When the legislative body of the Taiwan authorities was questioned yesterday (4th), Zeng Mingzong, the general convened the Kuomintang caucus, questioned the policy publicity expenses of the "Committee on Agriculture" from January to August this year to evade the "Government Procurement Law" by breaking the whole into pieces. It is suspected that specific media such as "Three Lis" and "People's Visual" were criticized by "Chairman of the Committee of Agriculture" Chen Jizhong, "You are so bold!"
Zeng Mingzong questioned the general budget yesterday, questioning the DPP authorities' listing propaganda expenses to support specific media, and named Chen Jizhong to spend money randomly. The "General Office of the Mainland Affairs Office" had the "most headache" for Chen Jizhong, and asked whether the advertising and marketing expenses of the "Committee on Agriculture" were "published in accordance with the law this year (NT$150 million, the same below)? Chen Jizhong declared, "Of course, all of them are."
Zeng Mingzong pointed out that the "Committee on Agriculture" policy publicity cost from January to August this year, of which 4.93 million yuan was "Kailo Media" was 9%, 10.61 million yuan, accounting for 20%, and 10.33 million yuan, accounting for 19%. Is it "legal" for expenditure? Chen Jizhong responded, "The relevant bidding is handled according to the regulations, and information can be provided after the meeting."
Zeng Mingzong said that he checked these materials one by one, "there is absolutely no misunderstanding". He is willing to bet on with Chen Jizhong . If there is no misunderstanding, will Chen Jizhong step down? These are logically required to be publicly tendered. There are 69 transactions in "Minshi" with a total of 149,733 yuan per transaction, and 1,123 transactions in "Sanli" and 86,303 yuan per transaction. There are so many transactions, and there is no need to publicly tendered for each transaction of about 100,000 yuan? "Chen Jizhong, are you too brave? Did you explain?"
Chen Jizhong argued that it is impossible to break the whole into pieces. The bidding is all at once, how can it be done in batches one by one. The Taiwan Strait retorted, "If I had profit, welcome to sue." He could stand all the tests. If there was any political intervention, "I would have been shot and killed long ago, how could I still stand here."
Zeng Mingzong quoted Article 14 of the "Government Procurement Law" "The agency shall not intend to evade the application of this law and handle procurements above the announced amount in batches." He emphasized "Why are the "three realities" and "civil vision" particularly good? Who explained it?" and questioned whether it involves profit-making? If so, I plan to go to the District Prosecutor's Office to file a lawsuit. (Lin Jingxian/Editor)
