I have seen a lot of discussions about "911" on the Internet these days.
What’s surprising is that so many new public celebrities said they felt “very happy” when they learned that “911” happened.
Some even said that the victims of the "911" incident did not deserve sympathy because their country was a "hegemonic" country...
Open the skylight and speak out.
In the field of self-media, criticizing the United States is now a popular trend, and inciting hatred against the United States is considered a "wealth code."
This is something everyone knows and there is nothing to hide.
However, Mencius said: is not better for oneself than .
No matter what you do, you must have a degree! You have to know when enough is enough and stop when you feel good! In order to attract traffic and popularity,
applauds terrorist attacks and beautifies terrorists. This has broken through the lowest bottom line of morality and humanity!
Terrorism is the enemy of the whole world!
Terrorists are villains who can be punished by everyone in the world!
The bottom line is that as long as there is still a trace of humanity left, one should not be tempted!
Immortal is really curious: Do those people who applaud terrorist attacks really know what "terrorism" is?
"Terrorism" in " Swordsman "
In Jin Yong's novel "Swordsman", the first confusion the protagonist Linghu Chong encountered was whether to be a "terrorist".
After Liu Zhengfeng was rescued from Hengyang City by Qu Yang , the two performed "The Swordsman" by the waterfall, and Songshan sect Fei Bin followed.
At this time, both Qu Yang and Liu Zhengfeng had lost their hearts and had no power to fight back. Although Qu Yang's granddaughter Qu Feiyan was good at martial arts, she was only eleven or twelve years old and was still a minor.
Under this situation, Fei Bin still held the purpose of "eliminating the roots" and wanted to kill them all.
According to the rules of the world at that time, their group belonged to the "old, weak, sick and disabled" and had no ability to resist, so they should not be attacked again.
It was precisely because of this most basic humanitarian spirit that Linghu Chong stepped forward to stop Fei Bin.
However, Fei Bin not only refused to listen to the advice, but also wanted to kill Linghu Chong and Yilin.
At this time, Fei Bin was actually very close to being a "terrorist".
Because for the political opinions of the Songshan sect, he killed non-combatants and people who had no ability to resist, even at the expense of innocent comrades.
If viewed from a narrow perspective of the Songshan Sect, Fei Bin's behavior is not only not hateful, but is very close to a "hero".
Because he marched forward bravely for the benefit of the sect, even if his hands were stained with blood.
But what about from the perspective of Jianghu?
What kind of impact will his behavior of killing good people and taking credit for the sake of the sect's interests have on the atmosphere of the entire world?
Every "terrorist" feels that he is a "hero". They all feel that they do things that harm others and do not benefit themselves for a great goal.
However, there is a question that cannot be avoided: the location of Heimuya, the main altar of Demon Cult , is not a secret. Why did Fei Bin and even Zuo Lengchan not dare to attack Heimuya? The reason for
is simple: it can’t be beaten! Don't dare to go!
Because they know that their abilities are insufficient and that they are not courageous, they do not dare to provoke the other party's combatants, but only dare to take it out on the old, weak, sick and disabled of the other party.
Mr. Mo Da, who later killed Fei Bin, actually committed an attack and did not admit it after the attack.
But why do readers not think he is despicable, but think he is very decent?
The reason is that Fei Bin, whom Mr. Mo Da attacked, was a combatant. In the case of unequal strength, combatants attack combatants and win. This has been called "outwitness" since ancient times.
Attacking non-combatants, no matter what the cause, is called "unconscionable"!
Yue Buqun and turning on the lamp
In fact, even before the topic of "911", Lukwen had already stepped on the red line of turning on the lamp.
In the words of Lukwin and other new public intellectuals, pulling the lamp turned out to be the so-called "patriot"...
In fact, "The Swordsman" has already made a very vivid portrayal of people like pulling the lamp - "The gentleman" Sword" Yue Buqun.
In "The Swordsman", Yue Buqun once questioned Linghu Chong righteously:
"You knew that the girl named Qu was a member of the demon sect, why didn't you kill her with one sword? Although her grandfather is yours There is a life-saving grace, but this is obviously a way for people from the Demon Sect to provoke our Wuyue Sword Sect. You are not a fool, how could you not know that there is actually a huge conspiracy hidden inside when someone saves your life? "
Yue Buqun’s words can simply be used as a sample of how terrorist bosses “brainwash” their subordinates.
First: Whether the enemy is old, weak, women or children, they should all be killed with one sword.
Second: Even if the enemy saves your life, he will be ungrateful immediately.
Third: No matter what good things the enemy does, there must be a conspiracy.
But did Yue Buqun fulfill these three narrow and extreme requirements?
For the first time, Yue Buqun met Lan Fenghuang, the leader of the Five Poison Sect, on a ship on the Yellow River.
He knew clearly that the Five Poisons was a cult. Not only did he not kill the "witch" Lan Fenghuang with one sword, but he automatically changed the name of "Five Poisons" to "Five Immortals" and asked "Master Lan, how is she?"
The second time, when the Shaolin Temple orthodox leaders gathered together, he saw that Ren Woxing and Xiang Wentian did not rush forward and "kill them with one sword", but instead entangled with the "little thief" Linghu Chong. Qing...
