1, about Nobel Prize
recently draws, everyone is discussing Nobel Prize every day, civilization science should have something to say about this.
In my recently translated book "Great Civilization", I have said a few more words about IQ, which roughly means that IQ is the embodiment of civilization, and from a group perspective, IQ is civilization . This is a little different from individual IQ, but they are closely related. For example, the highest human IQ 4,000 years ago was in the Nile basin, and the highest group IQ 2,500 years ago was in the Ancient Greek . Today, the highest IQ is in the United States and other award-winning countries.
I have seen from a comprehensive Nobel Prize animation statistics published by the Phoenix TV website over the years that the winning of the Nobel Prize is closely related to the development of civilization. The rules are very obvious!
First of all, the Nobel Prizes are mostly scattered in areas related to Indo-Europeans, countries with high modernization levels, and areas with huge land resources and huge population resources. But poor and backward countries are almost blank areas. Therefore, today's world is roughly guided by the Indo-Europeans, and even the Nobel Prize is a weather vane. The setting of the Nobel Prize began in the late 19th century. The Nobel Prize did not start 10,000 years ago, nor did it start 200 years ago, but the execution of wills began in 1895, and the first session began in 1902? Therefore, the Nobel Prize statistics reflect the transformation of world science and civilization in the past 120 years.
Entering the 20th century, the British limelight has passed, but the European sector is rising and the East Asian sector is sinking into the abyss. This is the starting point of the Nobel Prize. At the same time, we also believe that the Nobel Prize is a kind of "Western values" and is also the value of today's world. It is natural for anyone with higher IQ to guide the world's values.
The first Nobel Prize winners are most of France and Germany, and Britain, the Netherlands, Russia and Switzerland are the second echelons. The statistics are too fast. I don’t seem to see a country outside of Europe? There is an India! And India has repeatedly represented Asia on the list! India was a British colony at that time. But the United States has not yet emerged. This is the case as of 1906. But it appeared in the United States in 1907!
The top countries did not change much by 1910, but Germany surpassed France, Britain continued to be third, and the United States ranked tenth. India is still the only country outside Europe and the United States (the most populous British colonial country in the world). This is the result of 1915. It seems that somewhere have you seen Israel be on the top 15 once, but the State of Israel did not exist at that time?
By 1925, Germany began to lead far ahead, at its peak. It seems that after the battle of , , Germany was not crippled. This reminded me of the changes from the Soviet Union to Russia, and the West learned a lesson and was determined to completely crippled strategy. The United States rose to 7. Canada appeared in 15th place, indicating that North America began to rise after World War I, and a large number of European immigrants entered North America, such as the injection of the torrent of civilization. Russia is still on the list (with Europe, the country's territory is the first).
Ten years later, the United States continued to catch up to fourth place, but Germany is probably still the first, the Soviet Union's position has not changed, and India is on the list again.
World War II ended, and there was still no major change. Germany is still the first, the United States is second, and India is still on the list. The top 15 countries are all wealthy and developed countries in Europe because scientific research requires financial support.
fundamental changes occurred in 1955, and the United States ranked first and surpassed Germany. Britain was third, and France began to decline sharply. India is gone, and the rest are all wealthy countries in Europe. At this time, the Soviet Union and the United States became the two dominants in the world.
The United States began to lead the way in the 1960s, and the peak period of the United States came. Canada is on the list again. The countries in the second echelon are Germany, Britain and France.
By the end of the 20th century, the United States had abandoned the entire world, surpassed the world and stood out.
The more obvious change that has entered the 21st century is that Canada has begun to rank high and Japan has also appeared at the forefront. Russia still maintains its ranking. Japan has entered ninth place in 2015 and ranked seventh two years later. 1, about Nobel Prize recently draws, everyone is discussing Nobel Prize every day, civilization science should have something to say about this. In my recently translated book "Great Civilization", I have said a few more words about IQ, which roughly means that IQ is the embodiment of civilization, and from a group perspective, IQ is civilization . This is a little different from individual IQ, but they are closely related. For example, the highest human IQ 4,000 years ago was in the Nile basin, and the highest group IQ 2,500 years ago was in the Ancient Greek . Today, the highest IQ is in the United States and other award-winning countries. I have seen from a comprehensive Nobel Prize animation statistics published by the Phoenix TV website over the years that the winning of the Nobel Prize is closely related to the development of civilization. The rules are very obvious!
First of all, the Nobel Prizes are mostly scattered in areas related to Indo-Europeans, countries with high modernization levels, and areas with huge land resources and huge population resources. But poor and backward countries are almost blank areas. Therefore, today's world is roughly guided by the Indo-Europeans, and even the Nobel Prize is a weather vane. The setting of the Nobel Prize began in the late 19th century. The Nobel Prize did not start 10,000 years ago, nor did it start 200 years ago, but the execution of wills began in 1895, and the first session began in 1902? Therefore, the Nobel Prize statistics reflect the transformation of world science and civilization in the past 120 years.
Entering the 20th century, the British limelight has passed, but the European sector is rising and the East Asian sector is sinking into the abyss. This is the starting point of the Nobel Prize. At the same time, we also believe that the Nobel Prize is a kind of "Western values" and is also the value of today's world. It is natural for anyone with higher IQ to guide the world's values.
