In ancient times, there was Confucius who was trapped between Chen and Cai and did not forget to teach and play the piano. There was also Liu Jin who demoted officials and was imprisoned for those who refused to bribe. Today, there are corrupt officials being investigated, and there are also village officials who go to the countryside without asking for anything in return.
Since ancient times, material pursuit and spiritual pursuit have been topics of endless debate among people. It seems that choosing any side will cause the balance to be instantly unbalanced and receive countless comments and opinions.
Precious cultural relics also carry extraordinary significance.
When it comes to cultural relics, the country has always attached great importance to cherishing them. However, China's long history has witnessed many inevitable wars and turbulence, and a series of events such as territorial cession and compensation demanded by foreign forces.
Many priceless and meaningful cultural relics are still wandering around. The country does not hesitate to spend a lot of money to purchase them from overseas and exchange them with various conditions, just to allow various cultural relics to cross the ocean and return them home safely.
When ordinary people or even people living in poverty hold national cultural relics, how will they treat these priceless treasures? Faced with the so-called trade-off between value and meaning, what kind of extensive discussion will their actions trigger?
An old man attracted everyone's attention because he sold the knife given to him by Puyi . A person who can carry a sword and stand in power must have an extraordinary status. The value of the short knife that was rewarded after meritorious service and the natural knife produced by the official kiln will not be low.
And after the erosion of time, this knife has also been labeled as a "cultural relic". It can naturally fetch a good price, but at the same time it will also be attached with great significance and spiritual value.
When he decided to sell the knife, the old man also explained to everyone that the knife had been passed down from generation to generation as a "family heirloom". If he hadn't been living in a tight situation and had no other choice, he would have been reluctant to sell it .
Expert appraisal also confirmed that this knife is indeed a cultural relic from the Qing Dynasty . It was made with superb craftsmanship and has engraved words on it. It is exquisite in workmanship, valuable and of great significance.
Faced with the origin of this knife, there are two opinions. One is that the old man's ancestor served as Puyi's personal bodyguard when he was in exile. He repeatedly protected him and made great achievements, so Puyi rewarded this personal bodyguard with this short sword.
Another theory is that Emperor Puyi, who succeeded to the throne at a young age, was playing in the palace. While playing, a male goat was offended, causing the goat to try to fight back. The young Emperor Puyi had not yet reacted, which almost caused a catastrophe. At this time, a guard around him pulled it away and prevented the accident, so he was rewarded with this precious dagger.
Our ancestors have always attached great importance to it, but it has been passed down to this day that the old man decided to sell it because of his family's financial difficulties. Experts on cultural relics heard about the old man's move and immediately came to persuade the old man.
wanted to persuade the old man to hand over this "cultural relic" with great research value and practical value to the country, but what the experts did not expect was that the old man simply said "not qualified" and simply rejected the expert's proposal, leaving the expert speechless.
The last knife was sold at auction for five million. Many industry experts believe that this will damage the intrinsic value of cultural relics, and this incident has also triggered heated discussions among a large number of people.
Some people think that experts can persuade the elderly with price, and there is no need to use "spiritual pursuit" as the basis of persuasion to an ordinary farmer. Others think that the elderly ignore the meaning behind the cultural relics of their ancestors and only pursue changing the lives of their own generation.
There was a huge crowd, and there were endless comments.
Suddenly, the public opinion came overwhelmingly, drowning everyone's voice in an instant. Some people stand on the commanding heights of morality and arrogantly spurn the worldliness of the elderly, while some people stand at the foot of materialism and talk about the hardships of the world.
is nothing more than divided into two factions, one demanding spiritual luxury, and the other crying about the difficulty of the world.Are spirit and matter two black and white, naked opposites?
Perhaps there is no need to make a very strong and rigid distinction between the two.. A spiritual life separated from material things is extremely vain and impossible to realize. If you completely give up spiritual pursuit, you will become an unhealthy soul.
When faced with corrupt officials accepting bribes, we are shocked, and even condemn or even insult them from the commanding heights, because the extent of their pursuit is far beyond what we can imagine. When faced with the embarrassment of old people selling family heirlooms, there are still some people who cannot understand, because the embarrassment of life has not come to us.
As a person who cannot empathize with others, only words can describe without any effort.
When faced with beautifully made government products, I believe that what the elderly value is not just the price tag on them due to the title of "cultural relics". They have been passed down and protected by ancestors from generation to generation. The elderly will not fail to understand their value and the meaning they represent, and they will naturally not lose their determination to protect and pass them on to the next generation.
But if there is really no rice to cook at home, and the situation is such that even the most basic needs for survival cannot be met. It is cold, there is no thick clothing, and the sky is dark, there is no warm food. When survival becomes a problem, can the belief in guarding a beautiful dagger really override the instinct of survival?
So the old man chose the most direct and basic survival instinct, and faced the professional rhetoric of industry experts and the overwhelming accusations from a group of strangers who did not know each other and could not empathize with him.
He used the most "simple and crude" family matter as a rebuttal, and the word "qualification" became a strong and exquisite dagger, stinging the "spiritual pursuit" that some people considered very important, and thus arousing strong criticism from everyone. However, we have no way of verifying whether this approach harms the value and significance of the "cultural relics" themselves. Everyone has their own opinions.
It is the right of the elderly to dispose of their own belongings. However, there is no conclusion yet on whether the handing over of cultural relics to the state also carries with it a series of obligations that should be fulfilled in an ideal moral manner such as maintaining national cultural confidence and protecting cultural relics.
Conclusion
Neither you nor I are on both sides of the conflict, nor do we have the complete ability to make objective and fair comments and discuss right and wrong.
As the recipients of information, the occurrence of this incident can arouse our attention and thinking, which far exceeds the meaning of commenting on right or wrong. Pursuing spirituality or materialism has been an eternal choice since ancient times, and it is also a debate that is always inconclusive. The choices made and the comments made conceal everyone's life experience and spiritual thinking, and they are bound to be the same.
As the saying goes, “It is difficult for an upright official to deal with household chores,” even we do not have enough confidence to prove that we can bear the title of “upright official.”
The old man sold the imperial kiln sword given by Pu Yi for five million, triggering the debate between "spirituality" and "materiality" that has been debated since ancient times. It also tells the conflict between "power" and "obligation". Thousands of viewers expressed their feelings, but we are not in the center of the whirlpool. As ripples, we can only make decisions based on the center of the whirlpool.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-