This is simply ridiculous for people with common sense, especially when we learn about the specific content of their argument, it is even more infuriating. Western robbers are not only ridiculous, but also very shameless!

[Western pseudo-history] Why are the Indians basically dead, while the African blacks live?

After the death of the Queen of England, a debate broke out between Western media: Should we pay African black people due to the black slave trade?

These robbers actually publicly argued about this issue on TV! This is simply ridiculous for people with common sense, especially when we learn about the specific content of their argument, it is even more infuriating. Western robbers are not only ridiculous, but also very shameless!

English Queen is dead. Africans demand that the West apologize and compensate for the crimes committed by the slave trade that year. American media CNN host Lemon interviewed British royal expert Fordwich to see what this Fordwich said nonsense:

If those people really want to get compensation, they need to trace back to the starting point of the slave trade supply chain. What is the starting point of the slave trade supply chain? Fordwich said it was the chiefs of Africa who arrested the black people themselves and placed them on the beach to buy them with Western white skins. The starting point is: African chiefs, not Westerners.

On the contrary, she also praised the United Kingdom, saying that Britain was the first country in the world to abolish the black slave trade, and more than 2,000 British soldiers died in order to abolish the black slave trade. Therefore, the families of these more than 2,000 British soldiers should be compensated, not African blacks.

Blanking the Western black slave trade into this way shows that the West is despicable, shameless and shameless in history.

What is the truth of history? As long as we understand the truth of this history, we will understand why the American Indians were almost killed, the indigenous people of Oceania were killed, and why the black Africans could survive to this day!

So, what is the truth about the black slave trade?

Why should African chiefs catch black people and give them white skins?

Answer: Because if you don’t do this, the chiefs will all die. The final result is: black people will still be sold, but the chiefs will be killed by white-skinned. This is much more expensive to sell black slaves, so white skin is very smart and oppresses the chiefs to help them catch black slaves, and then gives the chiefs good.

Please think about the Qing Dynasty in China. Why didn’t Western robbers directly overthrow Qing and then directly enslave the Chinese people? Western white skins have done it and found that the cost is too high. If they overthrew the Qing Dynasty and directly enslaved the Chinese people, the Qing Dynasty would immediately join forces with the Chinese people to fight against the white skins. For example, Cixi uses Boxer to fight with Eight-Nation Alliance . If it were not used, if the Qing army really cooperated with the Boxer gang, the Eight-Nation Alliance would not be able to defeat it at all! In fact, after conquering Beijing, the Eight-Nation Alliance marched to Xi'an, was defeated by the Qing army and the Chinese people, retreated back to Beijing, and then released the wind and demanded peace talks. The commander-in-chief of the Eight-Nation Alliance at that time, Wadesi said: No matter Europe, America, or Japan, there is no brain power or military force to rule one-quarter of the living creatures in this world. What is the best way? It is to support the Qing government led by Cixi and enslave China through the Qing Dynasty.

Where did this experience come from? It comes from the African black slave trade. Kill all the chiefs and sell black slaves, it is unpaid! Collusion with chiefs and selling black slaves is even lower!

This is the historical truth, what is the result? What did Western historians wash it into? It is your king who wants to sell people, and the starting point is here! Therefore, if you want to compensate, you have to find your king! They are so shameless!

The question is here, why don’t Britain and the United States catch slaves directly from the Indians? The answer given by Western historians is: Indians are unwilling to be slaves.Are black Africans willing to be slaves? What is the real reason for

? Because the Indians are Native Americans, if you arrest them today, they can run away tomorrow and call their tribesmen to smash your factory! When African blacks arrived in America, where did they go? If you have no place to run, you can only be a black slave; by the same token, why don’t you use black people to develop in the western United States? And what about using Chinese people? Because Chinese people are smarter, harder and more patient! This is the reason why the Chinese people are driven back to China after the railway is built!

It is precisely because the Indians and the indigenous people of Oceania cannot be enslaved and cannot be slaves from Europe and the United States, so their fate is very miserable! Almost all killed! This is the source of the disappearance of Indians and the natives of Oceania.

Western historians create pseudo-history, but this is more than that. They still make fake Chinese history!

For example, China's Opium War is not called Opium War in the West, but is called " Business War ", which means: they come to China to do business, and China is unwilling to open up the market and do business, so they have to force the Chinese to open up the market through war. It does not mention that the goods they do business are "opium". This is what Hong Kong people are like. Hong Kong people don't know that there is an Opium War, they only know that there is a "business war". They are so shameless!

Western historians dare to fake the history of modern times, let alone the history of the West that is farther away! It is no wonder that the black slave trade has been faked. They have always been like this and have never changed. Even historical experts have questioned the so-called " Renaissance " in the West, which is also fake, because there are no relevant unearthed cultural relics to prove it. Like American lunar landing , it is also very likely to be fake. Isn’t the history of anti-fascism in World War II already turned into a fascist and was it defeated by the United States? Is the United States playing a key role? Even conquering Berlin is almost becoming a US military!