In the early stages of the epidemic in 2020, the UK was the first to propose " herd immunity ", but it was scolded by international public opinion, including British and American scientists. At that time, some Chinese media believed that the UK's "herd immunity theory" was correct and a "more advanced humanitarian ". Of course, it also encountered criticism and rejection from domestic public opinion.
However, things always change, and the direction of public opinion changes faster. The epidemic has entered its third year. If we only look at online public opinion, it seems that the number of people who support "letting down and letting go" has already gained the upper hand. "What epidemic prevention policies should China adopt?" Some big Vs can gain a large amount of traffic from supporters by just hinting at "lying to relax" and public opinion seems to have turned around.

Zhengzhou Foxconn has an epidemic, and employees have fled. The views of "dynamic clearance" vs. "Lying flat and relaxing the school" have once again faced each other's tit-for-tat.
"Dynamic Clearing Party" believes that once "live and let go", the escape behavior of Foxconn employees is a microcosm of the entire Chinese society in the face of the spread of the epidemic. After "lying flat and letting go", there will be people who are not afraid of the virus, and there will be people who are very afraid of the virus. After the epidemic spreads on a large scale, it will cause unimaginable impact on the hearts of the society. Those who flee will not even care about their jobs or salaries, and the economy will be much worse than when " dynamically clears ".
"Lying flat and relaxing" believes that those who escaped Foxconn believe in excessive "theory of the harm of the epidemic". The overall educational background of Foxconn employees is relatively low, but in fact, "the epidemic is not scary at all." If they always scare them, they will run away. If they don’t scare them, they will certainly not run away.

The two factions once again entered a situation where no one could convince anyone.
In my opinion, discussing "Why did Foxconn employees in Zhengzhou escape" may not prove who is right and who is wrong with the "dynamic clearance party" and the "live-official relaxation party". Because people's hearts are complicated, the case of Zhengzhou Foxconn may not explain the problem.
Someone said: "If it happens to others, then you will shout to coexist with lie down and happen to yourself. It must be cleared. It's just human nature." This sentence makes some sense.
Let me give you a real thing. A certain city is blocked from silence, and many people in a certain building in a certain community clamor to "live flat and let go" every day. While the entire community keeps the nucleic acid completely under the nucleic acid, they run to the community to chat and bask in the sun every day during silent period . However, one day, there were people in this building, and the people in the whole building went from "lying flat and letting go" to "strictly clearing". They even joined forces to force the old man who was paralyzed in bed to transfer to the hospital.
People's hearts are so complicated and self-contradictory.
The escape of employees in Zhengzhou Foxconn is related to the epidemic, but it reflects Foxconn itself. In my opinion, the escape of Foxconn employees in Zhengzhou is due to panic due to opaque information, and the other is because employees have better choices and have no confidence in Foxconn's epidemic prevention and management.
I have read several interview reports in the past two days, and the person who fled Foxconn said: "I chose to leave because people are panic, and I will leave if others leave." The left-behind person and Foxconn's management said: "No one left at first. Someone on a short video app spread rumors that "Foxconn is a lying test area" and someone left."
For me, when Foxconn employees see the Henan epidemic report with few new cases every day, compared with a large group of positive cases around them who are pulled out of quarantine every day, they will feel uneasy. Henan and even various media have not reported much after the outbreak of the epidemic in Foxconn, Zhengzhou for a long time. If we were Foxconn employees and saw someone on a short video app saying "Foxconn is a lying experimental zone", what would we think?
information is opaque, and the information you see is completely different from the information around you. It would be strange if the employees of Zhengzhou Foxconn do not feel panic.

In addition, there are many large manufacturing companies with more than 100,000 people and high-density concentration of personnel. Why did other companies not experience a large-scale epidemic? Why could other companies quickly control the epidemic after the epidemic, and there was no incident in which a large number of employees escaped?
A large number of employees of Zhengzhou Foxconn flee can only show that Foxconn itself has poor management capabilities and lacks cohesion in its company. Zhengzhou Foxconn is like a bulk. A large number of employees of Foxconn, Zhengzhou, fled because they had better choices. Going back to their hometowns and going to work in companies in other places would not affect their income and life.
There are few people in the Zhengzhou epidemic notification every day, and the media also reported that a large number of employees fled when the epidemic occurred in Zhengzhou Foxconn. We faced such contradictory information at the same time. Is this awesome?
To put it bluntly, the incident of employees of Zhengzhou Foxconn fleeing is an social incident . It was triggered by the epidemic and is far more harsh than a social incident that is ineffective in epidemic prevention. Foxconn itself has serious problems, and the media that has been silent about Foxconn's epidemic is serious. The local government that needs Foxconn to provide export data and economic data also has great problems in its supervision.
Escape from Foxconn, Zhengzhou employees are discussing the impact of epidemic prevention policies on the economy. This is also the focus of the debate between the "dynamic clearance faction" and the "live-official party".
Saying data may better explain the facts:

From the second half of 2021 to the present, there are only 21 countries with global trade surplus. The surplus of these 21 countries whose exports are greater than imports are summarized, and China accounts for 62.8% of the total; China, which implements "dynamic clearance", has an increasingly greater influence on the world economy of . The West, which is engaged in "live and relaxing", has not only not improved, but will also be subject to the economic downturn by the United States, which cannot bear the economic downturn, which has made the trade deficit of .
So, so, as of now, "dynamic clearance" and "live flat and relaxation" have a greater negative impact on the economy from a macro perspective.
All of us hope that because the virus has evolved more gently, because of the increase in medical resources, and because of other favorable factors, we can return to life like before the epidemic, which can have a significant boost to China's economic development. But as of now, all data and examples do not support the view of "letting down and relaxing".
For China, "letting go" now will cause little harm to individuals, especially young people, but due to the lack of medical resources and other reasons, it will cause great harm to the overall society. This is a contradiction that cannot be resolved at the moment.