There is nothing wrong with pursuing "fairness and justice", but achieving "fairness and justice" requires conditions. If the conditions are not met, it is difficult to achieve no matter how much you appeal, work hard, or be impatient, or exaggerate it.

https://www. ml13

Fairness is at least not the ultimate antidote

It is understandable to pursue "fairness and justice", but achieving "fairness and justice" is a condition that requires

. The conditions are not met. No matter how you call, how you work hard, how you are anxious, or how you put it online, it is difficult to achieve

even if you use responsibility to force it, what you can only be in disguise ruling

even if you take the blame The only thing that can be exchanged is to blame

forcibly achieve local goals, which will only lead to overall regression. The formation of real problems is often a complex process of long-term evolution

In this process, the problem will inevitably correlate and affect multiple elements.

The problem itself is a "relational combination", rather than an independent object

cannot just extract the problem itself, and keep other elements in the environment unchanged html l2

. Once other elements change, it is not sure that it is another "new problem".

seems to have solved the problem, but in fact the problem is just a change. Sometimes, "acceptance" and "reconciliation" are often more valuable than "interference".

is in the so-called "unreasonable" environment. Pursuing rationality is of course a long-term goal. But for individuals, "Eight Immortals cross the sea and show their magical powers" is the most realistic approach.

. The so-called "definition of the law" is the most realistic approach. Help the world, be poor, be alone

must force the environment to make changes, not to mention that the environment is not birds, even if it changes, it will inevitably become what you want