Peng Wenzheng published a post on the matter on the 23rd. He first said, "1450+817, look up the British Administrative Court judgment word for word in the dictionary." The British Administrative Court clearly ruled: On March 31, 2021, the electronic data within LSE In the email,

former Peng Wenzheng . (Taiwan's "China News Network" file photo)

Lin Huanqiang, a scholar in the United States who has long followed Tsai Ing-wen's "paper scandal", said on Facebook on the 22nd that LSE the highest authority had responded to the ICO (British Information Special Agency) in the past. During the investigation and consultation of the Appointment Officer's Office), he denied possessing Tsai Ing-wen's so-called "list of doctoral oral examination committee members" and "oral examination report", and accidentally leaked that Mr. Hayne, the legal director of LSE, was questioned for colluding with false documents across the sea in the past, and the British first-instance administrative In the judgment issued on June 20 this year, the court certified the so-called "Hain's collusion incident"!

Peng Wenzheng published a post on the matter on the 23rd. He first said, "1450+817, look up the British Administrative Court judgment word for word in the dictionary." The British Administrative Court clearly ruled: On March 31, 2021, LSE internal In the email, the name of the so-called external committee member Mr. ZZ (actually Richard Dale) was mentioned, which was perjury provided by Tsai Ing-wen.

Peng Wenzheng also named these perjured evidences, "The evil official of the Ministry of Justice in the UK, Kristen S. T. Chen, colluded with LSE internal personnel to send these forged evidences to the Beijing Prosecutor's Office as fake official certificates to prosecute me."

Regarding the accusations made by Lin Huanqiang and Peng Wenzheng, Lien Yuanlong and Chang Richang, the appointed lawyers of Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen, issued a "clarification statement" on the 23rd, pointing out that the content of the judgment made by the British Lower Court on June 20, 2022 , there is no accusation that Tsai Ing-wen has colluded with LSE insiders or provided perjury; it also stated that the remarks made by Lin Huanqiang and Peng Wenzheng were untrue, and called on those who spread false information to pay attention to legal responsibilities. (Source: Taiwan's "China News Network")