#Top Ten Coaches of the National Server#
The National Server recently announced the second edition of the coach's winning rate. Like the player's winning rate, the coach ranking is also very different from the ranking expected by most players.
Henriksen, Dragicia and Alcad, who have the highest popularity and usage rate, have no surprises in winning rates. Instead, , which was not popular before, has reached the top in an upset.
1. The official winning rate comes from the NetEase Dashen app. This time, it was not divided into multiple ranks to count, and the number of games was not stated.
2. The official winning rate is calculated based on the number of games, and the number of users is not limited. Therefore, there will be some coaches with lower usage rates that have higher winning rates, while some coaches with higher usage rates have lower winning rates. However, regardless of whether the data is accurate or not, the rankings at the beginning of the new season will be unstable and there may be large fluctuations in the later stage. Therefore, at this stage, it is mainly based on reference.
3. Judging from the rankings of each rank, coaches with higher winning rates have basically adopted counterattack tactics recently, and the formation is relatively strict. Players can pay special attention when choosing a coach.
Top 10 coaches in the country server
Official recent winning rate top ten
National server ladder coach weekly winning rate list, which counts the coach rankings of the previous week. Although the winning rate at the beginning of the season is still unstable, it can still be used as a reference when choosing a coach.
is the specific analysis.
NO.10
Coach: Contini
Win rate: 52.91%
Brief analysis: Contini is an atypical pass-by-control coach. His formation is very compact and his defense is pressed very low. The overall style is a propulsion-based style based on defense. The characteristics of
will not cause too much omission in defense, but it is difficult to organize the offense. On the one hand, because his support range is not high, his teammates are closer to the ball holder, which makes it difficult to have a counterattack opportunity; on the other hand, because his formation is tight and he is not scattered, it is difficult to use the width of the court to play the advantage of ball control. If the opponent presses at a high position, it will be very difficult to use the ball to press the ball.
Therefore, in my opinion, although Contini has a high winning rate, its tactical characteristics are not friendly to ordinary players. Even among coaches of the same level, it is a relatively difficult one to get started. Therefore, it is recommended that you choose carefully.
NO.9
Coach: Alcaide
Win rate: 53.02%
Brief analysis: The new version of Alcaide is still there, and the formation has not changed, but the tactical board has been changed a lot. Now he has become a coach who focuses on "ball control game + short pass", and his most prominent feature is that the central defender is relatively high (the defense line is 7). In this way, he is more likely to gain ball rights in dangerous areas and organize attacks, and can also effectively curb opponents' offense through the defense of all players.
However, if the opponent adopts intensive defense tactics, Alcatel will also face obvious difficulties in shooting, and the unified weakness of the high-level defensive coach is that he is afraid of being beaten behind him. Once the offensive mistake or fails to force the opponent to make mistakes at a high position, he will easily lose the ball.
NO.8
Coach: Venturato
Win rate: 53.03%
Brief analysis: Venturato is a regular visitor to the top ten coaches, and his defense is relatively stable. On the one hand, the defensive position is relatively low, and on the other hand, the defensive style is for all players to defend, so the immunity to counterattack is obviously stronger than that of radical coaches.
However, Venturato's formation is not tight and support range is not high. The advantage is that there is enough space for the ball, and the teammates are closer to the holder when receiving the pass; the disadvantage is that the efficiency depends entirely on the grasp of the timing, and the overall pressure rate during counterattack is slow.
Therefore, choosing Venturato as the head coach has very high requirements for the passing ability of midfielders, and forward players must not only have absolute speed, but also have strong individual combat capabilities. If there is no corresponding player reserve, the counterattack efficiency will be greatly reduced.
NO.7
Coach: Golini
win rate: 53.33%
Brief analysis: Although Golini is a long-term counterattack coach, his tactical thinking is not based on defense, but on the frontcourt pressure, which is commonly known as "pressing and fighting". The two pictures below are: the coach with defense level 1 on the left, and the coach with defense level 10 on the right. coaches with low defense level, the central defender is close to his own penalty area; coaches with high defense level, the central defender is close to the midfield.
Gorini's defense level is 9, which means that his team relies on intensive formations and high-level pressing to counterattack in the opponent's half. The kicking method like
obviously has the benefits and risks coexist. The advantage is that the interception position is often in the core hinterland of the opponent, and can form a counterattack starting point in the area closer to the opponent's goal. The threat and efficiency brought by this will inevitably be higher than the counterattack initiated from the backcourt.
However, the disadvantage is that tight pressure cannot be used to both the defense of the wings, and once the opponent crosses the encirclement, a large area of vacuum will be formed behind him. At this time, it is difficult for the defender of his side to form an effective return and interception.
So overall, although Golini's style of playing is very strong, it is also easy to capsize. It may be like a treasure for radical players, but it may not be suitable for robust players.
