Is Yuan Chonghuan's case an unjust case? In fact, this has to be viewed from two aspects. If you look at the charges he was executed, he must be wronged. After all, Yuan Chonghuan and Governor Yuan could not be a traitor. Huang Taiji could bribe Zu Dashou, but could not bribe Yuan Chonghuan. After all, Yuan Chonghuan's level was much higher than Zu Dashou, and the price he paid was mostly gone. Huang Taiji could not afford to pay the money, and even if he could afford it, Yuan Chonghuan might not buy it.
Who is Yuan Chonghuan? The local emperor of Liaodong, Huang Taiji really wanted to buy him, so he probably had to exchange his position with him. Even if it was changed, Yuan Chonghuan might not necessarily change it. What's more, there was a big grudge between Huang Taiji and Yuan Chonghuan, and Yuan Chonghuan killed his father Nurhaci. From an objective reality, Yuan Chonghuan was also a contribution to Daming. After all, in terms of defense, he also killed Nurhaci and defended the king in Beijing.
But this cannot offset his sins. That is what he brags about pacifying Liaodong in five years and finally under the city of Beijing. Killing him for a hundred times is not unfair. I spent a lot of money and gave the power to a large enough level. You killed the people sent by the emperor, but you ended up being in Beijing. Isn’t this a serious dereliction of duty? No matter which normal king it is, he can't stand his bragging and negligence! Chongzhen was very restrained when he could tolerate Huang Taiji and then kill him! Therefore, Yuan Chonghuan died at all. Although he was worthy of the king and the people in the great festival, as the commander of Liaodong, he was very ambitious and talented, and did not brag about taxes. This is a sin! It is also a deception for the king and the people, and it is an unforgivable deception of sin!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-