There are two types of experts in the world.
is a kind of real experts who are down-to-earth in learning. Science is the basis, facts are the criterion, and they speak with experimental data. Another type is pseudo-experts who talk nonsense all day long.
There are two types of pseudo-experts. The first type is to understand everything in your heart, but because of personal interests, you tell lies against your conscience, turn black and white, and point a deer as a horse. The second type is that I really don’t understand, and I don’t say I don’t understand, so I have all kinds of weird remarks.
Liang Jianzhang , Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ctrip Group, Population Economist, and Research Professor of Peking University Guanghua School of Management . In June this year, hosted by Phoenix.com and hosted by Phoenix.com Finance, the theme is "The World of Tomorrow", and invited nearly 60 top guests from the political, business and academic circles at home and abroad to interpret the world and China's economic growth path under the major changes.
Professor Liang Jianzhang published a high-level speech
A special dialogue was held on June 16, with the title "Why should we talk about population issues again?" Professor Liang Jianzhang published a high-level speech.
Liang Jianzhang believes that compared with other countries, China has the highest cost of raising children and a large population base, which means China will not be able to solve this problem through immigration. Therefore, China faces unique challenges and opportunities. The Chinese government needs to implement severe measures and invest a lot of fiscal spending to help families raise children in order to reverse the trend of low childbirth.
Phoenix Finance: What do you want to say for those young people who are working hard to find a job?
Liang Jianzhang: Maybe more education can be received. I think this should be a short-term volatility in the job market. Therefore, if you can't find a job in the short term, you can receive more education and training, or even self-training, improve your skills, and then wait for the economy to improve, or get married and have children.
Professor Liang gave two tricks to young people who could not find a job. The first trick is to participate in education and training, and the second trick is to get married and have children. Both
are not adjusted.
Let’s talk about the first trick: continuing education and training.
In 2022, 11 million college students in China graduated, and more than half of the college graduates are facing the dilemma of unemployment after graduation. This situation has already appeared several years ago and will continue in the next few years.
According to the plan provided by Professor Liang University, young people who cannot find a job will continue to participate in education and training, and will continue to take exams this and that. Usually, one exam cycle is one year. That is to say, during this year, millions of young people have to continue studying and deal with different exams after leaving school. Among this exam army, there are exam companions who have settled one year ago, two years ago or even many years ago. As time goes by, fresh blood will be integrated into next year.
Not everyone can be lucky, it is a cruel reality that there are too many monks and too little porridge. Until some people couldn't stand it anymore, they withdrew from this cruel competition one after another and switched to their own way. Exit means that the youth of the past few years has been spent in vain in this unnecessary competition. Even if you pass the exam, how many of the more advanced learning in the past two or three years can be applied to your work?
Some people will say that as long as you study and further study, you will gain something. The problem is that China's learning and further study is purely a test-oriented learning and further study. From the learning methods to the learning content, it is all about how to pass the exam, not for application to practice. In addition, these young people taking the exam are originally college graduates. Repeated learning and repeated education have wasted huge social resources?
So, Professor Liang’s first move is a wrong move, even more a foolish move. The essence is to consume parents' graduation savings and encourage young people to lie down peacefully.
Let’s talk about the second trick, get married and have children.
9 years of compulsory education, three years of high school education, four years of university education, and some have also gone through two or three years of postgraduate education experience. After so many years of study, they have spent countless money on parents. The final result is that they get married and have children in their life stages where intelligence, physical strength, energy and ability are all in the best state. People can't help but ask: How can these millions of young people who have no jobs and no income rely on to buy a house? How to get married? How to give birth to a child?
Professor Liang Da, you are openly encouraging young people to rely on their parents!
Go further and further in-depth questioning. If a person is in the best state in all aspects of his life, will he still have the opportunity to devote himself to new learning and adapt to new work in the future?
Let’s assume that there was a young man who followed Professor Liang’s fallacies and gave birth to children without finding a job. Later, one of the young couples got into the system, and the other failed (in the case of too many monks and too little porridge, the probability of both of them getting into the exam is very small). The state of this family becomes that one person works and supports the whole family (not to mention how tired it is). The person who works will face more and more social interactions every day, and the social interaction will continue to expand. Another person takes care of his family full-time, and he has to face daily life. He thinks about revolving around his children every day. His social situation is shrinking. In the long run, the gap between the two people will definitely grow bigger and bigger, and the common language will definitely decrease and the family will sooner or later disintegrate.
I have to say, Professor Liang, you are really good or bad.
