has been on the hot searched "Yang Mi Internet Tort Liability Dispute" several times. Yang Mi won the case in the first instance. The defendant Zhang needs to apologize on the top of Weibo for 15 consecutive days and pay 87,000 yuan for mental damage.
I hope the news this time is true, after all, the news comes from the enterprise search and Tianyancha. In fact, this case has dragged on for a long time. As early as 2019, Yang Mi's fans once celebrated their victory on Weibo. However, the court came out to refute the rumors: At that time, there was no judgment and no judgment.
Now, Yang Mi’s fans are celebrating on the Internet, congratulating his idol for winning the lawsuit. In the words, it seems that after Yang Mi wins the lawsuit, the black spots on her body can be completely whitened.
Actually, Yang Mi is still far away from washing white. She won the case, but it seemed that the part that won the case was only the part of the right of reputation, and the court also rejected some of Yang Mifang's claims.
Regarding the right of reputation, it is normal for Yang Mi to win the lawsuit. The adjectives used by the defendant Zhang to describe Yang Mi on the Internet were very unbearable: words such as "endorsement of disaster star", "buying a water army", "Yang Dianfeng", "cross face", "inferior artist", etc., are not good at all. word.
For example, with the three words "endorsement disaster star", "Yang Dianfeng", and "inferior artist", Zhang will definitely lose the case. The first two words are originally insulting words. No matter what Yang Mi is, using these words to describe her, she can certainly defend her rights.
Do you still remember the case of Li Xiaolu's reputation right? We all know what Li Xiaolu did.But how to describe her? This can't talk nonsense. If some filthy words were used to describe Li Xiaolu's person, she would surely win if she sued, it had nothing to do with what she did.
Therefore, Yang Mi won the case, but it does not mean that she can really clean things up. This is also the reason why the judgments streaming out of the Internet contain the words "reject other litigation requests." Moreover, the trial video of this case can be seen on the China Trial Public Network. There are some things that Yang Mifang, as the plaintiff, did not provide evidence.
