However, British and American politicians took the opportunity to make nonsense on the Hong Kong issue and interfere in my country's internal affairs. On June 30, U.S. Secretary of State Blinken issued a statement saying that Hong Kong’s democracy and freedoms had been undermined

July 1 is the 25th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to China. However, British and American politicians took the opportunity to make nonsense on the Hong Kong issue and interfere in my country's internal affairs. On June 30, US Secretary of State Blinken issued a statement saying that Hong Kong's democracy and freedom had been destroyed; on July 1, British Prime Minister Johnson claimed that the UK would not abandon Hong Kong and would do its best to make the Chinese government "fulfill its commitments" "; On the same day, British Foreign Secretary stated that the UK has historical responsibilities to the residents of Hong Kong under the "Sino-British Joint Declaration". Hong Kong was once a fortress of freedom and a model of prosperity. The whole world is paying attention to China's actions.

At the end of the Qing Dynasty, China and Britain signed the "Nanjing Treaty" and "Beijing Treaty", and Hong Kong fell under the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom. On December 19, 1984, China and the United Kingdom jointly issued the "Sino-British Joint Declaration". The main contents are: (1) British Government Statement: The British Government returned Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China on July 1, 1997; ( 2) The Chinese government and the British government declare: During the transition period from the effective date of this joint statement to July 1, 1997, the British government is responsible for the administrative management of Hong Kong in order to maintain and maintain Hong Kong's economic prosperity and society. Stablize. To sum up, on and after July 1, 1997, the UK did not have any rights or obligations in Hong Kong. The British Foreign Secretary’s statement that “the UK has historical responsibilities towards Hong Kong residents” has no legal basis. Hong Kong is part of China, and the Hong Kong issue is China's internal affairs and cannot be questioned.

In addition to the aforementioned "Sino-British Joint Declaration", Hong Kong's affiliation to the Chinese central government also has sufficient domestic legal basis. From the provisions of my country's Constitution, it can be clearly seen that special administrative regions are local administrative regions at the same level as provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, and are all under the jurisdiction of the central government. As Article 59 of the Constitution stipulates, the National People's Congress is composed of representatives elected by provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government, special administrative regions and the military. Article 12 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as the "Basic Law") stipulates that the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is directly under the Central People's Government.

However, since the return of Hong Kong, Western politicians and anti-China forces with ulterior motives have taken advantage of the institutional differences between Hong Kong and the mainland to undermine the relationship between the mainland and Hong Kong. The opposition forces in Hong Kong they cultivated have long been cooperating internally and externally, distorting the interpretation of " one country, two systems " and the Basic Law. weaken the national identity of Hong Kong compatriots. Since 2003, we have opposed Article 23 of the Basic Law, which prohibits any acts of treason, secession, sedition, subversion of the Central People's Government and theft of state secrets, and prohibits foreign political organizations or groups from conducting political activities in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Legislation prohibiting political organizations or groups in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or groups. In 2012, they opposed the implementation of the "National Education Section". In 2014, they continued the 79-day illegal "Occupy Central" and "Amendment Before the outbreak of the "Corruption", unrest factors in Hong Kong society already existed and were rising in waves.

As for the extradition bill mentioned in Blinken's statement, it was the trigger that forced the Chinese central government to enact the "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region National Security Law" to prevent the situation from getting out of control. In June 2019, the "revision disturbance" triggered by opposition to the amendment of the "Fugitive Offenders Ordinance" spread rapidly in Hong Kong and quickly evolved into a riot that caused chaos and harm to Hong Kong. During this riot, the West set up NGO branches in Hong Kong with the "goals" of "social investigation" and "human rights protection" and used these branches as outposts for Western anti-China forces to disrupt and cause trouble in Hong Kong. The "white gloves" of other countries to interfere in Hong Kong affairs and undermine "one country, two systems". Western non-governmental organizations such as the "National Endowment for Democracy", "American Institute for Democracy in International Affairs", " International Republican Institute ", "Human Rights Watch", "Freedom House", and "Amnesty International" may provide financial support or publish so-called " "Observation Report" openly supports the rioters and "Hong Kong independence" remarks, slanders the Hong Kong SAR government's law-based governance, and discredits "one country, two systems".

"Hong Kong is Chinese territory, and Hong Kong issues are China's internal affairs" has sufficient basis in domestic law and international law .If entities in the United States and the United Kingdom continue to support acts of chaos in Hong Kong, they will directly violate the basic principle of "non-interference in internal affairs" of international law and constitute an internationally illegal act. Our country can fully impose severe sanctions on the relevant corpses in accordance with the "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region National Security Law" and other laws to serve as a warning to others.