Russian Defense Ministry condemned Ukraine's inhumane behavior and accused Ukraine of attempting to carry out attacks on Russia's mainland, planning "terrorist attacks" within Russia, etc. Regarding the Russian accusations, the Ukrainian General Staff quickly stood up and denied that the Ukrainian army did not bomb the prisoner-of-war camp, and the attack may have been done by the Russian army. Ukraine said that the Russian army's "absurd" in Ukraine has been more than a day or two. Russia's accusations against Ukraine are purely lies and are also provocations against Ukraine.
("Haimas" multi-tube rocket system)
Both sides have their own opinions, and the truth cannot be verified. Obviously, it is another " Rashomon ". Analysts believe that for such events, usually starting from the results may be closer to the truth. So let’s think about a question: Who is the death of the prisoners in the Azov camp in , which is more beneficial to ?
You should know that the reason why the Russian side imprisoned the prisoners of Azov Camp in this prison was not to "take them in one pot" and eliminate them directly. Otherwise, the Russian army could do this on the battlefield, and there was no need to worry about detention and interrogation. Obviously, the Russian side intends to expose their crimes through legal means and then give them the corresponding trial in court.
During the interrogation, the Russian side not only had the opportunity to obtain more relevant information on the battlefield, but also possible to obtain evidence of some Ukrainian troops' "Nazi" behavior. Once all these evidences are made public, the "Ukrainian perfect victim theory" advocated by the West may be self-defeating, and more people will pay attention to the performance of the Unana elements in the war, and Russia will have the opportunity to win a game back in the public opinion field.
In fact, the Russian side has already done this. As early as last month, the Donetsk armed forces sentenced three mercenaries in Ukraine to death. These three people were from the UK and Monaco respectively. Before sentenced, all three had pleaded guilty in court, admitting that they had participated in crimes such as "promoting terrorism training and activities". In the face of testimony, the Russian verdict seemed reasonable. Although the UK protested, as the date of execution of the firing approached, I am afraid that all three people would be doomed.
Russia captured prisoners in order to obtain more intelligence and evidence. Now that the attack has led to a large number of prisoners killed. Russia's plan encountered obstacles and was still full of infamous. Such a result is obviously unfavorable to Russia. So, could be the Ukrainian army deliberately planned this attack in order to prevent the Russian army from obtaining intelligence and evidence, killing a large number of "own people" to achieve the goal of "killing and silence" ?
Some people believe that the possibility of the Ukrainian army doing this cannot be ruled out. After all, there have been precedents in the fact that the Ukrainian army opened fire on its own people. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, in the middle of last month, a team of Ukrainian troops on the battlefield decided to put down their weapons and surrender. However, just as they raised their hands and moved towards the Russian position, a Ukrainian armored vehicle unit that arrived at the scene suddenly shot at them from behind, resulting in the death of 32 Ukrainian troops. Russian Ministry of Defense spokesman Konashenkov accused Ukrainian side of the Ukrainian side that did not cherish the lives of its own soldiers.
What's more, this time, the Russian side clearly pointed out that Ukraine used " Himas " to launch an attack in the early morning. The time, location and even the model of weapons are very clear. Ukraine just denies it, and I am afraid that it is slightly inferior to Russia in terms of persuasion.
