"They are not from the literary and art world, they are from the traffic world, they are plastic actors speculated by packaging." Recently, Chinese Filmmakers Association chairman Chen Daoming gave a sharp speech at a symposium. Provoked widespread comment.
What is a "plastic actor"? People may have different definitions, but nothing more than flashy, lack of quality, and lack of soul and vitality. Compared with real actors, "plastic actors" have obvious disadvantages, but the paradox is that some "plastic actors" have high popularity, high appearance rate and high income.
Why do some "plastic actors" become "popular fried chicken"? As Chen Daoming said, "plastic actors" are made by packaging and speculation. The promotion and packaging of entertainers is normal, but it completely disregards the actor's duty and deviates from the norms of the performing arts business. Excessive packaging is really inappropriate; the flow is not original sin, and the supremacy of flow is not desirable. Some "plastic actors" lack basic acting skills, nor are they focused on improving acting skills at all. In capital marketing, the deformed "rice circle culture" has become the top performer, and then swaggers through the market. Is this normal?
What is even more incredible is that some "plastic actors" "rely on cutouts in filming and recite numbers in dialogue", and their acting skills are so low that they break the bottom line. According to reports, the actor Wang Jinsong once talked about a young artist asking him: Did you memorize the lines for the show? Wang Jinsong was very angry: "Recitation is the gun that the actor used on the battlefield. Can you tell me, did you not take the gun in the trenches? How shameless you are?" Recitation is the basic skill of actors, but some "plastic actors" It happens that even the most basic things are unwilling or impossible to do. Isn't it weird that such an actor can become a "top class".
It is thought-provoking that even if "plastic actors" have poor acting skills, they can still rely on capital and "rice circle" to compete in the entertainment industry and make money every day. With such "bad money driving out good money", is there room for real actors? Individual so-called celebrities who started with excessive packaging and no bottom-line hype not only lack acting skills, but also lack artistic ethics and involve various bad deeds. Let such people become "top-class". What kind of value orientation will this bring? For some "plastic actors" who have no acting skills and no artistic ethics,Rang Rang must be waiting for them.
Currently, regulatory agencies and industry associations are stepping up efforts to control chaos in the performing arts industry, which is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. For example, they oppose malformed aesthetics, oppose "only flow first", and say no to star-priced movie pay, "yin and yang contracts", and vulgar hype. Some industry associations have proposed that they pay attention to the quality of literary works, do not use data and traffic as the main evaluation criteria, and refuse to make false hype by repeating the amount of money, brushing orders, and so on. These practices convey a clear signal that "plastic actors" made by capital are not far away, and without artistic virtue and acting skills, there is no foundation for safety.
What is a good actor, first of all, we must have a good character, stay away from impetuousness, work hard to cultivate artistic ethics, concentrate on research, work hard to temper acting skills, really come up with good works, and let the work live in the hearts of the audience. Actors concentrate on shaping roles, rather than indulging in fabricating traffic, so that the road to acting can become wider and wider.
text/Qinchuan
edit/Gong Lifang
.
