Friends who follow the account and video of Crow B station may still have an impression. During the 70th anniversary of the Resistance and Aid Korea in 2020, we invited Mr. Gao Geli, a famous military history research scholar and author of the long documentary literature "The Vic

Hello everyone, I am a crow.

Friends who follow Crow B station account and video may still have an impression. During the 2020 commemoration of the 470th anniversary of Resisting U.S. aggression and aiding Korea, we invited the famous military history scholar and long documentary literature "The Vicissitudes of the Heart - From the 60th Army of the Kuomintang to the 50th Army of the Communist Party" ( Sichuan People's Publishing House 2017 reprint), the author of Gao Geli , and presented many wonderful content to everyone.

Teacher Gao Geli noticed a very interesting issue after the show.

He said that he found that in the video, there were several barrages of "suddenly enlightened and enlightened" .

"This is strange, !"

Because, "What I talk about is the basic historical fact of the Chinese revolution; the reason I talk about is the basic principle of the materialist view of history" .

But why are the audience so unfamiliar with ?

further observed and found that some barrage repeatedly proposed that Teacher Gao Geli "talk more about history textbooks that do not have" .

This is even more strange!

Because "the Education Law stipulates that Marxism is the guiding ideology of our educational work. The materialist view of history is the only correct view of history , which is what Lenin said."

Then there are four possibilities: listening to the class is distracted, teaching is boring, textbooks are abstract, and textbooks are missing.

Teacher Gao Geli found the history textbook of the People's Education Press in 2007 and found that it was really "the most impossible" "the textbook is missing" !

Teacher Gao Geli summarized the typical missing that is very harmful into missing "Five Histories and One View" :

. The basic historical fact that shows the social roots of the agrarian revolution

. The basic historical fact that shows the Red Army b1. The basic historical fact that the Red Army b1. The basic historical fact that the endogenous driving force for the development of the counter-trend

. The institutional roots of the Kuomintang's loss of troops in the war of resistance Basic historical facts

4, basic historical facts that show the source of the liberation war's destruction of combat effectiveness

5, important historical facts that reveal the hypocritical nature of the "United Nations Army"

6, correct explanation of the materialist view of history

Teacher Gao Geli keenly discovered the historical education problem of the history textbooks missing "Five Histories and One View" to open the door to thieves. If this series of problems is not solved seriously as soon as possible, we will lose the right to interpret the history of the Chinese revolution, jeopardize the historical education of several generations, and ultimately shake the historical foundation of the new China.

Today I bring you the first lecture of : The lack of history textbooks to show the basic historical facts of the social roots of the agrarian revolution .

1

007 People's Education Edition History Textbook Compulsory 1 Unit 4 Lesson 15 is titled: "Ten Years of Confrontation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party" .

The scope of this lesson is 927.8.1-1937.7.7.

And this history was usually called "Agrarian Revolutionary War Period" or "Second Civil Revolutionary War Period" .

It is not difficult to see that the naming in the 07 People's Education Press textbook is "derevolutionary".

Then we might as well see why it was originally called the Agrarian Revolution War Period. This is closely related to the basic characteristics of in China at that time .

The social nature of old China , is a semi-colonial semi-feudal society. The agricultural population in old China accounted for the vast majority. The main contradictions of in old China were , one was the contradiction between imperialism and the Chinese nation, and the other was the contradiction between feudal landlord class and the peasant masses. The nature and mission of the Chinese revolution is an anti-imperialist and anti-feudal national democratic revolution .

According to historical materials such as the Wuhan government's investigation in 1927, farmers who are completely landless account for 55% of the agricultural population, and landlords and rich peasants occupy 68% of the land.

senior Kuomintang general Chen Cheng said this: "Eighty or ninety percent of the Chinese population are farmers, and 7 or eighty percent of these 80% of the farmers are tenant farmers."

In other words, most farmers have no land at all. In this way, social contradictions are reflected not only in the "poverty" of the vast majority of farmers, but more importantly, the two nooses that are tied to poor farmers: one is high land rent and the other is usury.

First talk about land rent exploitation .

Farmers who do not have land must rent the landlord's land to plant it, and they must pay the landlord's rent. This land rent usually has three forms: labor rent, physical rent, and monetary rent.

