Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen recently accepted an exclusive interview with the Washington Post [Global Network Comprehensive Report] Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen recently accepted an exclusive interview with the Washington Post, saying that she would not accept the "acceptance of the

Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen recently accepted an exclusive interview with the Washington Post

[Global Network Comprehensive Report] Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen recently accepted an exclusive interview with the Washington Post, saying that she would not accept the "acceptance of the 1992 Consensus within a time limit", which was widely interpreted by many media as a substantial rejection of the "1992 Consensus". In response, former Taiwan Leadership Office spokesman Luo Zhiqiang wrote an article in Taiwan's China Times on the 25th, pointing out whether Tsai Ing-wen rejected the "1992 Consensus" and it is just a word game. The real situation is that the "1992 Consensus" has been essentially announced to be "suspended" by Tsai Ing-wen.

What impact will the "stop work" decision have on Taiwan and Tsai Ing-wen himself? Luo Zhiqiang analyzed that Tsai Ing-wen might as well take a look at the "dome suspension crisis" fabricated by Ko Wen-je and himself, and you can get some insights.

Luo Zhiqiang said in the article that the Taipei Municipal Government released a poll and Ke Wenzhe's satisfaction reached a new low, falling into a cross of death, with only 42.4% of satisfaction remaining, and the dissatisfaction climbed to 43.8%. Although the public polling agencies successively conducted cross-death polls a few months ago, and the death polls of Ke City Government's own city were half a beat slower, the first official poll of cross-death polls was indeed a major warning.

However, which one of the most critical factors is the reckless suspension of work of the "big dome", which not only laid a large bomb for Taipei City Workers, but also blew up Ke Wenzhe's originally mythical high polls.

Similarly, the "1992 Consensus suspension order" issued by Tsai Ing-wen is not only the "steel structure rust" on the surface of the cross-strait Peace Building, but more importantly, the rapid "floating of the base" security crisis has occurred. In terms of rhetoric, cross-strait mutual trust continues to deteriorate. The mainland not only began to increase the intensity of criticism of the Tsai administration verbally, but Tsai Ing-wen also seemed to have begun to "impatient", which is why the Washington Post responded dissatisfied with the "1992 Consensus" deadline. Based on this, Luo Zhiqiang pointed out that the "verbal restraint" maintained by the People's and the Communist Party in the past six months is disintegrating slightly accelerated.

Luo Zhiqiang also said that language confrontation is second, and the "encirclement" of the mainland on the policy, diplomatic and economic side is carried out more explicitly. These explicit actions lay out the "poverty Taiwan" strategy that Lin Zhongbin is worried about. There is no worst, only worse. Even Tsai Ing-wen's last trump card of "Alliance between the United States and China" became a "public plaque" in the illegal "South China Sea Arbitration Case". The US side mercilessly supported the so-called "South China Sea Arbitration" and downgraded Taiping Island to a "reef" and cut off the Taiwan authorities' claim rights of 200 nautical miles of exclusive economic waters.

However, what is frustrating is that all these can be foreseen from the moment Tsai Ing-wen issued a "stop order" for the "1992 Consensus", but Tsai Ing-wen made these pessimistic foresight come true one by one.

Tsai Ing-wen should not think that the public grievances and anger caused by this "stop work order" can be pushed to the "former dynasty" or to the mainland. Just like Ko Wen-je's plan was done, thinking that the "big dome" would stop working, the people would push their anger to the front, or pass on the far-fried hero. Taipei citizens may not like Far Evil, but they are also dissatisfied with Ko Wen-je’s recklessness; just as the Taiwanese people may be “resentful” about the mainland’s “strengthening encirclement”, but they will also clearly know that Tsai Ing-wen’s refusal to accept the “1992 Consensus” is the initiator and cannot be blamed.

What Taipei citizens want is safety, what Taiwan people want is peace, Ko Wen-je cannot give safety, polls enter the "death cross", Tsai Ing-wen cannot guarantee peace, Ko Wen-je's today is Tsai Ing-wen's tomorrow.