#Toutiao Creation Challenge# #No. 1 Weekly# Note: This article is the second article in a series of papers centered on "Following things as the main point". The purpose is to put forward three key points to help all friends reasonably discover the key (main theme) of the problem

Whether you have realized it at the level of subjective consciousness or not, "profit pursuit" as an innate nature always affects us unknowingly. When most people encounter problems, the first thing they think of is how to solve the problem? Therefore, most people value the solution to the problem more.

However, if we give up our urgency to succeed and pursue profits a little, we all know that without the analysis process of the problem, even if we already have solutions that we think are reasonable, can we ensure whether the existing methods are applicable? It is difficult to get results without the analysis process of using wisdom.

is more blunt. If you don’t want to think about the problem itself with your brain, you just want to solve the problem directly. The result is often the opposite direction and things are contrary to your wishes.

Therefore, if wants to effectively "grasp the main point", it must "analyze the problem first"!

Many friends will say, who said I have not analyzed the problem, I have thought about it.

: Is the so-called "thinking" a comprehensive analysis of problems using systematic methods or a quick decision after instantaneous thinking?

I have an example here. Let’s analyze

A student of mine asked me a question: Teacher, if you find a solution to the problem, but it’s too late, what should we do? Another question that values ​​solutions. Since, we should analyze the problem first. Of course, Xiaoyao will not directly answer the question of how to do it.

Xiaoyao believes that no problem will arise out of thin air. It must be reflected in specific "things". Therefore, I ask back: What is the "thing" that caused you to raise this question?

It turns out that there is a specific thing.

The student told me that the leader asked him to submit a report. When it was time to submit the report, there was a problem with his USB drive and he could not submit it on on time .

I asked him: Then how did you do it? He said: My leader and I explained the situation, went home to get the backup USB drive, and after printing it out, I handed it over to the leader. "What did the leader say?" I continued to ask. "I put forward some improvement suggestions and let me go back and change them." The student replied.

"Wasn't that problem solved? Why do you still ask me this question?" I asked. The students themselves can't explain why.

Let Xiaoyao talk about his own opinions.

is analyzed by students' questions and the confusion after communicating with me. Students should care a lot about "punctuality". Therefore, when a situation occurs where a report may not be submitted on time, the profit-seeking nature jumps out and makes quick decisions, regarding the "cannot submit a report on time on " as a "harmful situation", and then it is regarded as a need to be solved The key to the problem (the manifestation of avoiding harm). Even if the problem has been solved, I still struggle with the problem of "punctuality".

However, this "single-time decision" that "mainly me" makes it ignore the other party involved in the matter - the leader, and then ignore the key to the requirements for the leader. What the leader wants is a report that satisfies him. This is the key to the problem! Instead of submitting reports on time.

Friends, don’t think that the above situation is just an isolated case! In reality, too many answers, too many questions, too much embarrassment, contradictions and even regrets caused by overconfidence. In essence, it is often the "second decision" that "mainly me" leads to ignoring "the matter where the problem is" , ignore the "other parties involved in the matter" (referred to as "non-me") and then misjudgment the result of "the key to the problem".

So, can only "grasp the main theme"!

So, can only "grasp the main point" when puts "me and non-me" together to analyze it!

In short, when we "analyze the problem first" - "analyze the problem based on things" - "fully consider me and non-me, analyze the problem based on things", the key to the problem is often lies We burst out in our minds, and the key to bursts can often achieve the benefits of "me and non-me".

Focus on things - grasp the main idea - burst out wisdom - make multiple profits