, which is mainly , physical rent . There are six forms of physical land rent: fixed-rental system, pre-rental system, field rent system, sub-rental system, and bundled rental system.

is mainly for customized . What is a custom-rental system? Sichuan-Kang District calls it "iron-plate rent", which means that no matter it is a good year, a bad year or a disaster year, you must pay rent to the landlords according to a certain amount of harvest (normal year). And how much is this rent? Generally, it is about 60% of the harvest.

Phoenix Big Vision has an episode of the program "The Big Landlord Liu Wencai", which interviewed a tenant who once Liu Wencai, and asked him how much rent a mu of land would pay. He replied that one mu of land would be scattered and seven or eight millets, and one stone would be paid for rent.

, the land leasing rate is close to 60% .

asked again, "Is this land rent high?" Answer: "Not high or not."

What does this mean?

first, This land rent is not low . The "Interim Regulations on Tenancy" issued by the Kuomintang government in 1932 clearly stipulates that the maximum limit for rent payment shall not exceed 375% of the harvest of the genuine product in that year, while Liu Wencai's land lease rate is close to 60%. Can this be called "not high"?

Second, with such a high land rent rate, farmers still say "not high", which can only show that has more land rent than this. I went to , and there are many more extreme examples than this.

For example, Jiang Menglin , who was once the principal of Peking University , recorded such an experience in his autobiography "The West Tide and the New Trend".

said that once he went to Guangzhou, he met Mr. Sun Yat-sen's eldest son Sun Ke (No. Zhesheng) , and then he talked about:

Brother Zhesheng, your old man, Mr. Zhongshan, advocates that plunderers have their own land, but the land system in Zhongshan County is the worst. The general and normal method is the so-called 55, which means that the landlords get five, and the tenant farmers get five; later it was gradually changed to 7, and the landlords get seventy percent, and the tenant farmers get threety percent; even 19, that is, the landlords get ninety percent, and the tenant farmers get one hundred percent. Where does farmers live hard?

The land lease rate can even reach 19, is farmers still a way out?

Then let’s talk about ’s second noose - usury .

Why do farmers borrow money? is a natural disaster, a man-made disaster, a high land rent, and a heavy tax on . There were many types of harsh and miscellaneous taxes at that time. There were 147 types of harsh and miscellaneous taxes in Jiangsu, 73 types of harsh and miscellaneous taxes in Zhejiang, 61 types of harsh and miscellaneous taxes in Hubei and Jiangxi, and was pre-collected in the fifties and sixties and even the eighties and nineties of the Republic of China.

In this way, some farmers can't survive and can only borrow usury.

There are also many types of usury, including monetary usury and physical usury.

Ultimate loan interest is generally 3 or 5, which means borrowing 100 kilograms of grain, and by the second year, 130 kilograms to 150 kilograms of .Due to the different seasons, the most common ones are spring 3, summer 1, autumn 2, and winter 5. There are also those who pay double interest, which is even higher.

The forms of usury are diverse, usually beneficial to profit, buying green seedlings, ex-profit loans, renting profits, etc.

here two are mentioned, the first one is profit-winning .

means that you borrowed 100 kilograms of millet in the first year, and you will have to pay back 130 kilograms to 150 kilograms in a year, and you will have to pay back 286 kilograms to 506 kilograms in four years!

What should farmers do if they can’t afford it?

Sell houses and land, even children and daughters, beg for a foreign land.

The second one is Disclaimer , which is also very amazing.

means that you borrow 100 kilograms of grain, he will only give you 70 kilograms, and he will deduct the remaining 30 kilograms as interest. When it expires, you have to pay him 100 pounds.

There are many names for usury.

2

Then feudal landlords, which are exploited with land rent as the core, are huge and multifaceted:

First, farmers have no enthusiasm for production .

Second, it caused a large number of farmers to go bankrupt and land merger .

Third, what should farmers do if they lose land? flees to famine and forms a large number of refugees. If there are more refugees, farmers' uprising broke out, causing social unrest .

Fourth, hinders industrial investment . Because the land rent rate is too high, landlords don’t invest in industries if they have money, buy land and rent it. It is much more cost-effective to collect land rent than to run a factory.

Then back to Jiang Menglin asked Sun Ke’s question, why did the Kuomintang regime not realize the political proposition of average land rights proposed by Mr. Sun Yat-sen?

