Prayut revised the Constitution, unified the military and police system of the whole Thailand, and used the "Article 44 of the Provisional Constitution" to establish a military government to manage all affairs in the country. It can be said that ‘Rin 44’ is omnipotent. "
" After this election, Prayut became an ordinary cabinet prime minister under the democratic model, and the provisional constitution became a thing of the past. After Prayut lost the 'real 44', he would inevitably not have the same broad and highly compulsory power as a special period of that year. This is also the best time to oppose Prayut's party creating voices. "
" Then, the camp against Prayut intends to use the reason that the oath process is not complete, to question the legitimacy and validity of the government and turn it into an "invalid government", which is actually a very risky behavior. "
" On August 6, Mr. Paisen, the former spokesperson of Vice Premier Ba Yi, mentioned in an interview that the 'Linxian44' still exists, but in fact it is not "demolition of our own people's Taiwan", which aroused the public's disgust. It is obvious that the real meaning of this lies in intimidation and warning the opposition - forgive others if you have to! Don't hang on! "
" Because even if Prayut's current new government was judged as an "invalid government" by the Constitutional Court for its 'oby oath' and the opposition achieved the purpose of preventing Prayut from governing, then under the state of anarchy, according to the constitutional provisions, Thailand's political arena will be temporarily replaced by Prayut's previous provisional military government. "Political scholar Ansadang said.
" The result can be imagined. The opposition's doubts are just promoting the return of the Prayut Military Government Peacekeeping Committee and promoting the return of Article 44 of the Provisional Constitution. But if it really reaches that point, Prayut will make a concerted effort to pick up the "Linxian 44" again and flatten all the opposition. "
" Next, let me talk about the incident in which Prayut did not finish reading the oath. Prayuth did respond afterwards, but this response was not at all responsible..."
" has been explaining why he had acted, and even mentioned that he had sworn all important contents, covering all the key points. However, he did not apologize for the consequences of the behavior, nor did he take practical actions to deal with the public's suspicion. "
" In short, Prayut refused to talk about his right or wrong in the 'som notes' incident. After all, once the definition of right or wrong is involved, it comes at a price. "
" If Prayut is really wrong, the consequences will naturally be contrary to the Constitution. The new government has been declared an "invalid government", but the efforts to overcome obstacles along the way of the election will be wasted, which is something Prayut doesn't want to see. What's more, if Thailand's political arena returns to the military government, if political sovereignty faces turbulent choices, I believe most people are unwilling to see it, and they are even more unwilling to experience it again..."
" But from the perspective of the people, just let it go? ! Of course, it doesn't work either. A very simple example is that there are rules in football, and everyone abide by them before the game can be carried out. Otherwise, if each person is matched with a ball and everyone plays their own games on the court, why bother to make a binding clause? Then what else can we talk about the dignity of the civilized era? "
" The effectiveness of the Constitution is the same in all countries, and the focus is on rigorous implementation and equality and majesty. The details of Prayut’s inauguration ceremony at the new government have now become a dispute over the government’s qualification judgment. I just hope that the authorities can have practical response measures and not delay them any more. The issue of avoidance is like a time bomb. When encountering similar cases in the future, it will be blown up at a glance. "
Political scholar Ansa Dang
" May the Prime Minister think twice before acting. If negative rumors cannot be stopped in time, they will definitely accumulate repeatedly.Most importantly, in the current constitution, poor handling will be recorded in history. As Thais, we don’t want to hear outsiders laughing and slandering - it turns out that Thailand’s oath of office is like a joke, saying whatever you want, and saying a few less words..." said political scholar Ansadang.
"In short, everything depends on Prayut's attitude, the Prime Minister's apology and proactive admission of right and wrong can all reduce the unreasonable suspicion from the outside world. "
Ansa Dang finally added: "Of course, our current analysis can only be based on the current situation, and all conclusions can only be determined by the Thai Constitutional Court. We also believe that the independent national supervisory department in Thailand's political arena will definitely give us a satisfactory reply after the investigation. "
Buzhou Demonstration at the end:
Compared with other countries, Thailand's parliamentary constitutional monarchy, It also has its own particularity and adaptability.
Since the revolution in the summer of 1932, Thailand has transformed from monarchy to parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The state's governance power has been transformed from one person in the early years to the elected government and cooperating with the governance of the elected government.
The king under the constitutional system maintains a neutrality that is not interfering. He is still the leader of the country, the commander of military power, and the head of the authority of Buddhism and the guardian of the territory.
In the face of major laws, the king has the right to issue and approve the decree, to study good criminals and amnesty the world, to replenish supplies in natural disasters, and to benefit all the people.
There is also a flow The most widely spread is the 19 turbulent coups that have been pacified for more than 70 years in the reign of the ninth kings, which have played an important role in national stability.
This is Thailand, and the constitution is with the king.
The oath ceremony in the article depicts the Kingdom of Thailand that has been going all the way from ancient times to the present.
At present, we cannot empathize with the step from the military government to the democratic model, nor do we have the right to intervene in weighing and make suggestions.
I hope you can also take the glory of the past, and
will remain bright in the coming days.
Text: Bu Zhou/Thailand.com
Most importantly, in the current constitution, poor handling will be recorded in history. As Thais, we don’t want to hear outsiders laughing and slandering - it turns out that Thailand’s oath of office is like a joke, saying whatever you want, and saying a few less words..." said political scholar Ansadang."In short, everything depends on Prayut's attitude, the Prime Minister's apology and proactive admission of right and wrong can all reduce the unreasonable suspicion from the outside world. "
Ansa Dang finally added: "Of course, our current analysis can only be based on the current situation, and all conclusions can only be determined by the Thai Constitutional Court. We also believe that the independent national supervisory department in Thailand's political arena will definitely give us a satisfactory reply after the investigation. "
Buzhou Demonstration at the end:
Compared with other countries, Thailand's parliamentary constitutional monarchy, It also has its own particularity and adaptability.
Since the revolution in the summer of 1932, Thailand has transformed from monarchy to parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The state's governance power has been transformed from one person in the early years to the elected government and cooperating with the governance of the elected government.
The king under the constitutional system maintains a neutrality that is not interfering. He is still the leader of the country, the commander of military power, and the head of the authority of Buddhism and the guardian of the territory.
In the face of major laws, the king has the right to issue and approve the decree, to study good criminals and amnesty the world, to replenish supplies in natural disasters, and to benefit all the people.
There is also a flow The most widely spread is the 19 turbulent coups that have been pacified for more than 70 years in the reign of the ninth kings, which have played an important role in national stability.
This is Thailand, and the constitution is with the king.
The oath ceremony in the article depicts the Kingdom of Thailand that has been going all the way from ancient times to the present.
At present, we cannot empathize with the step from the military government to the democratic model, nor do we have the right to intervene in weighing and make suggestions.
I hope you can also take the glory of the past, and
will remain bright in the coming days.
Text: Bu Zhou/Thailand.com