The first Nobel Prize winners are most of France and Germany, and Britain, the Netherlands, Russia and Switzerland are the second echelons. The statistics are too fast. I don’t seem to see a country outside of Europe? There is an India! And India has repeatedly represented Asia on the list! India was a British colony at that time. But the United States has not yet emerged. This is the case as of 1906. But it appeared in the United States in 1907!
The top countries did not change much by 1910, but Germany surpassed France, Britain continued to be third, and the United States ranked tenth. India is still the only country outside Europe and the United States (the most populous British colonial country in the world). This is the result of 1915. It seems that somewhere have you seen Israel be on the top 15 once, but the State of Israel did not exist at that time?
By 1925, Germany began to lead far ahead, at its peak. It seems that after the battle of , , Germany was not crippled. This reminded me of the changes from the Soviet Union to Russia, and the West learned a lesson and was determined to completely crippled strategy. The United States rose to 7. Canada appeared in 15th place, indicating that North America began to rise after World War I, and a large number of European immigrants entered North America, such as the injection of the torrent of civilization. Russia is still on the list (with Europe, the country's territory is the first).
Ten years later, the United States continued to catch up to fourth place, but Germany is probably still the first, the Soviet Union's position has not changed, and India is on the list again.
World War II ended, and there was still no major change. Germany is still the first, the United States is second, and India is still on the list. The top 15 countries are all wealthy and developed countries in Europe because scientific research requires financial support.
fundamental changes occurred in 1955, and the United States ranked first and surpassed Germany. Britain was third, and France began to decline sharply. India is gone, and the rest are all wealthy countries in Europe. At this time, the Soviet Union and the United States became the two dominants in the world.
The United States began to lead the way in the 1960s, and the peak period of the United States came. Canada is on the list again. The countries in the second echelon are Germany, Britain and France.
By the end of the 20th century, the United States had abandoned the entire world, surpassed the world and stood out.
The more obvious change that has entered the 21st century is that Canada has begun to rank high and Japan has also appeared at the forefront. Russia still maintains its ranking. Japan has entered ninth place in 2015 and ranked seventh two years later.(Statistics as of 2018) There is a certain time difference between the Nobel Prize and the level of civilization I have mastered, which is the lag. This time difference is about 10 years.
China has not been on the top 15! Therefore, China cannot be a "developed country" that Americans maliciously advocate. One day, everyone saw that China was on the list, especially in the top ten. China has the hope of becoming a developed country, and it is still early. What surprised me was that the Soviet Union or Russia always maintained a certain position range. Some people say that the Nobel Prize is not important. Of course, the sun still rises every day without the Nobel Prize, but the Nobel Prize in a sense standardizes the group intelligence, regional wealth, and the level of modern civilization in a region.
The following figure is the correlation between global per capita consumption of chocolate and the Nobel Prize. In fact, it explains the relationship between wealthy and developed countries and the Nobel Prize, because chocolate is actually a luxury product, and it is also a consumer product for Indo-Europeans. China has the largest population in the world today, but ranks the lowest consumption, so this is the real reality.
(hahahahahaha......)
2, Genius and IQ
Nobel Prize more reflects the group IQ, that is, the level of civilization. In fact, there are certain conditions for the emergence of individual geniuses. If a child with a very high biological genetic IQ lived with werewolf since childhood, he would not be able to become a talent. Therefore, individuals must reach the top civilization highland. If you can’t choose a country, you can choose a region. For example, the concentration of top scholars in China since the Ming and Qing dynasties has been in the south or coastal areas, such as Jiangsu and Zhejiang, and the Yangtze River Delta is relatively concentrated. Because here is rich, then Matthew effect . Since , the northern civilization has gradually declined since of the Song Dynasty. This is actually a general trend of civilization. From a data perspective, the turning point of view of Chinese civilization's north-south game occurred during the Tang and Song dynasties. It is likely to be related to the development of ship technology in East Asia, and of course it is also related to the transfer of capital, and the core of talent has been transferred from the northwest to the coast.
Many people ask, why do some Chinese people easily win the Nobel Prize when they come to the United States? The reason is as above. "Genius" is not all the result of one's own efforts. Genius needs geopolitical support, but in fact it is the level of cultivation of civilization. A low-civilized area is likely to not be able to cultivate "geniuses", which is very complicated to say.
In the last century, people summarized that the emergence of genius must be megacities or port cities with sufficient information exchange. In the last century, my family had several cities to choose from, such as Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Wuhan. I flatly refused to retreat to Wuhan and would not go back to death if I was beaten to death. This metropolis in Beijing attracted me to live here. I can't say whether civilization science was cultivated in Beijing, but if there is a city like Beijing, it is very likely that civilization science was not created by me. The probability of a Wuhan person creating civilization is very small, and only scholars under the imperial city have the greatest probability. Su San is not smart, but he is smart. A stupid person can take advantage of the situation and move in the wind. Pigs can fly in the air vent.
