From: NGA - luo52511 I am an indigenous player of Oro TBC. I have always had a fixed guild G group before. Because Wlk has just been open for a week and I am busy during the National Day holiday, I did not catch up with the P1G group in the first week of the guild. Today I went o

From: NGA - luo52511

I am an indigenous player of Oro TBC. I have always had a fixed guild G group before. Because wlk has just been open for a week and I am busy during the National Day, I did not catch up with the P1G group in the first week of the guild. was launched today, originally arranging an appointment with a friend to play H book, but a few real friends said they had joined the G group and called us to play 25 people NAXX together. When I joined the group, I did not say that I scored the G-pass line, but as an old TBC player, I have basic qualities, do not stroke, and completely obey the command of the group leader. When played 3 bosses, some knights from the relatives and friends group began to speak, asking everyone to work hard to play dps, strictly follow the 70% score of G. After playing Ak, you need to score G. The team leader called out a certain relative and friend of his wcl record in Waiwai, and said that he would be given a G according to the requirement of 70% of the careers in the whole process, and no G would be given a G if it was less than 70%. posted wcl records and equipment screenshots, so everyone should pay attention to avoid pitfalls. Just saw Baidu today and reprinted this post. Some details need to be added: 1. The leader did not say anything in the whole process without distinguishing the professional assessment. 2.dps' first ss took 180 blames throughout the whole process. (I looked at it and it should be 89) 3. In the end, it was half G scored by 5 people except for the group leader’s relatives and friends. 4 reminds everyone to leave the group in time when they see the name of this group, the leader ID, and the number YY.


follow-up:

Come on, and go against the poster. WCL address:
cn.classic.warcraftlogs.com/reports/3vWdVZ21LAM9XtqQParty: Warlock: larenyiFirst describe the process: I want to play 25 people and three books on 10.11 night. I have already joined the famous brand G group of Oro server (Mid-Elderly Health Club) (In addition, note: I am in Oro, and the top gold group of the server has a place at any time). Later, my friend said that the group was a member of the group here, and I apologized for a long time to leave before leaving. I went here to fight. I know the leader here, but I am not from his guild. The whole process of hitting is bumpy. My original psychological expectation was to beat 25 people in 3 hours, but in more than 5 hours, I only finished hitting 25 people in NAXX in almost 6 hours. There are various reasons for the process in between. As for whether it has anything to do with those low-dps, I won’t say much, just talk about one boss: Tadius, who only survived the violent attack. See WCL for details. When you finally split the money, the key point is coming. 1. The leader said that the assessment was based on 70%. Someone suggested that my dps were too high, so don’t follow this standard. I agreed with both hands. I wanted to blame it because I mistakenly thought that shackles could improve the WCL data at the beginning (it was proven not possible, but I didn’t know it at the time). Because of this, I died 22 times throughout the whole process (WCL shows that it is actually more than this). Except for the destruction of the group, it is mostly because of OT. If it is a group that deliberately wants to build people, wouldn’t it bring a strong T? Will you be able to py blame or save it? 2. Secondly, the leader soon decided not to use my data as a reference. The second place dk (id: Sword of Garros, also called by collection stone , not the leader guild personnel), and the leader said, "The thief who blamed me, id: Superman thief). The leader said, look at their efforts. As a result, the 5 players related to have never drunk DPS potion throughout the whole process. The leader finally decided to give the 6 unqualified players half gold (including the thief who blamed me). 3. In terms of rules, I was not the first to join the group. The group leader may not have been assessed for the full-professional assessment at the beginning, which should be a fact. But what is the assessment of Wlk? It is now the first week. I think everyone will know whether there will be a "same-professional assessment" in the second week. But this doesn't matter. If you bite this to death, the author can jump up and down for a while.

Summary:

If it was agreed before the group started, it was actually understandable! However, plays games just to be happy. If you make everyone unhappy, you will be happy by yourself. This is not far. ~ After all, many of them are middle-aged people. Not everyone is a high-quality game, but they just don’t take a stroke. It is reasonable to consider half a gold medal at your discretion.