This is not because of the incompetence of the Kuomintang officials.

but Under the system back then, they could not play a role .

Here are two examples, which are also recorded in Jiang Menglin's autobiography.

is the first. After the National Army occupied Hangzhou in 1929, it used government power to promote the second-five reduction of rent , which means minus 25% of the original rent.

As a result, these landlords bribed professional killers and assassinated a leader who promoted the second-five rent reduction Shen Xuanlu .

The second example is Chen Guofu 's "land reform" . One year, Chen Guofu talked to Jiang Menglin in Nanjing that he strongly advocated taking all the land in Nanjing to the government and then carrying out land reform . When the meeting was held, Chen Guofu proposed the plan, and it was about that could not continue to be implemented.

At first he didn't understand why, but later he found out that the bureaucrats and powerful figures in Nanjing were all big landlords, and they all wanted to maintain this feudal land exploitation system.

Jiang Menglin also told him, Mr. Guofu, the land in Nanjing is made of tiger skin. You have to use strength to knock down the tiger and peel off his skin. You discuss with tigers how to skin the tiger, which is not something that can’t be done with .

The other Kuomintang cannot carry out the agrarian revolution, and the Communist Party will carry out the arbitrary revolution. Then the Kuomintang will carry out the arbitrary revolution, and the Kuomintang will carry out the forceful suppression. This is why the so-called "confrontation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party" has been called for a decade.

Its root is from the land revolution.

Then, looking back at the history textbook of the People's Education Press in 2007, its display of the causes of the land revolution is basically that stays at the saying that the average land rights is .

Lesson 15 is the first one to derevolutionize , which is changed to "Ten Years of Confrontation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party"; in 2019, the history textbook of the People's Education Press was changed to "The Rule of the Nanjing National Government and the Communist Party of China's Opening-up Revolutionary Road".

However, neither version of mentioned the reason for the land revolution, which is the historical fact that the feudal land system cruelly squeezed farmers and hindered the development of productivity . The description of "abolition of feudal exploitation" in the textbook is only in action, not in the analysis of social roots.

Where can these kids understand in class?

read the key points of this lesson, but did not talk about the reasons for the land revolution; the "data playback" after

quotes a piece of historical document, what does it give people? and "The King of Chuang came and did not pay food" seem to be no different from .

In fact, the agrarian revolution carried out by the Communist Party of China is aiming to eliminate the exploitation system with and strive toward socialism and communism. And the average land rights are running towards capitalism , and are still based on private ownership .

3

So after the textbooks blurred the basic historical fact of the land exploitation system, why did I say it " opens the door to thieves "?

The most obvious consequence is that a whole generation of young people, even more than one generation, does not know where the "old" of the old society is, and does not understand where the "new" of the new China is . After watching some of my lecture videos, these young people felt that (relevant knowledge) were "unheard of".

Then the consequences of , a netizen told me this sentence:

"If you don't explain these history clearly, the enemy will make up a history for you."

After you give this history yourself, the enemy, anti-communist and anti-China forces will come up to you to set the rhythm and lead in another direction.

First of all, I will seize the principle of "not paying back the rent, not paying off the debt", and equate it with to peasant uprisings such as "the king of corruption comes and does not pay the grain", " is both rich and poor, etc. ". This equal poverty (rich)ism is also the same.

regards the land revolution as, seems to be "destroying contracts" . Next, use this "contract spirit" to lead the rhythm, and you are confused about the source of land, land concentration, and the character of landlords, and cover up the essential problem of land rent exploitation and worry about those secondary issues.

(In the eyes of some people, Huang Shiren is "more unjust than Dou E")

further sets the rhythm, which is to use the "contract spirit" to denies the legitimacy of fighting against local tyrants and sharing land and a land revolution .

In the end, completely denies the necessity and necessity of the land revolution .

For example, the novel "Soft Buried", the thought of overturning the case for Liu Wencai, and the professor who debated with me was published a monograph under the funding of Ford Foundation , which completely negated the land revolution.

This is the consequence of opening the door to thieves .

In terms of the severity of the consequences, such hidden thunder harm is even worse than "problem textbook illustrations".

(The video of this lecture by Teacher Gao Geli has been online on B station. Interested friends can move to Bilibili Crow Captain Official Account)