Seeing that Lee Dan and Na Ying did not shoot lights for Kid in the fourth episode of the fifth and talk show, Kid was eliminated. Most of the audience in the barrage were in the same mood, and they felt that Lee Dan was so brightly recommended to the real dog.
But calm down and think about it, doing so is actually a win-win situation for Kid, the talk show conference program, the veteran talk show actor represented by Cheng Lusiwen, the former couple, and the Xiaoguo Culture company.
Yes, this farce questioned for "unfairness" and "shady curtain", based on actual interests, is the most hurtful person, but just the audience's feelings that still have some idealistic fantasies about this show.
Before starting my discussion, let me explain why Li Dan was "bright" in the booking. Because at least from the perspective of handling many details, it is obvious that it can be done more obscurely, but it deliberately sells a flaw, which is really intriguing.
First of all, from the perspective of program effects, Kid's performance this time is undoubtedly very outstanding, which is also the premise that the controversy can be established. His text and performance were completed very well, with funny points and opinions, and he outputted many golden sentences such as "I have to be a father to my child and a mother to my husband" and "My mother is not only a mother, but also a self-centered person". The audience was also very reunited and the atmosphere was very good.
(Compared with the other one, Liang Haiyuan, who is also "unfair" by everyone - he is also an actor I like very much. He has the same strong text, but it is indeed a little worse in performance, and the atmosphere on the scene is also a bit worse than that of Kid, so let's not talk about it here for now.)
looks at the final votes, Kid won 170 votes, Cheng Lu 175 votes, and the two people have a 5 votes apart. Some people say that even if you add 4 votes, Kid is not as tall as Cheng Lu.
You should know that the role of "joking" is to lead and stimulate the audience below to vote. Think about it, when the contestant got 4 lights, wouldn’t the audience below burst into a sensation? Therefore, we have reason to believe that if Kid was 4 lamps at that time, the total number of votes in the end would be very likely to be higher than Cheng Lu, and thus advance smoothly.
Once the "recommended" setting is established, let's look at the gap between these 5 votes, which is a bit subtle, because it can clearly stretch the gap even more, making Cheng Lu more destined to win - but this will make the audience in front of the screen point the finger at the audience who voted on the spot that day, believing that it was the mistake of the audience on the spot, which dispersed the firepower and prevented the traffic from focusing on the program itself.
seems to be a flaw, but it is actually a prediction. high.
The second flaw is that when Li Dan commented on Kid's performance, he said "accidentally", "Your paragraph is very explosive." The word "very explosive" is almost the highest evaluation in the talk show program. It means that the meme is made, the scene effect is very good, the audience resonates with each other, etc. Li Dan refused to shoot the lights, but said "very explosive", which shows that he recognized Kid's performance in his heart. Although Li Dan quickly realized that his words and deeds were different, he changed the subject.
and Da Zhangwei also contributed the classic complaint "Why are you so much trouble?"
You should know that the programs are edited, and these two sentences can not appear at all. But since it appears, it has its intention.
After Da Zhangwei said this, the barrage of "Da Zhangwei is my Internet speaker" floated over, indicating that the program team had long anticipated the audience's reaction. This sentence is put here to further arouse the audience's emotions.
is right, this is another prediction and also a purposeful guidance for the audience's emotions.
There is another noteworthy detail here, that is, during the entire process of Kid, Na Ying was almost "invisible". Except for a telephoto that showed that she and Li Dan did not take the light, Na Ying was almost impossible to see throughout the whole process, and there was only a flash of time.
So, after analyzing this is a premeditated "recommended" situation, why do I say that Li Dan is "right" to do this?
Sure enough, after the show was broadcast, Li Dan, Siwen Chenglu and Kid all became hot searches.
The top three people should be accustomed to being on the hot searches, but for Kid, he is almost an amateur, it should be his first time on the hot searches, and his image is very positive - "a contestant who dedicated a wonderful performance but was eliminated due to unfair competitions" - both of which recognize his professional ability and also gain the sympathy of the audience. These two together make a pair of kings.
Kid himself also said on the show that he chose Siwen Chenglu's group in order to gain more attention.
This is a dangerous move. Whenever his performance that day was a little disappointing, he would become the cannon fodder for the program team to hype CPs, and no one would remember him. But he performed well, and although he lost the game, he became the biggest winner.
In my analysis, Kid was never included in the program team's "script". Although his manuscript actually told jokes about his parents' divorce and suspected reunion, it seems to be of a deep meaning in this group. But I didn't think about it in this direction. It was out of selfishness that I wanted to maintain the story of this young actor "lost the east corner and gain the worst corner".
At the same time, I also understand very well why other talk show actors on the scene reacted so much to Haiyuan's departure.
(After Haiyuan was eliminated, the actors stood up to pay tribute.)
Because Haiyuan is the only contestant in this group who has not been popular with the topic of divorce (I said a few words at the beginning, but generally speaking, the talk show actors will call back the content of the previous actor as soon as they come up, which is not counted), even if they lose, they will lose openly (of course, there is another reason because Haiyuan is Xiaoguo's old man after all, and he said that he will not participate in the talk show conference in the future, so it is more reasonable and safe to "cry" him).
Let’s talk about the statement that Li Dan is recommended to an old contestant who has been criticized by some netizens. If Xiaoguo does not sign a contract, it is impossible to advance. My personal opinion is that Xiaoguo is a commercial company after all. Li Dan also said that Xiaoguo is a "dominate but weak" company in the talk show industry. It needs to use this method to let other "out-of-staff" actors who are still watching clearly see what you can get when joining Xiaoguo; if you don’t join, you will lose. Only in this way can it constantly attract the participation of all kinds of great gods (although mainly Shan Liren) such as Zhou Qimo, Xiaolu, Tong Monan and Xu Zhisheng.
talk show can be sharp, profound, advanced, satirical, and analysed the essence, but as an actor, what you can't escape is to have to eat, live, and fame, fortune and fortune.
So you can see that Li Dan, who is increasingly "businessman rationality", adheres to the concept of "program first", and seems to have long deviated from the original intention of a talk show actor. And other veteran players are also half-supporting and half-stop cooperating with this game to be played. They are just using the loss of their once extremely trustworthy exchange for what they can really have.
The show must go on.
life is the same.
to the end, this is just a game for each to get the adults they need. And grand propositions such as "fairness" do not seem to be the main responsibility that a variety show should bear in the current context.
Finally, the article ends with a sentence quoted by Dr. Cao, hoping that the talk show (or comedy) can continue to make "the powerless person is powerful, and the pessimist move forward."
Maybe, this is enough, and it will never be enough.
