I believe that many friends who live in the city are gradually paying more and more attention to air quality, especially those who have squinted eyes. However, the air purifiers on the market are not familiar enough to consumers and are easy to get into pitfalls. Today I made 4 air purifier purchase guides, pure dry goods that can be collected!
They are from Mijia, Philips, Sharp and Hong Kong, China respectively.
First of all, for the price, Mijia flagship air purification Pro costs 1579 yuan, Sharp KC-Z380SW1 costs 2399 yuan, Philips AC4976 costs 2099 yuan, and b-MOLA costs 2999 yuan.
Of course, price is quite important, but the effect of the air purifier is the most important.
Among these four air cleaners, we can find that only Mijia air cleaners cannot remove PM2.5 and formaldehyde, although its price is the cheapest. However, as a person with rhinitis sensitive, you can choose some air cleansing that can remove harmful substances.
There are three models left in the air-purpose brand. As old air-purpose brands, Sharp and Philips, their prices are similar, but the effects are completely different.
They use two different traditional purification techniques: PCI ion groups and activated carbon molecules. As traditional air purification technologies, they can remove harmful substances such as PM2.5 and formaldehyde from the air. However, Philips' air cleaning technology does not have the function of decomposing formaldehyde, it can only perform adsorption, and if the filter element is not replaced in time, it will cause secondary pollution in the air.
So people who don’t have enough time should be cautious about buying this air purifier.
Finally, we use the second expensive Sharp and the most expensive b-MOLA to compare.
We can see that although they are 600 yuan apart, b-MOLA's air purifier uses completely different technologies.
b-MOLA air purifier uses our unusual NCCO air purification technology, which is developed by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and is used in large institutions and hospitals all year round. Moreover, this technology can adsorb and decompose bacteria, dust and various harmful pollutants in the air.
Although they can all decompose harmless carbon dioxide and water after air purification, they are the first step in the NCCO air purification technology. The oxygen polymerization reaction layer of NCCO can be recycled and completely purified without easily losing material. In the tests of professional institutions, this filter element, which costs 188, can last up to 12 years.
And we also read research from British Columbia (UBC) in Canada that NCCO air purification technology is better than traditional sterilization ions and active molecules, and has stronger air purification capabilities. Therefore, we can conclude that in the same home environment, the b-MOLA air purifier has the strongest and best purification capabilities.
I also used it in the same room in Beijing for four days to test it. Every day after the test, I open the window to ensure the fairness of the evaluation data. Indeed, we did not feel discomfort in the nose in the room after using the b-MOLA air purifier.
Based on my test and comparison, I think the b-MOLA air purifier has the highest cost-effectiveness. After all, everyone wants to solve the most problems with the same price. In the 2,000 yuan level, I think if you are interested, you can take the opportunity to make a move in a certain east.
