On National Day, many celebrities sent birthday wishes to their motherland, including many Taiwanese celebrity artists. This was a very normal thing, but some sharp-eyed netizens could see the difference between these celebrity artists sending blessings.
These netizens pointed out that among the many Taiwanese stars who sent blessings, only Yang Lijing , Jimmy Lin , Wu Yingjie , Wenqi and others mentioned the "motherland" in their blessings. Many others seem to be setting formulas and following the form.
For example, Rainie Yang just forwarded a message from CCTV News and wrote "Mountains and Rivers, Prosperous China, Happy Birthday to New China." The same Peng Yuyan also forwarded the news from CCTV News and wrote "Happy birthday, peace and prosperity, health and happiness."
You will find that there are many Taiwanese artists who publish articles in this form. So some netizens think that these artists’ posts are entirely for dealing with the situation and do not send blessings from the bottom of their hearts. Some people even say that the reason why these artists choose to post such articles is to protect themselves.
I feel that these netizens seem to have made a big deal, and there is no need to be petty about such things. For example, in the previous Xinjiang cotton incident, many celebrities used copywriting, and even pictures and punctuation marks were the same. Posting a post is just a form. It is enough to use this form to express one's attitude. There is really no need to quarrel with it.
If we look at the good things carefully, we will find that in addition to Taiwanese celebrities, many mainland and Hong Kong celebrities also use this set of copywriting to send blessings. For example, Zhang Xiaofei , which was very popular this year, also forwarded the news from CCTV News, with the caption "The mountains and rivers are beautiful, and the prosperous era is China, I wish you a happy birthday to the New China." Does it mean that there is no word "motherland" in her copywriting, so do you say that they are not patriotic? This seems to be a bit morally kidnapped !
In addition, many people are still arguing about whether Taiwanese artists should post articles during the National Day. Regarding this matter, netizens are basically divided into two factions, one faction supports and does not speak. They think whether they speak or not is their freedom. If they think that there is a problem with not speaking, then this is a moral kidnapping.
Some people say that they did not post on Moments during the National Day, nor did they change their avatar to national flag, but they were very patriotic. Patriotism is kept in mind, not spoken out.
There are even people who say that the people who speak are all for the purpose of developing in the mainland and making money in the mainland, so their speech is just a form of flattery, not from the heart.
In contrast, the other faction supports celebrities’ speeches. The reason is also very simple. They are public figures and should make a clear statement at critical moments.
has its own reasons, but one thing that is certain is that sending is better than not sending. The reason is that as a public figure, celebrities should set an example in good things.
Celebrities are different from ordinary people. If ordinary people post on Moments, there will not be many people who follow them. But a celebrity’s message will be seen by hundreds of thousands, millions, or tens of millions of fans, and will be forwarded to various places for more people to see it.
As a role model for fans, every move of celebrities is meaningful. In the eyes of ordinary people, it is just a casual shot, but in the eyes of fans, it is a light. They will follow the footsteps of celebrities, which is the appeal of public figures.
So as a star, you have an obligation and a responsibility. But we are immoral kidnapping. Anyway, it is the Internet era and the Internet has memories. We don’t remember many things, the Internet remembers them.
