The United States will fight Russia to the last Ukrainian !
The famous American magazine "American Conservatives" published an intriguing article on April 14, comprehensively analyzing the background of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, and focusing on interpreting the United States' continued actions to add fuel to the fire, mainly mentioning three major views.
First, the root cause of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis lies in NATO's eastward expansion . After the end of the Cold War, although Russia inherited the Soviet legacy, it was determined to return to the big family of Western society. At that time, it had even reached an agreement with the United States and European countries, hoping to join NATO . As the United States and other NATO countries deceived Russia, this result was ultimately led to such a result. After 1999, NATO continued to expand eastward, posing a huge threat to Russia. Russia believes that the United States violated its promise and then used a series of substantial actions of NATO's eastward expansion to attempt to kill Russia. In this case, it had to fight back, so it announced a special military operation in the Donbas area on February 24. The root cause of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis is certainly due to Russia's concerns about geostrategic security, but the deeper reason is that NATO's eastward expansion directly stimulates Russia's fragile and sensitive nerves. In fact, the United States is also the initiator of the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Second, after the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, the United States can actually propose more constructive plans to stop the Russian-Ukrainian crisis from escalating. The United States is fully capable of helping European countries reach a sustainable and effective security cooperation agreement with Russia, but the United States has not made any efforts to calm the situation, but has continued to add fuel to the fire in the Russian-Ukrainian crisis. The United States not only provides military aid and weapons and equipment to Ukraine, but also imposes various sanctions on Russia. A series of actions show that the United States hopes to use Ukraine to launch a proxy war and put Russia to death. The United States' add fuel to the fire not only encourages Ukraine, but also forces European countries to stand in the same camp as the United States. Since Russia launched a special military operation in Ukraine, it has fallen into a comprehensive dilemma in politics, diplomacy, economy, finance and other fields. This is due to the comprehensive sanctions imposed by the United States and other Western countries. The only strategic goal of all US actions is to completely drag down Russia.
Thirdly, Ukraine actually acts as cannon fodder between the two major forces in the East and the West. The United States uses Ukraine not to bring freedom and democracy, but because Ukraine happens to be a bridgehead for NATO member states such as the United States to curb Russia. Based on this consideration, Ukraine's position in the US global strategy is very important, and in the US's strategy to contain Russia, it is in an unprecedented critical position. From this perspective, the United States' strategy of containing Russia has not changed the current situation of Ukraine becoming cannon fodder, and Ukraine's status as a pawn cannot be changed. The fact that Russia launched a special military operation in Ukraine also shows that Russia will never give in on the Ukraine issue. Under the attack of the two major forces of the East and the West, it is obviously very difficult for Ukraine, which has weak national strength, to seek survival. If the Russian-Ukraine crisis continues, Ukraine will not only be unable to gain freedom and democracy, but will also face endless wars and poverty.
or above is the specific content of the relevant articles of "American Conservatives". It should be noted that the title of this article is very attractive, and it also accurately explains the article's views, namely "The United States and Russia will fight to the last Ukrainian." After understanding the basic content of the article, you can analyze it in detail.
First, this article shows a clear and calm attitude, which is very commendable. After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, Western society led by the United States immediately fell into a mad state of terror, expelling Russia, and hating Russia. In this fanatical atmosphere, some sober scholars and politicians still pointed out the historical roots of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis.American politicians Kissinger, Brzezinski, scholar Milsheimer and critic Chomsky both believe that although Russia's military operations violated Ukraine's national sovereignty, a careful analysis shows that the root cause of Russia's actions is that the United States and other NATO countries are betrayal to deceive Russia, causing them to fight back. Therefore, the biggest driving force behind the Russian-Ukrainian crisis is NATO's eastward expansion action. This sober and calm rational understanding of is a clear stream of fanaticism in the Western society led by the United States. The American Conservative magazine once again criticized and exposed the United States' actions on fire with a rational voice, which is worthy of praise. As China has repeatedly emphasized, looking at the Russian-Ukrainian crisis cannot be analyzed only from the surface, but also its complex historical motives should be noted.
Second, this article accurately explains the essence of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis in one sentence, but in fact it is still a special form of the game between great powers after the end of World War II, namely, agent war. The statement "The United States fought with Russia until the last Ukrainian" is too subtle, and it also reflects that the Russian-Ukrainian crisis is not only a problem between Russia and Ukraine, but also a problem between Russia and the United States. In order to maintain its hegemony and consolidate its strategic stability in the direction of Europe, the United States will inevitably engage in a long-term game with Russia. Based on the United States' strategic goal of comprehensively curbing and even dismembering Russia, this article reveals in one sentence that the Ukrainian issue is actually the outbreak of the conflict between the United States and Russia.
Although the game between the United States and Russia will continue, since both countries are nuclear powers and are permanent members of the UN Security Council, the two countries have formed a basic tacit understanding after the end of World War II, and the two sides will not engage in direct head-on confrontation. A careful observation can be found that since the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950, whether during the Cold War or after the end of the Cold War, as long as a major power enters a hot spot, other major powers will basically be behind the scenes and will not directly confront the major powers entering the hot spots. The Vietnam War, the First Gulf War, the Afghan War, and the Syrian War all follow this principle.
It can be seen that major powers generally avoid direct head-on confrontation, especially if both sides have the nuclear ability to destroy the world, and the same is true for this Russian-Ukrainian crisis. Precisely because the two major powers will not engage in direct head-on confrontation, in order to minimize the destructiveness brought by the war, agent war has become a necessary and special situation in the game of major powers. In this case, the most miserable fate is undoubtedly Ukraine as an agent tool. The article "American Conservatives" also clearly points out that in this Russian-Ukraine crisis, Ukraine will only become poorer. In fact, Ukraine has only two choices, one is to destruction, and the other is to have nothing. The so-called freedom, democracy, wealth and abundance are just short checks issued by the United States.
At the same time, it is also necessary to pay attention to the final two results of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis.
First, the struggle between the United States and Russia will continue. Only when the United States and Russia achieve their respective strategic goals will the Russian-Ukrainian crisis enter a moratorium. As for the current situation, the United States continues to add fuel to the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, which shows that its strategic goals have not been achieved. As a country with relatively rich natural resources, Russia still has enough ability to resist the threat when facing sanctions from the United States and other Western countries. Under such circumstances, the continued sanctions of the United States and its allies will not only not completely defeat Russia, but will instead face the situation of hurting the enemy by 1,000 and hurting themselves. The Russian-Ukraine crisis will naturally end in a more decent way, and the struggle between the two major powers of the United States and Russia at this stage has also been declared over.
Second, Ukraine's fate will eventually depend on the compromise reached in the continuous competition between the United States and Russia. This compromise has nothing to do with the self-interest of the Ukrainian people, but only depends on whether NATO represented by Russia and the United States can achieve a balance of power. Russia is unwilling to lose Ukraine as a barrier, and NATO cannot give up its plan to absorb Ukraine. In this case, Ukraine may calm down with a temporary ceasefire.Both of the above predictions show that Ukraine, which is in the confrontation between the two major forces in the East and the West, has no right to decide the fate of its own country at all. This is beyond doubt. Just as the title of the article "American Conservatives", the United States and Russia will fight to the last Ukrainian.
