Talking back to "Thor 3", it is a qualified popcorn movie, but in fact, the movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe are not all brainless "popcorn". There are also many movies with profound connotations and thoughts, but Thor is This movie seems to have profound ideological conno

2024/06/2311:27:33 hotcomm 1320

The superheroes created by Marvel all have one characteristic, and that is humanity. The word "hero" is powerful and perfect in the inherent concept, but in Marvel's writing, heroes have flawed personalities and complex personalities, and their lives may be even more messy, because such a setting will make superheroes closer to ordinary people. , to increase the sense of intimacy. ——"Thor: Ragnarok"

's evaluation of Thor 3

Marvel Cinematic Universe has been shaping superheroes who are close to mortals, and the movies they shoot are also changed according to fan preferences and market demand, just like those big movies What the director said after watching the Marvel movie is the same as "a popcorn movie without connotation." Indeed, it is right to say that Marvel movies are popcorn movies, because Marvel Studios has set the positioning of the movie from the beginning. For the fan base and entertainment film direction, the movie is only made for those who are interested in these.

Talking back to

Going back to "Thor 3", it is a qualified popcorn movie, but in fact, the movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe are not all brainless "popcorn". There are also many movies with profound connotations and thoughts, but Thor This movie, which seems to have profound ideological connotations, is actually a very successful popcorn comedy. However, there is a tragedy hidden under the comedy surface, but this tragedy does not have much profound meaning. It is just a tragedy. sad.

Talking back to

Things that are arranged and set cannot be called tragedies. The best tragedies are often accidental. The tragedy of the movie "Twilight of the Gods" was arranged from the beginning. All the viewers knew the tragic ending. After watching Thor and Loki Hulk fight and fight for most of the plot, the arranged tragedy was Put it on the stage and show it to the audience, and then the audience will feel the arranged tragedy happening in a comedy atmosphere.

Talking back to

So what is an accidental tragedy? The accidental tragedy was that after Thor witnessed Ragnarok, he encountered Thanos when he was carrying a spaceship full of people to the earth. This is something that no audience is aware of, and this is something that Thor is completely unaware of, so when Avengers 3 opens, seeing the spaceship being destroyed and Loki being killed by Thanos, this feeling of sadness can be contagious. To the audience, no one expected that Loki would die at the beginning of Avengers 3.

Talking back to

The movie "Thor: Ragnarok" is still a strong Marvel style, adding a variety of elements into one movie. In the tense and exciting atmosphere, it uses the relaxed and humorous characters of Thor and Loki. The language and behavior, as well as Hulk's own sense of humor, create a comedy atmosphere for the audience. Although Thor must race against time to return to Asgard, the audience does not feel the tension. Everyone was laughing, and the second half of the plot was exciting.

Talking back to

The audience loved this movie very much. Although the tragedy was not considered a success, the audience felt the joy brought by this movie. This is enough to prove that this is a successful Marvel movie and a qualified popcorn movie. If you are looking for connotations in this movie, you will probably find some one-sided or shallow connotations, but this does not prevent it from being an excellent movie, whether it is a popcorn or a literary film with connotations. , what the audience likes is a good movie.

Talking back to

Opinions on the director

What many viewers don’t know is that the three Thor movies were actually directed by three different directors. When watching these three movies together, you can see Thor’s In life experience, Thor has new growth at every stage. This is not because the three directors colluded, but because the three directors all knew that Thor was a very important character and he needed to grow, so they directed them respectively. The growth of Thor is arranged in the movie.

Talking back to

The Thor created by Kenneth Branagh, the director of "Thor 1", is obviously more interesting and humorous. At that time, Thor was an arrogant and reckless god, and his actions may trigger a war. , so he arranged for Thor to learn from scratch how to become a "mortal", then a "hero", and finally a "god".The whole film is humorous and briskly paced, and even when it comes to the final battle, it's hard to feel tense.

Talking back to

Because everything is so natural, Thor will grow up and defeat Loki, so it is difficult for the audience to feel other emotions other than joy. Only when Loki roars in pain and expresses his feelings, to Loki Generate a little sympathy. Thor in the hands of this director is closer to a mortal and real enough.

Talking back to

Alan Taylor, the director of "Thor: The Dark World", is the director with the least personal style. The "Thor: 2" filmed by him is very regular, as if it is step-by-step, everything follows the script and what has been imagined. direction to execute. But "Thor 2" has still become a qualified popcorn movie in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but it is like an indispensable cog in the complex Marvel Cinematic Universe, important but inconspicuous.

Talking back to

If you look at the director's resume, you will find that before filming "Thor: The Dark World", the director had only filmed 5 movies, none of which were very outstanding. It is obvious that this director is good at filming TV series, because in the 20 years from 1997 to 2017, the director filmed 16 TV series. Perhaps because it has become a habit to shoot according to the scripts of TV series, the director lacks personal style. For Thor 2, this is a pity.

Talking back to

The director of "Thor: Ragnarok" is Taika Waititi. It is obvious that he is a director with a strong personal style, which can be felt in the movie Ragnarok. He is good at shooting comedies. director, which allowed him to add a lot of comedy elements that he is good at when filming "Thor 3", and they were all very successful. If the author is asked to evaluate, then "Thor 3" is undoubtedly the most successful Thor movie series so far.

Talking back to

It's just a pity from a personal point of view, because Taika Waititi's strong personal comedy style also made "Thor 3", which was supposed to have a sad plot, not so easy to sad, and even still The whole process is full of passion, which may be the reason why the director cannot balance the two styles, but the current results have been very successful.

Talking back to

Written at the end

"Thor: Ragnarok" is a movie worth watching, but please be sure to put aside your own thoughts about whether the movie has enough thoughts and connotations, otherwise it will be difficult to feel the movie The charm and the happiness it brings, Marvel Studios' movies are mainly about bringing people happiness, and the same is true for "Thor 3".

Talking back to

The above is a rough interpretation of the movie "Thor: Ragnarok". If you like this article, you can follow and like it. If you have different thoughts and opinions, you might as well leave a message in the comment area. Thank you for reading~

hotcomm Category Latest News