"Global Times " latest report, on August 25, WHO announced that 1 million people died of COVID-19 in 2022, and said that this is a "tragic milestone" with all means to prevent death. Just the day before, the Brookings Institute, a well-known American think tank, released a report saying that there are currently about 16 million Americans aged 18 to 65 in the United States suffering from long-term sequelae of the new crown (referred to as "the new crown"), which has an impact that up to 4 million Americans working full-time cannot work, and the direct income loss may be as high as US$230 billion per year.
Kokhof's new crown epidemic Q&A Live Broadcast WHO Official Twitter Screenshot
These two sets of data once again tell us that China insists on " dynamically clearing " and is a successful person in the fight against the epidemic worldwide. But the closer it is to success, the more likely it is to have attribution divergence. Many experts say that vaccines reduce severe illness rates and COVID-19 mortality rates are lower than flu . There is also a saying in society that "dynamic zeroing" is given up, but it is precisely at this time that we must correctly attribute it and keep our greatest advantage and not give up.
This time, it was announced that in 2022, the global death toll of new crown has exceeded 1 million. Maria van Kochoff, head of COVID-19 response technology at the World Health Organization, also bluntly stated in a Q&A live broadcast event on the 26th that the death toll of 1 million is "heartbreaking". The detection, treatment, vaccines and other public health measures to control this virus have played a role, but so many people still die from COVID-19.
News News Agency said that in the past week alone, the WHO received more than 5.3 million new confirmed cases.
In other words, controls the detection, treatment, vaccine and other public health measures of this virus have all played a role, but which factor has taken the core and key role?
This can actually be said to compare the data and explain the problem. is currently in the domestic situation. Very authoritative experts have used the mortality rate of influenza and the new crown. They believe that the mortality rate of the new crown is lower than that of influenza, and they can immediately give up the intention of "dynamic zeroing". But before this speech was finished, the collapse of the new crown in a big city suddenly blocked the mania of this voice. But it is very regrettable that since the number of infections in China is a "small sample" or other reasons, we have never seen convincing domestic statistical data about sequelae and vaccine effects. This time, the data provided by the United Nations and US think tank is very valuable and is conducive to our correct attribution and always adhere to the institutional advantages and not relax.
First, in the United States, the number of people with sequelae of COVID-19 is as high as 16 million (only between the ages of 18 and 65), of which up to 4 million Americans who work full-time cannot work , which shows that we simply compare the mortality rate of COVID-19 and influenza, which is not comprehensive, especially using this as a basis for relaxing epidemic prevention and control measures, which is even more wrong.
Second, The World Health Organization announced that 1 million people died of COVID-19 in 2022. This is obviously only the data from the first eight months, and it is the data when testing, treatment, vaccines and other public health measures have played a role. It is obvious that China's ultra-low infections and deaths do not come from vaccines. Other countries, especially the United States, have not low vaccine injection rates, and North Korea even has less vaccine injections. The correct attribution should be testing, treatment, especially public health measures, which is what we call "dynamic clearance". Of course, this detection and treatment method is also closely related. The two sets of data of
can be confirmed to show that even if we completely give up "dynamic clearance" as some people say, and lie down like the United States and Europe, the life and physical losses, including economic losses, are still huge, and it is certain that they will exceed the current situation.In other words, China's "dynamic zeroing" is the most responsible way to life and economy around the world. I really don't know what the intention is to give up?
Another thing that is certain is that China's "dynamic zeroing" is the most fair way to the broadest masses of the people. is easy to understand. Currently, nucleic acid testing , regional blockade, and centralized treatment ensure the highest degree of fairness in terms of systems and resources. If one party is in trouble, the support from all parties is the greatest possible difference. The Chinese are a true community of shared future under the background of the epidemic.
Therefore, our current focus is on how to do a good job of "dynamic clearing", rather than canceling "dynamic clearing". In terms of how to do a good job in , we still have a lot of work to do, which can reduce economic losses to a greater extent, take into account the safety of people's lives and survival safety, and reach a new stage of higher quality. How to achieve high quality in
? We should still emphasize that our focus should not be on whether to adhere to "dynamic zeroing", but how to do better, such as the problem of mutual recognition of nucleic acid testing, the problem of crowd gathering for nucleic acids, and the problem of increasing the number of isolation measures in various places. For this time, I went from Tibet to Sichuan. Although I basically did continuous calculations in Tibet and did not go through the risk zone, I entered Sichuan and entered nucleic acid five times in seven days. In other words, nucleic acids in Sichuan and Tibet did not achieve mutual recognition. This is actually abandoning all the nucleic acid testing and risk division achievements. It is not only wasting the time of the banned personnel, but also the national resources and the efforts of other regions. As long as it is improved, it is wrong, as long as the notice of the State Council is firmly implemented, the scope of the blockade will be reduced by a large part.
Maria van Kochoff Data picture
Finally, I feel it is necessary to review the few words Kochoff, head of the new crown epidemic response technology of WHO . He believes that the COVID-19 pandemic is not over yet, but the epidemic can be brought to an end while people continue to live their daily lives. " we just need to think more and be more cautious. "
Kokhof was also talking about the topic of "coexisting with the new coronavirus" during the live broadcast. She said: " Many people are talking about coexisting with the new coronavirus, but this must be coexisting in a responsible way. "
" This year, 1 million people died of COVID-19, which is not called coexisting with the new coronavirus; 15,000 people die every week, which is not called coexisting with the new coronavirus. "Kokhof said.
Don't you think so? The ideal method in Kokhov's mind is China's "dynamic zeroing" method? Why do we give up such a good way?
in one sentence summary: At present, we should not worry about whether to give up "dynamic zeroing", but think about how to do it better!
Qin'an, August 29, 2022, Wenjiang, Chengdu.
