On June 28, 2022, Thomson Reuters statistics released the impact factor of the SCI journal in the previous year (2021-2022).
SCI magazine - CA, after soaring by more than 290 points last year, has experienced ups and downs this year, falling by more than 220 points this year. However, the top journal is the top journal. After such ups and downs, CA will still dominate SCI with a score of nearly 290.
At the same time, the four top journals in the medical field New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, BMJ-British Medical Journal have all increased by at least more than 50 points due to the dividends of the epidemic. Among them, Lancet still has the best growth, with an increase of 123.4 points (up 18 points last year), ranking first among the four journals with 02.731 points; JAMA also surged by 101 points, ranking third with
57.335 points, and New England Medicine The report nearly doubled, ranking second with
76.079 points. .
And the three traditional comprehensive journals: Nature, Science, and Cell have all increased significantly. Cell overtook the other two journals by 25+ points, directly breaking 60, and surpassed the second-ranked Science with 6.85 points. Nature and Science rose steadily by 15+, with Nature (9.504 points) stably breaking through 60 and breaking 70 in sight; Science also broke through 60 smoothly, reaching 3.714 points.
Looking at and , a comprehensive journal that is often involved in plant sciences, most foreign journals have basically stabilized at last year’s impact factor, while NCB and PNAS also experienced slight declines.
On the other hand, the growth of domestic journals is gratifying. Cell Research, the top domestic journal, soared by 20+ points, breaking through the 40 mark; its sister journal Cell Discovery , after rising by 4 points and breaking 10 last year, has soared by 27+ points this year. Break 30 directly. (this is the No. 1 score increase among domestic journals this year).
and Chinese Academy of Sciences 's Science Bulletin, increased by 8+ points, directly breaking 20 points. Life-Science, a subsidiary of China Sci edited by Academician Li Jiayang, broke 10 for the first time after rising 4 points.
It is worth mentioning that the former, as the "China PNAS", far surpasses the original owner.
Among botanical journals, the two review journals with the highest impact factors are still the two: Annual Review of Plant Biology increased slightly; TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE also exceeded 20 after a slight increase in points.
What must be emphasized is that the domestic journal Molecular Plant became the first botanical research journal to break the 20 mark (it was originally thought that NP would be the first to achieve this feat).
For other journals, NP increased slightly by 1+ points, while Plant Cell and New Phyto remained basically unchanged; PBJ, a British journal supported by the Chinese editor-in-chief, increased by 3.46 points, not only breaking 10 for the first time, but also surpassing the old magazine PC.
Domestic journals JIPB increased slightly by 2 points to break 9; the first impact factor of MP sister journal Plant Com was officially released, ranking among the top 10 botanical journals with .625 points.
and PP, which broke 8 points last year, fell slightly and were still at 8 points. The weak growth of PCE and JXB remained basically unchanged.
Hort Res and Plant J increased by half a point, both breaking 7.
-7 points of the magazines, most of them have good growth, and have basically increased by one segment compared to last year. Frontiers in Plant Science came to .6 points, and the whitewash was successful.
Plant Methods, JGG, Rice, PPB, Plant Sci, BMC Plant, etc., which have been below 5 points for a long time, have all successfully exceeded 5 points.
html Among the magazines with 13-5 points, Plant and Soil, PCR and PCP all unfortunately failed to break 5. Rice Science increased by 1+ points, the highest increase in this segment.