NO.6
Coach: Guweiya
Win rate: 53.38%
Brief analysis: Guweiya is a pass control coach, and its main feature is that the support range is small, the player should have relatively compact running positions, and the frequency of retracement is higher than that of coaches with a larger support range.
At the same time, Guweiya's defense line is highly oppressed. The ideal effect of this tactic is to make the opponent breathless and wait for an opportunity to find a goal closer to the goal; the least ideal effect is to use intensive defense and high-level pressing, but find that the opponent's shot and attack cannot be curbed at all, and the chance of losing will increase by a factor of a multiplier.
But most of the time this tactic does get more chances of scoring, and since you have chosen this tactic, it determines that your purpose is no longer to not concede the ball, but to ensure that you score one more than your opponent in each game.
NO.5
Coach: Henriksen
win rate: 53.68%
Brief analysis: Henriksen is the coach with the highest winning rate after the national server update. Its main feature is to limit the opponent's offense with high strict position and shrinking formation, and then wait for an opportunity to find counterattack opportunities through short passes.
From the tactical board, Henriksen's formation position is very compact. Readers can refer to the following two pictures. On the left is the station of strict level 1, and on the right is the station of Henriksen (strict level 7/10).
coaches with strict level have obvious advantages in mid-level defense., especially Henriksen's defense level is centered, basically shrinking the defense line to its own half. Once the opponent's offensive players enter the encirclement, they will be restricted by actively rushing. If the interception is completed, they will immediately hit Huanglong's ball behind him, which is an extremely typical counterattack tactic.
But on the other hand, coaches with high strict levels have obvious disadvantages in wing defense. Since the troops are gathered in the center of the court, a large open area will inevitably be left for the opponent on the sidelines. If you don't want to fight Henrikson head-on in the middle, the best way to restrain him should be to choose a coach who attacks on the wing.
NO.4
Coach: Schmitt
Win rate: 54.06%
Brief analysis: Schmitt is the only coach among the top ten coaches who adopts the 4312 formation. His most obvious feature is that he can adjust the offensive area, defensive style and only enclosing area by switching offensive tactics and defensive tactics.
Another feature of it is its high degree of tightness, its formation shrinks relatively tightly, and its forward tilt is low. The advantage is that it is not easy to be penetrated in the middle, but the disadvantage is that it is easy to expose the gap in the flank. Therefore, when you choose him as a coach, you need to carefully consider whether this characteristic is your own playing style.
NO.3
Coach: Casar
Win rate: 54.54%
Brief analysis: Casar is a coach with relatively moderate positions at both ends of offense and defense, and the defense line under the offensive tactics is centered, not a blind way of defending.
First of all, at the defensive level, although Casar's team will not frequently lose their positions because of rashly robbing, the back line moving forward still has a lot of gaps, so they are more afraid of the counterattack tactics that mainly passes long.
followed by the offensive level. Cassal's support range is low, and the contact points that scatter when attacking with the ball will not be particularly far. On the one hand, it will indeed provide more outgoing lines for counterattacks, but on the other hand, it will also affect the speed of counterattacks.
Therefore, from the overall perspective, Cassal is a coach with obvious advantages and disadvantages. Whether it can exert its due power depends more on different players' understanding of tactics and playing styles.
NO.2
Coach: Dragic
Win rate: 54.55%
Brief analysis: Dragic and Henriksen are similar, both have high-level strict data and extremely compact formation.
The difference is that Dragic's establishment is a long pass, and the support range is very high. The distance between teammates and the ball holder is relatively long during attack (as shown in the figure below, the left side supports range 1 and the right side supports range 10).
If the opponent also adopts intensive defense tactics, Dragic will also face obvious difficulties in shooting (teammates are far away). Once the offensive mistake or fails to force the opponent to make mistakes at a high position, it will be easy to lose the ball.
NO.1
Coach: Franklin
Win rate: 55.80%
Brief analysis: Franklin is the coach with the highest winning rate in the new version, and his characteristics are very significant.
First, the support range is extremely high, and there are more players who scatter when welcoming the pass (as shown in the figure below, the left side supports range 1 and the right side supports range 10), which is more conducive to counterattack.
second is extremely strict and the formation and position are very compact. This is obvious for mid-lane defense, but the disadvantage is that the field width cannot be fully utilized, and the space from both sides is easily targeted by the opponent. And although Franklin is the coach who specializes in long passes and counterattacks, his offense is not conservative and his overall defense line is relatively high.The purpose of this tactic is to use a compact and airtight formation to press on the opponent's half to carry out a counterattack. Once you find a good opportunity, nearby players will immediately spread out quickly and take advantage of the situation and hit the opponent's goal closer to the opponent's goal.
And once the ball is lost, all the teams defended by players will immediately return to their own half and reorganize the defense line. The benefit of this is that the defense end is relatively stable and it is not easy to lose the ball.
Therefore, compared with coaches of the same formation, Franklin's overall tactics have no obvious shortcomings in all aspects and outstanding characteristics. It should be one of the best solutions to the 4222 formation at this stage.
