In order to implement "making a fortune", Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu finally proposed a major plan a few days ago, which is to establish a free trade special economic zone in Kaohsiung City.

Taiwanese baggage shop, Guoyu finds a way out! In order to implement "making a fortune", Kaohsiung Mayor Han Guoyu finally proposed a major plan a few days ago, which is to establish a free trade special economic zone in Kaohsiung City . As soon as this issue was raised, the entire Democratic Progressive Party immediately started team fighting mode and insisted on clinging to this bone. This is another good show.

First, let’s talk about this free trade special economic zone. You know, many years ago, Taiwan's Kaohsiung Port was once ranked third or fourth in the world. However, under the painstaking governance of the Democratic Progressive Party for many years, the ranking has continued to decline, and there is no trace of the top ten. The greatest significance of this special zone is to activate the "backwater" of Kaohsiung.

The Kuomintang and the entire blue camp are very supportive of Han Kuo-yu's proposal, and the island's industrial and commercial groups also like it. Lin Bofeng, chairman of the Taiwan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said that although Kaohsiung now also has a free port zone, the help is limited and the establishment of a special zone is very necessary.

However, these reactions are particularly harsh in the ears of the Green Camp leaders. Not surprisingly, there is almost overwhelming opposition from the Green Camp, from the "Executive President", heads of ministries and committees to public opinion representatives.

Here I would like to explain something to you. There are naturally a lot of things involved in establishing a special economic zone, but the core one is to develop a high value-added processing industry for agricultural products. This is the focus of the dispute between the blue and green parties. There are a lot of objections to Lvying under various names, but in summary there are two main points:

1. When you build this special economic zone, you will inevitably import a large amount of agricultural products. Will that not affect the income of farmers on the island?

2. If you receive a large number of orders from the mainland in the future, won’t you be “united front” by the mainland?

Regarding these two doubts, does Han Guoyu have any countermeasures? certainly! Because the establishment of a free trade special economic zone in Kaohsiung City is not a new political idea at all. It was proposed more than 20 years ago.

and so on! 20 years ago? Then why didn't it pass? Wasn't it true that the Kuomintang was in power for a long period of time? And the "Legislative Yuan" has more than half!

Kuomintang "legislator" Fei Hongtai said bluntly in the program that it was only Ma Ying-jeou who lacked courage!

Say it or not, Fei Hongtai’s assertion is really not easy to refute ~ So in the program, senior media person Zhao Shaokang suggested that the Kuomintang should "repent". The Taiwanese people once gave you a chance, but in the end nothing could be passed.

Zhao Shaokang further pointed out that in order to prevent this kind of thing from happening again, a "common political opinion" should be formulated before the election of "legislators". The Kuomintang must live up to it in the future. Anyone who disagrees should get out now.

Look, these media people have such a bad temper. They use vulgar words like "get out" as they say. Regarding Zhao Shaokang's statement and tone, Uncle Tia can only say one thing:

The above discussions are all in the past. Let's take a closer look at how Han Guoyu responded to Green Camp's question about the 2.0 version of the Kaohsiung Free Trade Special Economic Zone proposed this time. of.

First of all, regarding the first question, "the establishment of special economic zones has harmed Taiwanese farmers." Kuomintang "legislator" Zeng Mingzong is one of the drafters of this political opinion. He pointed out that in the original version, 10% of processed products could be sold on the island. This time, in version 2.0, in order to avoid the third point mentioned by Luying For one reason, 10% of the quota was also cut off.

Not only that, version 2.0 also stipulates that all agricultural products entering the island must be unavailable in Taiwan, and will be approved by the Taiwan authorities' "Council of Agriculture". If not approved, they will not be imported. So the first reason is just a false issue.

Regarding this, Zhao Shaokang said, didn’t Taiwan rely on processing and export zones in the past? What's so strange!

As for the so-called "united front" issue, it is actually a grand strategy of the Green Camp.As 2020 is getting closer, the Tsai Ing-wen administration’s cross-strait and economic policies have caused too much public dissatisfaction. If she wants to stabilize her position in the 2020 election, there is only one card left to play, and that is to escalate cross-strait antagonism. Create panic on the island.

In order to implement this strategy, you can see that the Green Camp has been frequently provocative recently, specifically picking up the topic of "unification and independence" to make trouble. Su Zhenchang's "broom theory" a while ago is also an example. Regarding Han Guoyu, the most popular member of the blue camp, Su Zhenchang also unswervingly turned economic issues into political issues and put forward the "Four Nos" principle.

I won’t go into details about the specific content of the “Four Nos” here, because no matter how many “nos” there are, they are all one “no” in the final analysis: whatever Han Kuo-yu proposes, you have to say “no”.

is more interesting What's more, Zeng Mingzong broke the news that he planned to propose version 2.0 of the free trade special economic zone bill. "I still have the version in hand." Before the content was exposed, Su Zhenchang and his officials were already scolding him in order to oppose it. Objection, neither this nor that, the media people asked Su Zhenchang, "Then what do you want? "

Media person Chen Fengxin put it more directly. What we Taiwanese need are leaders who can create opportunities. If you can only say no, no, no, then please leave!

As for whether to leave and when to leave, it depends 2020~

Statement: This article is a work submitted by the "Taiwan Baggage Shop" team. The content is the author's personal opinion and has nothing to do with China Taiwan Network