With the rapid advancement of Internet technology, the rapid development of e-commerce and the popularization of takeaway, a large number of young people, even some middle-aged and elderly people, are willing to enjoy the convenience of life brought by sliding their fingertips, and the number of people going out to consume has decreased significantly. has led to the current real economy and related industries being miserable, and many street-side shops in many cities have gone bankrupt and closed.
Against this background, many people called for and to suggest "cancel takeout and close e-commerce" to restore the real economy and recover market vitality, and has thus aroused heated discussion among the masses.
Opponents: Disagree, The biggest killer of the real economy is the high rent.
Supporters: is not cancelled, but cannot over-inflate the Internet economy. Social development requires a process. The industries of online shopping, live streaming and takeaway are developing too fast, and the foundation of these industries is difficult to withstand such rapid development and have low risk resistance. Once the bubble bursts, systemic risks will occur, which will lead to a large-scale decline in my country's economy. is something that everyone does not expect to see.
Opponents: The real economy is essentially caused by the normal normal of high-intensity overtime work such as 996 and 007. Young people are tired of work and have no thoughts on getting married and having children. , these behaviors of going out shopping and consumption will consume a lot of insufficient rest time, and it is recommended to get off work at 6 o'clock, which will free the consumption power that can support the development of the real economy from work.
Supporter: physical store operations are indeed "dismal". The surface reason is the lack of traffic, the fundamental reason is "insufficient competitiveness", and this lack of competitiveness is historical reasons. Whether to moderately raise the threshold for tightening e-commerce and takeaways and leave more living space for physical stores needs to be based on the overall coordination of the whole society and the comparison between the two evils. If necessary, it can be moderately increased to e-commerce companies in terms of "taxation".
Opponents: I can buy clothes from all over the country on e-commerce platforms, without any effort, return items, pick up items at home, and freight insurance, and there is no need to look at the face of the clerk. The clerks in the physical store in have been watching people serve food in the past few decades, and have no sense of service at all.
Supporter: The real problem, I think it should be stipulated from the legal perspective that the "delivery fee" of all e-commerce platforms must be borne by users. If the delivery fee is borne by customers completely, it will be measured to be purchased in a physical store? Or buy it online? If you have the ability, you can buy it online. If you don’t have the ability to consume, you will go to the physical store. This can promote the development of physical stores, and merchants can also produce higher quality products because of profit.
Some people think that those who do e-commerce now may not have no online stores. If the physical store owners get rich, online stores can also make money; they also keep express logistics packaging, etc. In the past, physical stores were too profitable. Nowadays, physical stores are both online and offline, and the cancellation of e-commerce will only increase the difficulty of physical stores operating.
Some people also pointed out that canceling takeout and closing e-commerce will not only not restore the real economy, but will only make the only urban vitality worse. closed the flow of people and logistics in the southeast, southwest and northwest, which was equivalent to a stagnant jar. Crossing large, medium and small factories and enterprises is no different from walking backwards. Streets that don’t have to prosper in store rent, but also make money for people who struggle to make a living.
The author believes that emerging Internet industries such as e-commerce and takeaway have not only changed people's inherent way of living and consumption, but also significantly improved people's living convenience. Of course, we cannot ignore the many problems brought by the new Internet industry, such as: big data killing old , vicious competition in using subsidies, industry monopoly, etc.
At the same time, as a new economic form, the above-mentioned industries have formed a huge economic scale, solving a large number of social employment, and is a job for ordinary workers. Once the industry is hit by a huge impact, the relevant real economy will inevitably affect the fish, and will not be able to survive alone. Where should those workers at the bottom go?