If you are a tiger mom with clear goals, if you want your children to become, how old they are, and what kind of talent they are, you must first pay attention to choosing the city they grow up and live in, what important position they have in those places around the world, whether they are first-class or second-rate, which will determine their future to a certain extent. Of course, a happy life does not have to be in a megacity, but there is definitely a certainty of what it is. Of course, it also depends on what disciplines are. This is the case for disciplines that require information or collaboration, but it does not seem that this is the case for literature that requires originality. In addition, there are exceptions for a university to provoke a city, such as Oxford, , Yale , and Israelis. Especially in today's Internet era, perhaps this rule of achievement is about to be broken? People who are hang on the Internet every day and know many foreign languages may be equivalent to living in a "mega city".
My research is "big civilization", but in fact these topics belong to micro civilization, but there is a connection between micro and macro.From a research perspective, there is no need to distinguish between microscopic and macroscopic. For example, recently I have noticed the field of film and television creation, which is actually related to the level of macro civilization. I found that relatively backward countries like China also lack skills in their film and television works. For example, their film and television works generally lack "thoughts", which not only makes general literary works only describe states, but do not convey clear ideological values. As for many Chinese films, the ending of the film is open, as if the wound is not sutured. The sealing stitching of the movie is , which requires ideological skills. But even if you watch Korean movies, their "closure" is extremely beautiful, because South Korea is a developed country! Although I really don’t like South Korea, that’s the objective reality.
The ending of Japanese movies is also very beautiful, but the sealing skills in recent years are not as good as South Korea, which reflects that Japan's national strength has begun to decline. These phenomena can be seen from the microscope. This is the embodiment of group IQ, or civilized level. This is the resonance effect of civilization .
The level of civilization of a country is directly related to the level of its intellectuals. This involves not only intellectuals in science and engineering, but also humanistic intellectuals; in other words, the level of civilization directly involves the complexity and depth of the thinking mode of intellectuals in a country. Chinese film and television not only lack beautiful "sealing" and "ligation" surgery, but also extremely superficial and naive. In fact, it is a manifestation of the general superficial and naive thoughts of Chinese humanistic intellectuals, and thus also reflected in film and television programs. With this kind of "sewing" technology at the end of film and television, the most beautiful one is the European country. Americans are not unable to "sew" but are unwilling to spend their efforts to "sew" beauty, because film and television is an entertainment in other countries, as long as it meets the entertainment level of ordinary people, it is not wasted at all. The United States is a vulgar pragmatist country. But it is obvious that in China, the screenwriter and director are unable to "stitch" - this matter has nothing to do with creative freedom, it is the ideological skills themselves, it is a pure technical job, this technology comes from the level of civilization and the group intelligence, and comes from civilization, specifically, modern civilization.
China's modern civilization level can be simply looked at the Nobel Prize indicators. Judging from the above six levels, China now belongs to the fourth echelon, two levels away from the United States. But I am full of hope for China. China's first goal is to catch up with Russia or Eastern Europe. I don't think it's too far.
From a research perspective, there is no need to distinguish between microscopic and macroscopic. For example, recently I have noticed the field of film and television creation, which is actually related to the level of macro civilization. I found that relatively backward countries like China also lack skills in their film and television works. For example, their film and television works generally lack "thoughts", which not only makes general literary works only describe states, but do not convey clear ideological values. As for many Chinese films, the ending of the film is open, as if the wound is not sutured. The sealing stitching of the movie is , which requires ideological skills. But even if you watch Korean movies, their "closure" is extremely beautiful, because South Korea is a developed country! Although I really don’t like South Korea, that’s the objective reality.The ending of Japanese movies is also very beautiful, but the sealing skills in recent years are not as good as South Korea, which reflects that Japan's national strength has begun to decline. These phenomena can be seen from the microscope. This is the embodiment of group IQ, or civilized level. This is the resonance effect of civilization .
The level of civilization of a country is directly related to the level of its intellectuals. This involves not only intellectuals in science and engineering, but also humanistic intellectuals; in other words, the level of civilization directly involves the complexity and depth of the thinking mode of intellectuals in a country. Chinese film and television not only lack beautiful "sealing" and "ligation" surgery, but also extremely superficial and naive. In fact, it is a manifestation of the general superficial and naive thoughts of Chinese humanistic intellectuals, and thus also reflected in film and television programs. With this kind of "sewing" technology at the end of film and television, the most beautiful one is the European country. Americans are not unable to "sew" but are unwilling to spend their efforts to "sew" beauty, because film and television is an entertainment in other countries, as long as it meets the entertainment level of ordinary people, it is not wasted at all. The United States is a vulgar pragmatist country. But it is obvious that in China, the screenwriter and director are unable to "stitch" - this matter has nothing to do with creative freedom, it is the ideological skills themselves, it is a pure technical job, this technology comes from the level of civilization and the group intelligence, and comes from civilization, specifically, modern civilization.
China's modern civilization level can be simply looked at the Nobel Prize indicators. Judging from the above six levels, China now belongs to the fourth echelon, two levels away from the United States. But I am full of hope for China. China's first goal is to catch up with Russia or Eastern Europe. I don't think it's too far.
