Comrade Jiang Zemin passed away, and Hu Xijin immediately published a condolence article. What is surprising is his name to the deceased. As a 96-year-old former national leader, is Hu Xijin really suitable for this title?
I am not a fan of Hu Xijin and I did not follow him. I saw it on the recommended page of the system. I felt it was inappropriate at the time and replied to Hu Xijin as soon as possible. Later, I found out that he had changed, so I didn't pay attention to it anymore. With me, this matter was over. What I can't understand is that many articles suddenly appeared today to defend Hu Xijin's whitewashing. It is a kind name, nothing wrong with it. What logic is this? It's a serious moment, a global concern. The former national leader passed away and was an elderly 96-year-old, how could he use this title of unserious, unofficial, and disrespectful? As a senior media person, doesn’t Hu Xijin understand?
Some people also say that when Comrade Deng Xiaoping was alive, didn’t someone call him Comrade Xiaoping? But have you ever seen someone call him old when he died? Let me ask again, did Comrade Jiang Zemin also call him this when he was alive? Is it wrong that I am wrong, why are you trying to make a forcibly defend me? Originally, Hu Xijin had to correct this matter, but some people just insisted on whitewashing and accusing us of exaggerating. Is this exaggerating? Is it wrong to give the most basic respect to a deceased? How to divide the name when you need to be serious, you must be serious when you should be serious, right?
