For the dignity of a national leader, its status is not determined by one's own quality, but by the national power.
So in a system, leaders with strong national strength often gain the greatest respect and become the best destination.
But there are exceptions to this, that is, the three giants in the period of the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Many people don’t understand why the three giants that disintegrated the Soviet Union ended up being “ungood”? You may not have imagined it.
The disintegration of the three giants in the Soviet Union actually refers to the leaders of the three most powerful and powerful countries during the Soviet era.
One is Yeltsin of Russian , one is Ukrainian Kravchuk , and the other is Belarusian Shushkevich .
Why do you say that these are the Big Three? One is because the three countries are all Slavs , which is the core country of the Soviet Union;
, which is actually because the three countries have nuclear weapons , which has the strongest military and economic strength.
So in the Soviet Union, these three people had a very status and authority, and even Gorbachev had to give face.
So in the end it was these three who signed the Treaty of Disintegration of the Soviet Union together, which eventually led to Gorbachev's powerlessness and eventually moving towards the understanding.
So the three giants have become the founding fathers of the new country of the Three Kingdoms. Just looking at this, you can actually see it.
The three of them are all great men, extremely strong, and will eventually become famous people in history.
But in the end, the three of them ended up not doing well. Yeltsin has been despised so far, and both Krafchuk and Shushkevich were driven off the stage. They were basically poor and sick in their later years, and they are still miserable.
So many people don’t understand why the three giants in the disintegration of the Soviet Union are “bad”?
actually has only one fundamental reason, that is, "there is no way to govern the country."
Although the three giants led the country to strengthen independence, they are all representatives of the Western free market economy and have been fooled by the West.
So after independence, he took power and completely abandoned everything from the Soviet Union.
directly started large-scale reform and marketization, and the final result was internal and external difficulties.
Russia almost disintegrated again. If it weren't for the timely rescue of Putin and , Yeltsin might have been kicked out of office and despised.
, and Krafchuk changed Ukraine into a capital paradise, with more than 800 capital-controlled countries in all sizes, and the country is completely finished.
, and Shushkevich brought chaos and disaster to Belarus, and was kicked off the power in two years.
If Lukashenko had not corrected it in time and continued the Soviet route, I don’t know how miserable Belarus is now.
So in the end, the three giants were still because of their incompetence and their fate was not good.
Welcome to follow [Behind the Historical Truth], and update you with fresh historical information every day and see everything in the world without going out!
References: "Modern and Contemporary History of the World".