For the third time, he accidentally caught Ren Yingying, the number one "witch" in the Demon Cult. Ren Yingying , but before Ren Yingying exposed the scandal of his "self-imposed palace", he himself said that because of her father, he would do whatever he wanted. In terms of face, I didn’t plan to kill her...
asked his disciples to "work hard without caring about their own safety", but he always "protected himself wisely".
requires his disciples to be "ungrateful" to their enemies, but he always looks for opportunities to "build relationships" with his enemies. What kind of "hero" are people like
considered?
All terrorist bosses are basically like this.
They hide in a safe place and let the people below die. While
attacks innocent people, most of them flirt with intelligence agencies such as the CIA , and sometimes even make "deals" with them.
A dead Taoist friend is not a poor Taoist.
This is a common characteristic of almost all terrorist organizations.
Moreover, Ledeng was originally from Saudi Arabia, but his Saudi nationality was later revoked by Saudi Arabia. After
got into the catastrophic "911", he went to Afghanistan and made Afghans suffer for more than 20 years. What kind of "patriot" is he? Which "country" does he love?
What’s even more interesting is that it has always been the Americans themselves who said that La Deng was the main planner of the “911” incident.
Ledeng himself has repeatedly denied that he was the mastermind behind the "911" incident, and even claimed that the doctrines I believe in do not allow me to do such a thing.
In this case, there are only two possibilities:
Either he is pulling the wool over his shoulder and not taking responsibility as a human being. He dares not to recognize the fruits of the sacrifices of so many "fellow Taoists"!
Or those filial sons and grandsons who licked him cried to the wrong grave by burning newspapers! The "911" incident was not done by him at all!
be a human being! Stay away from extreme terrorism!
In "The Swordsman", which is positioned as a "political allegory", Jin Yong expresses a simple and practical philosophy of life through the character of Linghu Chong: We are destined to have no power to change the turbid world, but we can at least maintain our innocence. .
Linghu Chong's unwillingness to sacrifice the most basic bottom line of human nature for the so-called "righteousness" seems a bit negative in the book.
But in reality it is already extremely difficult!
In this world, there are actually no evil people who strive to destroy the world.
At least nine and a half out of ten of the evil people who really cause chaos in the world are those who claim to be for "righteousness", inciting others to come forward and serve as cannon fodder for their own "righteousness" mixed with selfish interests!
Yue Buqun asked Linghu Chong to be ungrateful regardless of right and wrong in the name of "righteousness and evil".
In the name of "righteousness", this kind of person induces others to break through the most basic bottom line of being a human being and engage in acts that are harmful to nature! It is the most basic and commonly used means of all terrorism.
Linghu Chong was not fooled by the "righteousness" spoken by others. Regardless of the other party's coercion or inducement, he insisted on not violating the most basic bottom line of human principles for the sake of other people's "righteousness". This kind of persistence is what he calls "spiritual independence."
Every terrorist who attacks innocent people thinks he is a "hero."
Every unscrupulous terrorist organization advertises that it is defending some "great cause"!
While they long for recognition from the world, they massacre innocent civilians without mercy.
If today we agree with the extreme spirit that launched the "911" incident and the extreme means of killing innocent people, what will our world look like tomorrow?
The reason why terrorism makes countries all over the world feel like they are facing a formidable enemy is because its attack targets and methods are uncertain. They can use the lowest cost to cause turmoil anywhere to satisfy the desires of a small group of people. selfish desires.
They will attack wherever there are many people, and they will use whatever is useful.
They create panic and chaos through massacres to attract the world's attention in order to obtain bargaining chips to enhance their status.
For them, the more people die, the better; because then the world has to face up to their demands.
As for whether the deceased were innocent or not, how many families will be broken up as a result is not a consideration at all!
No matter what the "righteousness" is, it is extremely stupid to sympathize with those who support terrorists! Extremely ugly!
In recent years, new intellectuals have tried to figure out the public's thoughts, and in order to attract traffic, they have advocated and incited the spirit of extremism and even terrorism. This is an extremely dangerous social phenomenon!
Foreign countries are far away from us, but the motherland is at our feet!
If "sissy culture" and online games are "spiritual opium", then terrorism and extremism can be spiritual viruses that make people unwilling to die!
How big is the distance between praising and identifying with them and imitating them?
In recent years, how many scumbags have appeared in our society who are unwilling to die a good death, and even kill innocent people, even children in kindergartens, before they die? Are extreme scum like
influenced by the spirit of terrorism? Is there any causal relationship with the new public intellectuals advocating and inciting extremism?
"Patriotism" should not be a refuge for gangsters, let alone an excuse to disturb the world's people!
applauds terrorist attacks and applauds terrorism. Ordinary people may just lack knowledge, but the new intellectuals can be regarded as deliberately causing harm to the country and the people!
Please take a look at today's world. In countries where extremism is prevalent, which country is not suffering from internal and external troubles and the people are in dire straits?
To be fair.
When you and your family are eating hot pot and singing songs, suddenly someone waves a butcher knife and throws explosives at you for a "righteousness" that you have never heard of. Is this kind of life really what you want?
